HobbyKing.com New Products Flash Sale
Reply
Thread Tools
Old Mar 14, 2013, 06:12 PM
I don't like your altitude
Stupot46's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
3,278 Posts
Good to see you're straight back on the rebuild.4min.flight next time!
Stupot46 is offline Find More Posts by Stupot46
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Mar 14, 2013, 06:14 PM
Registered User
United States, FL, North Port
Joined Mar 2004
3,208 Posts
Haha. Yep, definitely gonna keep it down to 4 mins... Until i csn get some bigger batteries
invertmast is online now Find More Posts by invertmast
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2013, 01:49 PM
Registered User
United States, FL, North Port
Joined Mar 2004
3,208 Posts
Maiden #2 completed.. successfully!

1/5.3 Horten 229 Maiden #2 (0 min 0 sec)
invertmast is online now Find More Posts by invertmast
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2013, 01:36 AM
I don't like your altitude
Stupot46's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
3,278 Posts
Congratulations guys,very impressive flying,and a nice return to terra firma.
Looking forward to your development work;hope it goes according to plan.Any thoughts on trying the vanes in the duct on one of them,it would make for an interesting trial by comparison?
Stupot46 is offline Find More Posts by Stupot46
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 19, 2013, 06:03 AM
Registered User
United States, FL, North Port
Joined Mar 2004
3,208 Posts
No plans as of yet, we are just gonna fly it for now
invertmast is online now Find More Posts by invertmast
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 23, 2013, 06:09 PM
Registered User
Canada
Joined Nov 2000
6,980 Posts
This Ain't.. Uwes' IX . Or Keith Shaws'
A build off essentially .. Bentley's 'scale' drawings as redrawn/model structure added in by Hethcoat.
Serious perf is unlikely.
Happy to be proven wrong though.
Bare is offline Find More Posts by Bare
Last edited by Bare; Apr 23, 2013 at 06:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 23, 2013, 06:49 PM
Registered User
United States, FL, North Port
Joined Mar 2004
3,208 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bare View Post
This Ain't.. Uwes' IX . Or Keith Shaws'
A build off essentially .. Bentley's 'scale' drawings as redrawn/model structure added in by Hethcoat.
Serious perf is unlikely.
Happy to be proven wrong though.
Uh. What?
invertmast is online now Find More Posts by invertmast
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 24, 2013, 12:01 AM
Registered User
slebetman's Avatar
Malaysia, Selangor, Kajang
Joined Jun 2009
1,405 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by invertmast View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear
This Ain't.. Uwes' IX . Or Keith Shaws'
A build off essentially .. Bentley's 'scale' drawings as redrawn/model structure added in by Hethcoat.
Serious perf is unlikely.
Happy to be proven wrong though.
Uh. What?
Let me see if I can translate that:

> This doesn't look like it's based on Uwes or Keith Shaws plans
> It looks like it was built based on Bently's scale drawings with some
> structure added by Hethcoat
> It's unlikely to perform well.
> Though I could be wrong.

Am I close?
slebetman is offline Find More Posts by slebetman
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 24, 2013, 01:04 AM
I don't like your altitude
Stupot46's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
3,278 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slebetman View Post
Let me see if I can translate that:

> This doesn't look like it's based on Uwes or Keith Shaws plans
> It looks like it was built based on Bently's scale drawings with some
> structure added by Hethcoat
> It's unlikely to perform well.
> Though I could be wrong.

Am I close?
I think you got the bare essentials.
Stupot46 is offline Find More Posts by Stupot46
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 24, 2013, 06:05 AM
Registered User
United States, FL, North Port
Joined Mar 2004
3,208 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slebetman View Post
Let me see if I can translate that:

> This doesn't look like it's based on Uwes or Keith Shaws plans
> It looks like it was built based on Bently's scale drawings with some
> structure added by Hethcoat
> It's unlikely to perform well.
> Though I could be wrong.

