|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LA Ming,
That was a very interesting post, sir! I am sort of in the same boat as you-I just started flying CL again a few months ago, for the first time in 30 years or more. I normally fly R/C helicopters and, truthfully, found the helicopter a bit more relaxing than the U-Control. Bear in mind, I am not flying the high performance machines that you are, I was flying a Wen Mac Yellow Jacket (about the same age as I am-55) and a Cox PT-19. I flew each of them a couple of times (this time a Tubojet), and then did not touch them for a month or two. The dizziness got to me, I had trouble staring the .049's, and it seemed rather lack-luster for the amount of time and effort to get everything together to fly again. I keep restoring .049's and worked with starting them. Also added a couple of shots of automotive starting fluid to my glow fuel (Testors fuel has ether or some other igniter in it). The .049's suddenly became much easier to start and ran more reliably. I flew again a couple of times and, although the dizzyness is still there, it is much better (15 foot lines are very, very short, even with relatively slow airplanes). The 20 fool lines on the Cox models are a bit better. For some reason, I started to get the enjoyment out of U-Control flying again. It just started to come back to me and, for a few minutes, I could be about 13 years old again (ok, with gray hair, wrinkles, and a paunch, but it still felt like it, for a few minutes-about the time it took to burn through a tank of gas). I enjoy reading your posts-please continue to do so. Comparing notes after returning from so long an absence is interesting (at least it is, for me). And you are right, it is much slimier than I remember, also (although it smells great!). Excuse me, but there is a P-39 sitting on the floor behind me, that needs an engine overhaul. Keep us posted, sir! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Jul 2012
439 Posts
|
"And you are right, it is much slimier than I remember, also (although it smells great!)".
I always remember it as being oily/nasty although the smell was great (glow), the clean up wasn't. I wipe down the model/test stand after each use, and man does it take a bunch of paper towels! Electric is so much cleaner, and fun in it's own way, but the glow/diesel stuff still has it's charms even today. "For some reason, I started to get the enjoyment out of U-Control flying again. It just started to come back to me and, for a few minutes, I could be about 13 years old again (ok, with gray hair, wrinkles, and a paunch, but it still felt like it, for a few minutes-about the time it took to burn through a tank of gas)". It's called giving us a reason to be alive and be glad of that, this is one, there are others as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
JKinTX:
Well, thanks for the kind words. I guess I was disappointed in comparison to how accomplished I used to be and how terribly rusty I was today. Shucks... when I was young and fearless, I could fly 118 MPH Tyrantula's without looking at the thing! (Used to showboat and invite someone out in the circle to see what a combat plane looked like from inside the circle... then look 'im in the eye and carry on a convesation while I was chewing up the air behind me!) Alas... those were the days! However, I see what you mean. I should be thrilled I can even fly the fool things anymore. Givin' Honey Buns a kiss is a good idea... be right back... Ah Chem: Well... I was just being transparent, I reckon. I can't help but feel that control line will be a part of me in someway for the rest of my life, either in action or in attachment... but HOW I will enjoy it in action remains to be seen. That I will deduce as time goes by. Also, there is NO comparison to the feel of a plastic ready-to-fly plastic plane on short dacron lines and the flying ability of a good 35 size control line airplane on 60' steel lines. No comparison at all. IF you ever get a chance to fly one... do so... it could change your entire outlook and perception of control line. JKinTX: Yup... nasty is the word. BUT... like you say... that wonderful exhaust smell... mmmmmm... sweet to the olefactory senses! It will be interesting to me personally to see where this all leads me. OF course... there is NO LAW that says I can't enjoy any of the aspects of model aircraft I want to, is there? I don't HAVE to stick with just ONE... right? |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Joined Jul 2012
439 Posts
|
Quote:
I like R/C Scale sailplanes and R/C model boats too! I love the smell of burning nitro in the morning, it is the smell of victory! |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Joined Jul 2012
439 Posts
|
"Also, there is NO comparison to the feel of a plastic ready-to-fly plastic plane on short dacron lines and the flying ability of a good 35 size control line airplane on 60' steel lines. No comparison at all. IF you ever get a chance to fly one... do so... it could change your entire outlook and perception of control line".
