| RCCars | Crack Roll | Flying Giants | RC Power | The E Zone | Lift Zone | Our Sponsors | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
#16 |
|
Hobby Hopper
|
CM & FMS
Any suggestions as to which plane to use with FMS before I fly the CM.
John |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
Posts: 2,748
|
the CM is not too hard to fly, but it might be a bit much for a first aileron plane. you don't HAVE to use the rudder to fly it properly, so don't let the full house setup scare you.
my CM flies well on the stock powertrain, but i just ordered a GWS 300C DS system to try out. it's geared 6.6:1 and will spin a 12x6 prop on 8 x 720 NiMHs. i should get about 15 oz of thrust on a 14oz AUW. i'm only using one aileron servo to save weight. i'll let you know how it goes. |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
an earth bound misfit, I
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,410
|
FMS planes
Hi John, sorry for not replying sooner. IMHO the closest flying, if not looking, models are the GP series by Shinichiro. I use the SW-Sports as a CrazyMax substitute and the GPSP as a Switchback sub.
Both have more power than the real thing but can be turned down in the .par file or just throttled back. Makes me wish I had that much (slimer) power available. ![]() There are also some Acro planes, the Edge 540 and Giles probably fly better than the CM. You can find them in Hanger 3 on Shinichiro's site: http://www.hoops.ne.jp/%7Ekimagure-h...ger_index.html BC |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Addicted to Feigao...
|
I had just measured the thrust that my 370 w/ 3.76-1 ratio setup using the stock 7.5*5 prop gives me on my f-22 raptor (It's the same exact motor used, except reversed). With an 8-cell 600mah Nicad pack I was reading 15.3 oz. of thrust static. Calculating it out, I was pulling ~7 amps at half throttle(5min. run time).
So, my question being, what's the problem? You should have a fairly good vertical, with adequate run time. To back this statement up, a local CM at my field can vertical straight up for 50-60 feet at the end of the life of the pack. ![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Registered User
|
The geared 370 is a real gem of a setup. It is simply good cheap power with less weight than a speed 400 system! The Wattage version bolts onto a firewall and the GWS version mounts on a post like the DX (IPS) series.
In this case, to gain enough additional power while maintaining a similar current draw, you will likely need a geared brushless solution. The stock 800mAh cells for the CM may handle a 10amp discharge rate for short periods. If not, you would need to jump up into a heavier cell...and the design issue cycles over again. ![]() One advantage of the brushless motor is that you can simply add a cell (or two) extra to obtain a good power increase without hurting the motor. Another option is to try a higher ratio GWS EPS (geared 370) setup. The Wattage version is a 3.75:1 ratio spinning a 7.5x5 prop. You could try a GWS version all the way up to a 6.60:1 ratio and spin an 11" or 12" prop. Essentially, you're trading top end speed for power. In any case, the CM is a fun plane to bash because it is a great flyer and it already started out life ugly. ![]() Regards. Last edited by Greg Covey; May 02, 2002 at 05:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
Posts: 2,748
|
kidknight, how did you measure your thrust? 15oz from such a little prop seems unrealistic to me. i could be wrong of course. i certainly don't get that much thrust from mine though. running 8 NiCds would probably account for some increase over the 8 x 700 NiMHs i'm using. maybe i should try running some 500ARs. i wonder if this motor can last a reasonable number of flights at that kind of power. perhaps i will find out
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Addicted to Feigao...
|
Since I have the wattage 370 motor in the f22 (pusher plane), you can easily measure thrust by holding the plane with your hands ( just enough to balance), balancing the nose on a digital scale, and by using the tare (zero) option on the scale, you can get a rough estimate of the thrust. It will fluctuate a little from holding it, but once you get it under control it'll stay within about .4 oz of the real amount of thrust.
Just so you feel that I'm not making this up, w/ a 6 cell nicad pack: quarter throttle - 2.4 oz half throttle - 7 oz straight (no fluctuation) full - 12 oz 8 cell nicad 600 pack (btw, this pack came from nesail with the intention of being used with a 14t Speed 400 colbalt motor, so it might be an "AR" pack )half throttle - 10 oz full "punch" - 15 and some change after running the 6 cell pack for full duration at half power, it was fairly hot, but the motor was scortching hot! Never Again!
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 993
|
So KidNight, are you saying you can hover with the Crazy Max?
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Addicted to Feigao...
|
wait a minute...
I don't have the crazy max, just the same motor that comes with the crazy max. I have the wattage f22, which happens to weigh in at 20 ounces (can't hover). I just flew the f22 today, and I was able to pull straight up from level flight for about 40-50 feet or so before stalling (this was with the 8cell pack)...
So, with this same motor in the crazy max, I'd suppose that you might have a fairly good vertical. BTW, If I really was into hovering, I would definitly want around 18 or 20 oz of thrust, not just enough to barely keep afloat... |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Addicted to Feigao...
|
by the way, I live at 30 feet above sea level, so that might give me little bit of an advantage using the stock setup....
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question Who flies the Crazy Max 3D? | witstick | Parkflyers | 3 | Feb 07, 2002 05:03 PM |
| Wattage Crazy Max 3D | PunkerTFC | Electric Plane Talk | 20 | Jan 29, 2002 06:44 PM |
| Crazy Max 3D is a winner! | Andreas | Parkflyers | 9 | Jan 02, 2002 09:55 PM |
| WattAge Crazy Max 3D | Gene Bond | Parkflyers | 31 | Dec 18, 2001 12:57 PM |
| Crazy Max 3D ROCKS!!! | ls77 | Parkflyers | 4 | Dec 13, 2001 01:27 AM |