|
|
|
|
|
Blu-51cd A/E/T Simple Fun Fighter
Here's one that's been back-burnered for a while...
30"ws 200sqin 7.3oz RTF 15t/24g GBv motor 8040HD prop 2s830 5.25oz/sqin ~100W/lb ![]() It's just a simple 3 channel A/E/T plane. The wing is flat, with a 4/40TLAR airfoil. The wing is braced with a single heavy skewer hot-glued into a slot. The H-fuse crutches are hot-glued in place. The motor is held in with 2 small skewers hot-glued to the fuse intersecting diagonal corners with some 2-sided tape wrapped around the bearing tube, and some tie-wraps holding it to the skewers. It's a fun one! Took right off from the first launch, and I had Jerbear video it during the first pack. We got a little, sorry for the light. Later I was trying to hover it, and wondering why the rudder wasn't working I went for the 4/40 underchamber to eliminate CG/pitch issues and also promote a reasonable glide. It worked! It flies fine inverted, too, as seen in the video. Roll rate is reasonable, maybe 3/sec... Loops are easy, inside or outside. Turns are not bad at all.Slap one together and have a blast! Or go racing I was going to do it up in 'Miss America' Colors, but chickened out & went military.It's built very similarly to my C-47, so no surprises. Honestly, I was hoping it'd come out about an ounce lighter, but I didn't do anything special, either. It could be built an easy ounce lighter with 3mm Depron, but the wing would need reinforcement. Maybe a hybrid??? One note: I had to use a 90° servo arm instead of 180°, so the ailerons would work right. The angle that they are from the servo means that there would not have been adequate up travel, and excessive down. This would have given bad adverse yaw. See the pictures. I'm sure there are plenty of other power systems that'd work. They wouldn't be as powerful and light, but a couple of ounces backed by a few more watts (and some bracing) aught to be OK. Maiden Video Edit, Warning: It seems most of us are coming out tail heavy when building per the plan... This means the battery is being mounted in front of the cg in order to balance. It is a better practice to try to balance the plane without the pack, but with all the other equipment. To do this, mount the motor and use some tape to temporarily hold the servos and other equipment in place, trying to get it to balance on the cg. This way, using different weight packs will not affect the cg. GPW suggested moving the wing back 1" from the plan, This is good advice, based on the input thus far. I have not revised the plan, but you probably should consider the change in your build. Edit: New Plans uploaded 4-17-06, with the wing moved back. Just make sure the peak of the wing is about the start of the canopy. You can check the balance before cutting the wing slot by taping the components in place without the wing in place. Step-by-Step built thread: http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=577951 Added a scaled up print to 48", and added the ips size (24")... Suggest trying a KFm airfoil for better wind pennetration, bu I haven't tried.. Decrease the dihedral for a sportier flight. Decrease the wing incidence for higher speed w/o climbing. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| help with filip e t-tail | billyboy | Electric Sailplanes | 6 | Nov 12, 2001 12:37 AM |
| cambrian fun fighter spitfire conversion? | kartman24 | Sport Planes | 6 | Aug 05, 2001 12:57 AM |
| simple fun | wigdaj | High Performance | 5 | Jul 26, 2001 01:23 PM |
| Filip E T-Tail | Woody | Electric Sailplanes | 20 | Jun 30, 2001 10:17 AM |
| Flip E T-tail | sal | Electric Sailplanes | 0 | Jun 15, 2001 01:04 AM |