Not so. Everyone has their own path, and the plastic RTF's are just another facet of the C/L world and just as valid. They aren't easy to get to fly either and are a rare and dying breed. You can always build more wood stuff, but you can't snap your fingers and get a Wen-Mac Cutlass or a K&B B-25 so easy... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Des Moines, IA
Joined Oct 2005
315 Posts
|
Andre - welcome back. It was a pleasant surprise that you started posting and chronicled your re-entrance. As to your somewhat less - than - satisfying results on day one, well not so surprising. One thing that you haven't mentioned as considering - get yourself a nice-flying electric control line setup to fly in between the Cub flights -- not something 1/2A size, but something 35-40 size. I guarantee that you will find it as much fun and relaxation - you will enjoy the physical connection to the plane but with none of the hassles and anxiety of glow powered combat planes (and none of the goo, either). It is simply a matter of rolling out the lines, flying until you have had enough and rolling up the lines again. It may re-kindle your fire for the glow stuff too. There are some interesting developments going on - the recently passed rule change making RC control of functions other than elevator (in competition and in certain events) and the development of RPM governing timers for control line being two examples. Or, you may find that it's just not your cup of tea anymore. Either way, you will learn something interesting, and either way, welcome back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In between"
You can put a 10-4 or an 11-4 on the 36X, and it cannot fly as fast. You can measure some engines at the Tulsa Collecto and find one or more from current engine designs that will drop into 36X mounts, and run on fuel with 5-6% castor plus 18% synthetic (much easier to clean up at the end of the day).
Even the Powermaster Fuels (now marketed by VP) with 50/50 lubrication were cleaner running that straight castor (11% synthetic oil, 11% castor). About a year before I first went to Tulsa, I'd been flying slower planes, nothing faster than about 65-70 mph, for several years, and I was already 60 back then. Jeff had several spare Arrowplanes, and motor mounts for Fox 35 Combat, which fit the OS Max 25s. I went with him to Amarillo to a contest there, and flew a couple of those planes then, with 10-4 props. My problem that day was the patterns on my running shoes had too good a grip, literally. The grass circles have asphalt centers, and the surface texture was rough. I kept stumbling when I wanted to side-step, and the shoes wanted me going straight ahead instead! Same as you, I kept on maneuvering on the downwind half. I don't imagine I was flying any faster than 85 mph, maybe 90, but it seemed faster. I was a happy guy that day, though. Those Arrowplanes are really special. Kiwi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JKinTX:
Points taken and now agree concerning the historic value and rarity of the vintage plastic planes, and the courage it takes to fly them without harm. There is indeed a "different" set of flying skills you need to access in order to accomplish same. My statement was intended to be more along the line of the vast differences between the flying abilities of a plastic airplane and a 35-sized sport flyer capable of the stunt pattern. I know I was thrilled at the heavy pull on the lines and solid feel of the airplanes when I went from my .049's to the bigger stuff back in the 1960's. However, one must remember that I believed what I read in the instruction sheets of my built up balsa .049's: 35' Dacron lines! Talk about "light" feeling out there on the end of the lines! FWIW: In the early 80's I begin to fly some 1/2 A combat with 35' .012 cable lines and TeeDee's. Wow... that too... was vastly different than a Golden Bee powered Combat Kitten on 35' dacron lines! I really enjoyed tinkering with 1/2A combat over the next decade or so... even hooking up with a group in OKC and flying some 1/2A combat with them a few times. Lots of fun... but you can sure tear up some airplanes! Mike: Thanks for the welcome and glad you have enjoyed my verbosity!! (I "talk" alot online, apparently.) I don't know a thing about electric C/L. Perhaps that would be a fun online study one of these winter evenings. I have yet to determine how much of my interest in control line is nostalgic motivated, or flying experience motivated. If nostalgic, then the electrics may not ring my bell and the glow engines will have to be part of the equation in some way. If the flying experience itself is the big kahuna... then