|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To add.
It really helps if the first coat or two is thinned to the point that it's about as thick as homogenized milk or even a bit thinner than that. This will let it soak into the grain more and get a firmer grip on the wood. It'll also make the grain fuzz stand up more so you can sand it off lightly with fine paper. You'll need to do that for the first couple of coats. After that you can use thicker dope for a faster buildup. It'll grab the thin stuff easier. By the third or fourth coat you should be seeing some nice shine coming up. The grain will still show unless you use some for of filler beforehand. Classically talcum powder and dope is standard. Apply the thin coats and then the filler and then clear top coats. If you use thick stuff right off the bat it won't grab the wood well and under the right conditions it can peel off like a snake shedding it's skin. Steve, perhaps that was your problem? |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Western KY
Joined Sep 2003
1,489 Posts
|
Quote:
Steve, if your dope was high shrink and applied over a very stiff surface, it may have been possible for it to literally pull a crack into the coating. High shrink dope is also really bad about pulling away from 90 degree corners (rudder to fuselage joint) and producing a bridge that can be easily cracked with a finger or other object. Lastly, if you get a pinhole or have an area that is not completely sealed, oil can migrate along the underlying wood grain and cause the dope to lift. andrew |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
I have always used tissue with dope for covering sheet balsa. The additional cross fibres of the tissue add a lot of strength. This also allows use of a lighter grade of balsa, so there is little or no weight penalty. Doping (or more recently, the use of Krylon clear spray) works, but over time the balsa will split along the grain.
John O'Sullivan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Sep 2005
117 Posts
|
Thanks. Guess I'll have to give the dope only coating a little more thought.
Then again, I live in Singapore - temperature and humidity here is relatively constant year round. Will probably just try it on a piece and stress that for a while to see what happens. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As already said, dope only is not so good.
But one or 2 coats of dope, and a coat of Polyurethane on top works well, and results in a nice finish. I did this on my Grunau Baby scale sailplane : 2 coats of dope, with woodstain mixed in, and one coat of waterbased polyurethane. Once the polyurethane had cured, I "sanded" it with steel wool, to smoothen the surface: However, I don't know if this is fuelproof. Obviously, that's not an issue for me....
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion fiberglass vs. iron on covering | dmiller746 | The Builders Workshop | 6 | Dec 31, 2006 07:44 PM |
| Discussion Iron on covering vs. fiberglass | dmiller746 | Electric Plane Talk | 0 | Dec 26, 2006 02:50 PM |
| GOT a Wedgie now whats THE BEST & lightest iron on covering for EPS FOAM | rcracerx | Foamies (Kits) | 5 | Feb 10, 2002 10:07 PM |
| Light Iron-on Covering | pgleesonuk | Sport Planes | 19 | Dec 24, 2001 04:40 AM |
| Iron on covering for slow flight | RCFlybry | Parkflyers | 3 | Dec 07, 2001 01:25 PM |