SMALL - espritmodel.com SMALL - Telemetry SMALL - Radio
Reply
Thread Tools
Old Nov 23, 2012, 02:04 PM
Registered User
Joined Nov 2007
1,776 Posts
Nick, I appreciate your turning me onto this thread a few weeks ago. I've been looking at the "plane" you have in post 6449. Does it really fly -- or only in ground effect?

I appologize for having not read all 400+ pages of the thread yet, but was wondering if you have more info on this one?

Also planning on a build of your short EZ. This looks like fun!

PS: How do you get more than 1 prop onto a spinner? Do they make ones with "extra long" shafts so that 2 hubs can fit on?
Flyboy Steve is offline Find More Posts by Flyboy Steve
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Nov 23, 2012, 05:12 PM
What could possibly go wrong?
nickchud's Avatar
Market Harborough
Joined Apr 2006
3,773 Posts
Hello Steve

It's a great thread isn't it? Is this the plane you mean? not a canard, it was made by taking a mini Polaris and building it with 2 hulls and a space in between.. I was going to try and add a canard to try and manage it in GE, but I have given up on that idea.
WBT Flying (5 min 41 sec)


I'll look up by ShortEZ build photos and plans tomorrow.


Nick
nickchud is offline Find More Posts by nickchud
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2012, 09:12 PM
Visitor from Reality
United States, VA, Arlington
Joined Dec 1996
12,788 Posts
Nick
That is one WOW (Weird, Oddball, Wondrous) flying device.

Is it a tri-surface layout, a canard with a T tail (of some mind-boggling sort) or a T Tail'er with almost a canard surface at the front?

Whatever, the take off was neat and it sure flies good. Thank you for the video

Dereck
Dereck is offline Find More Posts by Dereck
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 02:20 AM
What could possibly go wrong?
nickchud's Avatar
Market Harborough
Joined Apr 2006
3,773 Posts
Thanks Dereck - praise indeed.

Steve:
Quote:
How do you get more than 1 prop onto a spinner?
They're ordinary spinners, I can't remember where I got them from. The props are APC, with a little of the thickness shaved off the hub.

Nick
nickchud is offline Find More Posts by nickchud
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 02:29 AM
What could possibly go wrong?
nickchud's Avatar
Market Harborough
Joined Apr 2006
3,773 Posts
Short EZ

It's a Long EZ wing plan, with a bit removed from the tips. My first attempt had the fins too small and too much side area of the fuze at the front. Amendments were then suggested by Don Stackhouse.

A very successful KFm2 experiment. Still a favorite for slow flying in rough fields with the dog.

Nick
nickchud is offline Find More Posts by nickchud
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 10:17 AM
Dude, get me some ice cream!
Felt_ripper 23's Avatar
United States, MA, Amherst
Joined Apr 2012
797 Posts
mods didnt like my rap
Felt_ripper 23 is offline Find More Posts by Felt_ripper 23
Last edited by Felt_ripper 23; Nov 25, 2012 at 02:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 10:18 AM
Dude, get me some ice cream!
Felt_ripper 23's Avatar
United States, MA, Amherst
Joined Apr 2012
797 Posts
Whoooooo yea
Felt_ripper 23 is offline Find More Posts by Felt_ripper 23
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2012, 11:30 AM
Visitor from Reality
United States, VA, Arlington
Joined Dec 1996
12,788 Posts
I think I'll duck out from under that song.

D
Dereck is offline Find More Posts by Dereck
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2012, 10:06 AM
What could possibly go wrong?
nickchud's Avatar
Market Harborough
Joined Apr 2006
3,773 Posts
JAS 39 Gripen

Here's a very good canard project:

by Steve Shumate (Jetset 44)

Have a look at the build thread by Wobish, starting here. (half way down the page)

Nick
nickchud is offline Find More Posts by nickchud
Last edited by nickchud; Nov 25, 2012 at 10:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2012, 02:11 PM
Dude, get me some ice cream!
Felt_ripper 23's Avatar
United States, MA, Amherst
Joined Apr 2012
797 Posts
wow that is beautiful. Good job
Felt_ripper 23 is offline Find More Posts by Felt_ripper 23
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2012, 02:11 PM
Dude, get me some ice cream!
Felt_ripper 23's Avatar
United States, MA, Amherst
Joined Apr 2012
797 Posts
Awwww they deleted my rap...
Felt_ripper 23 is offline Find More Posts by Felt_ripper 23
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2012, 08:12 PM
Registered User
Tick Point's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
531 Posts
Shinden as sloper

I'm considering scratch building a Shinden for PSS. I'm wondering if the large side area will foul-up its' performance on the slope. I flew an Astro blaster on the slope and it was ok but it was about a third as tall in the fuse.

Will enlarging the Vert stabs and increasing the sweep help?

Is there a post about a Shinden sloping?
Tick Point is offline Find More Posts by Tick Point
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2012, 08:54 PM
Registered User
Tick Point's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
531 Posts
Will the Shinden handle the cross winds? I bet it blows back at the top of a half-pipe.
I'll inquire in the slope forum, too.

Maybe you canardist's have some experience?

Dave
Tick Point is offline Find More Posts by Tick Point
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2012, 09:18 PM
Registered User
Don Stackhouse's Avatar
United States, OH, Bradford
Joined Jun 2005
4,121 Posts
An airplane does not feel cross winds in flight as long as they are steady (gusts or strong wind shears are another matter) The only way a plane "knows" about steady winds at all is if it's connected to the ground (which can unfortunately include being connected through a ground-based pilot, who does not understand the difference between groundspeed and airspeed). Same reason why downwind turns are not the problem, it's the pilots who don't understand the optical illusions behind the myth.

Regarding the Shinden, our experience with it (we had a Roadkill Series kit of it under development) indicated that even with an enlarged canard and hugely enlarged fins, it had problems with both pitch and yaw stability. In particular, we found that the chord of even an enlarged canard had Reynolds numbers so much less than the wing that even tiny differences in construction resulted in large differences in stability and handling from one prototype to the next. Some of them flew great, others were nearly unflyable. If you can't get consistent results, the kit cannot go into production!

With the higher Reynolds numbers of a larger model, this might be less of a problem. Also, a round fuselage will do better in yaw than a profile one on a plane like this. Lots of profile fuselage side area in front of the C/G can be very destabilizing in yaw.
Don Stackhouse is offline Find More Posts by Don Stackhouse
Last edited by Don Stackhouse; Nov 26, 2012 at 09:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 26, 2012, 11:12 PM
Flutter-Bys are fun
Conehead's Avatar
United States, MI, Honor
Joined Dec 2005
5,111 Posts
Am I a big dummy. For some strange reason I didn't check on this thread for a while. I now have 100 + pages to read. This won't happen again, that is for sure.

Not sure I can wrap my head around all that Don Stackhouse posts, I sort of understand some of what he says, other parts are way over my head and math is not my strong suit. Never understood it, sometimes I still don't.

Oh well, back to reading and I hope be caught up by the end of the month.
Conehead
Orrin Eldred
Conehead is offline Find More Posts by Conehead
RCG Plus Member
Latest blog entry: TRAMPS Air Show, 28-June 2014
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools