Originally Posted by DenverJayhawk

Wrong again. I corrected it seconds after it was posted.

I started the reply before you corrected your post. That is evident from the misspelling being contained in the quote of your post.

Originally Posted by madsci_guy

I started the reply before you corrected your post. That is evident from the misspelling being contained in the quote of your post.

Well than u started the reply immediatley after the first post then sat on it for some time while straining yourself for a clever reply. Because I edited it within seconds of the first post.

Originally Posted by madsci_guy

I started the reply before you corrected your post. That is evident from the misspelling being contained in the quote of your post.

Yet, of course, that does not mean that the post was not corrected before you replied. It could easily have been corrected within seconds and produce exactly the result seen.

No way to tell, since he's under the 5 minute limit. Not that I much care.

Originally Posted by madsci_guy

No way to tell, since he's under the 5 minute limit. Not that I much care.

Well, other than the man has said that he edited his post within seconds. There is no real reason to disbelieve that, is there?

Originally Posted by madsci_guy

Not that I much care.

Will be true after you stop reporting.

Originally Posted by DenverJayhawk

Will be true after you stop reporting.

Huh? What evidence is there that he has reported anything?

Originally Posted by AintQytRite

This is the first time ive ever seen you be correct in an issue. You are dead on we need to know who is doing the bogus reporting at least the reports that do not result in an infraction.

Why?

Originally Posted by wrightme

Huh? What evidence is there that he has reported anything?

Already been over this.

Originally Posted by DenverJayhawk

Already been over this.

Really? The only thing presented was your empty speculation.

You say he should stop reporting, and there is nothing to indicate that he has reported.

Originally Posted by wrightme

Really? The only thing presented was your empty speculation.

You say he should stop reporting, and there is nothing to indicate that he has reported.

really. Do try to keep up.

Originally Posted by DenverJayhawk

really. Do try to keep up.

LOL, I have.

So far, no 'proof' that those you accuse have reported anyone, except your own bare speculation.

Originally Posted by wrightme

Why?

We have already been over this but the same reason we need to know who is infracted.

Originally Posted by madsci_guy

If the Mods think that you are frivolously or maliciously reporting posts, you will be warned, and that becomes public on the "Infractions page". What more do you need to know?

Sometimes, it's a case of misunderstanding the rules. You really want to reveal an honest mistake or difference of opinion?

Yes we should know every reporter. Users should not be reporting post that they aren't sure breaks the rules. Only obvious serious examples should be reported.

Originally Posted by DenverJayhawk

Wow. I'm hurt you think I've not been correct. How's that Democrat Racism jewel of a thread that you started?

I don't think. It's obvious.