Am I close?

Now that makes sense.


Well, performance is prettt good for a 36lbairplane, considering its still early on in our flight testing.

Level flight speed at 1/2 throttle is 80-90mph, takeoffs are still long due to it being nose heavy, it rolls pretty dang good.

So im going to say he's wrong in it not performing well. I think it does exceptionally well.
invertmast is online now Find More Posts by invertmast
Last edited by invertmast; Apr 24, 2013 at 08:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 24, 2013, 07:57 AM
I don't like your altitude
Stupot46's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
3,278 Posts
So im going to say he's wrong in it not performing well. I think it does exceptionally well.[/QUOTE]

#1
Stupot46 is offline Find More Posts by Stupot46
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 24, 2013, 11:41 PM
Registered User
slebetman's Avatar
Malaysia, Selangor, Kajang
Joined Jun 2009
1,405 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by invertmast View Post
Well, performance is prettt good for a 36lbairplane, considering its still early on in our flight testing.

Level flight speed at 1/2 throttle is 80-90mph, takeoffs are still long due to it being nose heavy, it rolls pretty dang good.

So im going to say he's wrong in it not performing well. I think it does exceptionally well.
Yeah, I don't understand that bit as well since you've actually posted videos of the flights and it doesn't look to be underpowered at all. Heck, for an EDF, being able to do a rolling take off from grass is an amazing achievement regardless of airframe. Most commercial RTF or ARF EDF jets can't do that.
slebetman is offline Find More Posts by slebetman
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 25, 2013, 06:37 AM
Registered User
United States, FL, North Port
Joined Mar 2004
3,208 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slebetman View Post
Yeah, I don't understand that bit as well since you've actually posted videos of the flights and it doesn't look to be underpowered at all. Heck, for an EDF, being able to do a rolling take off from grass is an amazing achievement regardless of airframe. Most commercial RTF or ARF EDF jets can't do that.
An internet expert who didnt read the thread i giess?
invertmast is online now Find More Posts by invertmast
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2013, 03:48 PM
Registered User
United States, FL, North Port
Joined Mar 2004
3,208 Posts
Flights #4 and 5 were completed successfully today. I removed 2oz of lead for flight #4. Other than a gear door coming off in flight due to a broken hinge (still not sure why the hinge was broken, as the nose gear was fully up when the doors close... weird). Otherwise, not allot of change noticed with the nose weight removed. I did replace the steering servo/battery mount plate with a 1/4" aircraft ply plate. Ground steering is greatly improved and its issues finally (hopefully) fixed..

Flight #5 involved remove 3oz of weight from the nose. I feel this made a much better improvement in handling than previous weight removal's. It got off the ground quicker, and elevator authority felt better during the landing flare. This could be wrong, as there was a significant headwind as well.

Here's flight #4's video.. still a bit shaky, but Tom's getting better

1/5.2 Horten flight #4 (0 min 0 sec)
invertmast is online now Find More Posts by invertmast
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 27, 2013, 05:43 PM
I don't like your altitude
Stupot46's Avatar
Joined Sep 2011
3,278 Posts
That is some serious perf guys,You seem to have it well sorted.
Stupot46 is offline Find More Posts by Stupot46
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Build Log 123 1/2" ho-229 edf invertmast Nurflügel 14 Sep 15, 2012 01:51 PM
Ho 229 Build northropn9m Flying Wings 154 Oct 22, 2009 05:42 PM
Building the Luftwaffe secret weapon - Horten Ho 9/229 XPHAM Electric Ducted Fan Jet Talk 107 Dec 15, 2005 01:31 PM
Jack Cooper's ho 229 (sting wing) mothflyer Slope 4 Sep 01, 2003 11:26 AM
Building the secret Luftwaffe weapon - Horten Ho 9/229 XPHAM Scale Kit/Scratch Built 14 Apr 01, 2003 08:26 PM