it won't be as important as to what is powering the airplane. All this to be determined in good time. I must confess that it does still sound REALLY GOOD to hear a nice 36X going through its paces at the end of the lines. I so wish someone around here flew these old vintage combat planes, too. For I just love to watch them manuerver and listen to the sounds of the engine/etc. Kiwi: Big time respect from this boy if you're still flying at 85 MPH in your 70's!!! As for the synthetics: You gotta' remember I'm (for the most part) a product of Duke's indoctrination when it comes to things glow engine. Duke was adamant about castor oil and its superior lubrication qualities. I must say, that my experience repairing customer engines really substantiated his doctrine. Soooo... I reckon', for better or worse, I'll be staying with 100% castor in my ancient and prized "babies". The clean up will just have to be better addressed. (Like wet wipes and cleaning spray and paper towels ON SITE when flying.) FWIW: After the first flight yesterday, my helper said something to the effect "No wonder your wife doesn't like to launch these things!". (He said as he held out the front of his goo covered pull-over fleece hoodie!) I laughed and made the comment that REAL MEN don't mind a bit of grease an' goo on them! (Yeah... hypocritcal... but hey... what else was I to say?) Well... did it again. Typed a novelete instead of a reply. There is no hope. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LA Ming,
"Finally, the bladdered emptied and I brought in down for a landing." I just wanted to confirm that it was the bladder on the aircraft you were referring to.. (we are both old guys : D ) Great thread, sir! JKinTX, Interesting you should mention the Wen Mac Cutlass-I have just acquired a very tired one, with the intention of getting it flyable (I have one-new in the box, which will never be flown). I have been flying a Wen Mac A-24, with plans to fly one of the Wen Mac Flying wings in the near future. Thank you for your thoughtful post, sir! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Jul 2012
439 Posts
|
"My statement was intended to be more along the line of the vast differences between the flying abilities of a plastic airplane and a 35-sized sport flyer capable of the stunt pattern".
Understood and I couldn't agree more. Two different worlds. It's like the difference between a Cushman Super Eagle and a Suzuki Hayabusa. I enjoy both! It wasn't a criticism, merely an observation. Got a Combat Kitten double kit and a Lil' Satan in the kit stash, I need to pull them out and get busy. Holland Hornets for the Kittens and a Black Widow for the LS. Baby Flite Streak with an Atwood Wasp too I need to do... Right now rebuilding engine test stand. |
|
|
|
|
Joined Jul 2012
439 Posts
|
"After the first flight yesterday, my helper said something to the effect "No wonder your wife doesn't like to launch these things!". (He said as he held out the front of his goo covered pull-over fleece hoodie!) I laughed and made the comment that REAL MEN don't mind a bit of grease an' goo on them! (Yeah... hypocritcal... but hey... what else was I to say?)
Well... did it again. Typed a novelete instead of a reply. There is no hope". Tell him to be glad you weren't flying a diesel- he ain't seen nuthin' yet! PS: Keep writing, it's most enjoyable to read!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, good for you on getting that gear in the air again! This past summer I dug out one of my 1/2A combat planes and flew it several times. I know what you mean about the adrenaline kicking in, I was behind the plane real bad on the 1st tank of fuel. It got better the more I flew it, but,like you, it confirmed my view that flying combat is a young man's thing. I also used to enjoy flying in Goodyear competition, but again, I'm at the stage in life where it's just not fun having to work at keeping up with the plane. Maybe that explains why I have a Pathfinder stunter with an OS 46LA on the building board now...Stunting is a load of fun!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah Chem:
LOL on the bladder thing!! (Why... just about pee'd my pants laughing. Darned ol' bladders.) JK: I've never been around a diesel... really messy, eh? Also... sounds like you have some EXCELLENT projects on the shelf waiting for you. Reminds me... I need to get back up to the attic and bring down my "tribute" Combat Kitten I built when I was last active and clean it up and get a pic to share. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion Can't get Apprentice back in the air after loop | williecdog | Electric Plane Talk | 32 | Sep 11, 2012 07:26 AM |