|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Joined Oct 2002
34,897 Posts
|
Quote:
Thanks for your comments and yes, indeed the $69.99 price all ready built, covered and ailerons, rudder, and elevator all installed and hinged for you! I have estimated that my MACH-I has a total investment of less than $250.US using the Brush motor and used Heli Brush ESC with slow start. ![]() I will keep you all posted and will post details of weight, costs, AMP/WATT draw and most important performance and flight characteristics using this Electric Motor setup! Carlos
|
|
|
|
|
|
Milwaukee Wisconsin, United States
Joined Feb 2001
4,564 Posts
|
I would expect your setup will add about another 30-32 oz or so for about 65 oz RTF.
I had inputted a higher weight for my above calculations which gave a higher 24 mph stall speed. With a 65 oz RTF weight, stall drops to 21 mph, enough lower that the 12x8 / 3.8:1 combo " might " be ok. Dean in Milwaukee |
|
|
|
|
Joined Oct 2002
34,897 Posts
|
Parts Layout!
All of the necessary and important parts layed out for quick assembly
![]() Even though the ESC came with the diodes and capcitors, I opted to use the capacitors that the Motor came with and used the diode in the TEAM ORION package since it's the same diode used in my SKY RAIDER MACH-I setup!
|
|
Last edited by guapoman2000; May 01, 2004 at 12:45 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Oct 2002
34,897 Posts
|
Silver band connector side of DIODE goes to the Positive (+) terminal of the motor. In other words, even though the Motor has a label showing (+) I connected the Silver band side to the Negative (-) terminal of the motor since the motor needs to rotate reverse for gearbox setup.
Therefore, where ever you have to have the Positive (+) of the ESC connector at the specific terminal at the motor in order for the motor to rotate for GEARBOX setup, that's where the Silver Band needs to go!
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX, USA
Joined Feb 2001
415 Posts
|
Carlos, this project is entirely your fault; I saw the Raider II in the LHS a couple of weeks ago after reading your thread on the Raider I. I could not resist it.
I first intended to get some GP3300's, but decided to try it with two of the Lipo packs I have for my smaller planes. The problem is, with this light equipment, its difficult to get the cg far enough forward. So I ended up with the Lipo's mounted to the FRONT of the firewall. The Endoplasm is as far forward as possible and the servos and Rx are ahead of the cg. It is still slightly tail heavy. It is geared 4.6:1, 10x8E prop, two 3S1P tanic 1500 packs in parallel. Pulls about 300W static. AUW is 3.75 lbs; which is more than a pound lighter than the suggested glow weight! I flew it today for the first time and was pleasantly surprised. It leaves the ground in abt 20ft and has plenty of power for simple aerobatics. I flew rather sedately with some full power, and the motor and batts were barely warm after 10 min flights. The Lipo's took about 80% to recharge. The only problem is, if I start pushing it harder, the Lipo's will probably get overworked. I need some heftier batteries. |
|
|
|
|
Joined Oct 2002
34,897 Posts
|
Wow! I am really glad your MACH-II flew well !
Yes, I am known to inspire or realy get people to hate me. Like I say when I pass by the BIG BOSS floor (The NO FLY ZONE), either you get a Pat on the back or a nose bleed Super light weight with those Li-POLYs! Yes, if you are pushing 40+ AMPS for good performance flight then, I would add another one in parallel to take the AMP load. Carlos
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Yippee! SKY RAIDER MACH-II by WORLD MODELS Part 2 | guapoman2000 | Sport Planes | 169 | Oct 03, 2008 02:29 PM |
| Discussion Sky Raider Mach II | David Hipperson | Glow to Electric Conversions | 0 | Dec 14, 2006 03:07 AM |
| Video Sky Raider Mach II retract retrofit operation | GregG | Electric Plane Talk | 2 | Feb 09, 2006 06:53 PM |
| Found WTB Sky Raider Mach II | jimmyray | Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) | 7 | Sep 13, 2005 01:05 PM |
| Sky Raider Mach II | qasim715 | Fuel Plane Talk | 29 | Dec 28, 2004 08:14 AM |