| RCCars | Crack Roll | Flying Giants | RC Power | The E Zone | Lift Zone | Our Sponsors | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
#31 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ajax, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,645
|
'Smoothie' is indeed a lovely airplane. I have the O'Reilly drawing in the files - very impressive model.
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gold Coast Australia.
Posts: 1,481
|
Ladybirds.
Here are 2 Ladybirds, rubber one was mentioned by Joshua and flys well on 30g rubber as used in Senators---about 1/2 the rubber as per the plan.
Ladybird Special Mills 1.3 power, and as well as a good looking old model a very good and stable flyer----both free flight. |
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Keremeos, BC Canada
Posts: 2,076
|
Ain't they beeyoootiful? I spent a lot of time looking for an OT design that I really liked, found plans for and built a Long Cabin, flew it to death on a Frog 3.5 diesel. Had to get rid of it during a "downsizing", broke my heart. Also built a High Climber, had to dump it at the same time, but a recent pic showed me that it is still flying 25+ years later.
My only (current) OT is a Canadian " Junior Commercial", a model that the RCAF used as a "beginner's model (!!!)" ~WW11... Yet to be flown. |
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Free Flight rubber flyer
|
Gossie, I was actually refering to the power version on the Ladybird. Much prettier, IMO, than the rubber version, which is a bit boxy to me.
Bmatthews, I'm gonna have to take you up on those plans. That's a great offer. Not right now though...this poor college student is a bit low on funds and waiting for summer so I can replenish them. I totally agree about the Smoothie vs the Copland, simply on the fact that the Copland has fixed gear and prop. It also lacks the character of the Smoothie what with the cabin and all. Harder to build, too, with those funny wing mounts. |
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
B for Bruce
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 4,683
|
Gossie, those are SOOOO pretty! The gassie is definetly the nicer of the two but the rubber model is still great. It's got that "toy airplane" look in a simpler and equally elegant manner about it. For myself I find that simplicity, well executed with balanced proportions, has it's own beauty and the rubber Ladybird definetly has that. And lets not forget that the gas version has all that extra power to haul around the extra "stuff"...
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Balsa Flies Better!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 5,541
|
I always thought the Stardust Special was quite pretty, but I agree that it's hard to argue with Bill Dean's Southerner. Or do you really want to argue with a Goldberg Sailplane or a Valkyrie?
Sam |
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gold Coast Australia.
Posts: 1,481
|
Don't 'argue with any of them---they are all sensational, and fly well for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ajax, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,645
|
Talk of the 'Ladybird' reminded me that I built a scaled 22" version for a specific sport biplane event some 16/17 years ago. I called it "Ladybug", only later finding that was a popular term for the insect in North America. It was a pleasant little model, good for 60-65 seconds'; I could probably do it better now ...
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
B for Bruce
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Posts: 4,683
|
Apple, a 30 inch version of that would be fun for the P30 event. We take all this contest stuff too seriously these days and this would be an ideal bit of whimsy...
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
H.E.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 31
|
some Old Timers
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Powell, OH, USA
Posts: 159
|
Paul Plecan SIMPLEX from around 1940. Built from Model Builder Magazine plans. This photo shows a K&B .28 engine, but that has since been replaced with a geared electric.
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Selma, CA, USA
Posts: 287
|
1936 French Winner. Very aerodynamic for an SAM antique, functional beauty, great flyer.
The model pictured was my SAM Electric Texaco model for the old rules, unfortunately it flew too well and I no longer have it. I'm currently building another 1005 sq.in. version for the new SAM Electric Texaco rules(the one in the picture was about 320sq.in., 17 3/4oz, 6 1700AUL batteries). The new one will have 12 1700AUL batteries in two six cell packs wired in parallel. The wing structure is way ahead of it's time, Nice airfoil and full webbed "D" box shown on the plan! |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gold Coast Australia.
Posts: 1,481
|
That's an interesting looking model.
What size was the origonal, and do you know the capacity of the engine in it please? |
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
H.E.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 31
|
some of mine Old timers
some of mine Old timers
thanks Cebola for the B.D plans!!!!!! Last edited by drumy; Apr 05, 2006 at 07:48 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Free Flight rubber flyer
|
Oian, where do you get plans for that critter? I've never built a gassie (just rubber for me), but if I ever do, that ranks high on the list.
|
|
|