Originally Posted by MtnGoat
If one was interested in making a valid case my arguments were wrong, why one would be showing actual contradictions in them instead of resorting to the method you're demonstrating here.
I notice you have few problems with the fantasies of the left, where the contradictions abound. Of course this is a given for moral systems which not only make no claim to being logical, they actively avoid self analysis or critiques which would result in one which is. After all, down that path would be the falsification of so many of the assertions the ideas rest upon.
I have made valid cases before, each time you claim I am arguing against something you are not saying.
This is a common argument from you, not just with me, but with others.
Each time we take one of your posts, brake it down and argue against it, you move the goal posts, change the idea, say we are misunderstanding your points.and the best one, when we have you cornered and shown to be in error, you abandon the thread and start one on a different subject.
I have no problems with my beliefs, I don't believe they are what you make them out to be, the left does not believe half the things you claim it does and does not do the things you say it does.
As for your stated beliefs being based on Logic and morals, what a load of