|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RysiuM -
Thanks for your advice and comments. This is uncharted territory for me. Until now, my experience with R/C motors has been limited to flying the IPS-A in various planes. Yes, it's direct drive, and yes, I know I am abusing the battery packs. And yes, I know that a 9x7 is too much prop. I'm a bad boy. However, these are the only batteries and props I have at the moment, and I wanted to see if the motor worked at all. Now that I know it works, I'll be getting some better props. I only briefly pulled more then 4.5A from the battery packs, so hopefully I have not cooked any of them. The packs never got more than mildly warm. I measured 3.5 ounces thrust with a freshly-charged 7-cell pack and the 9x7. I could not use 100% throttle because above about 80%, the voltage would instantly drop below the controller's cut-off. Basketcase is flying a similar motor in his Tiger Moth and is using a GWS 8x4.3 and 2 li-polys with good results. I think I will order a selection of props to see what works best. - Jeff |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
On a given turn number, the thicker wire is the better, thicker wire has lower resistance, lower resistance means lower copper loos, higher efficiency. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Vacaville, Calif
Joined Jul 2003
98 Posts
|
Grinding N45s?
I installed my new 5x5x1 45s in the cap, now it is a tad too big to fit over the stator.
Can I take the Dremel and reduce the bulk and/or if I do will I damage the magnets or create other problems? Got my second CDromer to fire up..no rewind.. with a CC 10. No Tach yet nor way of affixing the prop but alas.. ingenuity will soon strike (translates to a trip to the online RC shops LOL)Anway, the grinding of the magnets is the big question of the day for me.. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
My stator must be very small compared to others. Using 26G I couldn't fit more than 16T in 4 layers (5,5,4,2). When I used 2 x 30G I was able to fit 18 turns in 5 layers (4,4,4,3,3). How do you fit 26T on 26G I need another CD-ROM However without the prop on WOT my motor sounds like turbine and takes 1.5A. ![]() RysiuM |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
"The Kv value, ie the rpm/V depends on the number of turns. The more the turns, the lower the Kv.
On a given turn number, the thicker wire is the better, thicker wire has lower resistance, lower resistance means lower copper loos, higher efficiency." Thanks MMoromota: So less turns and thicker wire is best, ie more rpms per volt? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RysiuM -
Here's my stator. It is about 24mm in diameter. I wound four layers of #26 (~ 4mm) wire: 7, 7, 6, and 6 turns per layer. I used #26 magnet wire from Radio Shack. I was able to keep the windings fairly neat and parallel, although you can see a couple of loose turns in the photo. Trprhook - I have seen a number of warnings that you should NOT grind the magnets. If you have clearance problems, the knowledgeable guys recommend grinding the stator instead. The problem is heat. If the magnets get hot, they can begin to lose their magnetic properties. There are several reports of magnets drastically weakened by grinding. Question for all: When replacing the stock ring magnet with more powerful N45 magnets, what are the effects on RPM, torque, and current drain, assuming batteries and prop remain the same? - Jeff |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tokyo, Japan
Joined Nov 2002
794 Posts
|
Re: Grinding N45s?
Quote:
I use 5x5x0.9t N45. Takao |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Tiny with CD-ROM HP x 52
Today I finally got my measurments.
So on the C drive, 2 cells of 1500LiPo I got 6020 rpm, with GWS 8x4.3. giving me a little more than 7oz thrust (the plane with this battery weights 7 oz and on WOT it's going up a little). Funny thing, but this RPM on that prop gives the same result on my prop calculator. The battery gives around 8V and motor takes 3.8A. Now the time for calculations: Prop calculator gives me the prop power 22.7W Motor takes 8*3.8 = 30.4W, so the efficiency is 22.7/30.4 = 75%. That means the motor gives out 30.4-22.7 = 7.7W in the form of heat. I think is quite not bad. I didn't include the efficeincy of ESC and the current for receiver because it's very marginal. How rpm/V of the motor is measured? can I somehow measure it for my motor? Under load of GWS 8x4.3 the motor is turning 5.33 * 6020 rpm = 32086 rpm, but it depends on the load. without load it sounds like turbine, but I didn't measure the rpm. It's just very high. RysiuM |
|
|
|
|
Joined Nov 2003
176 Posts
|
Thanks to everyone who contributed valueable information in reply to my questions.
Special Thanks to "galloping gimp" for such an illustrated answer !! The information you provided me has been of great help in understanding the complete picture. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
taekwondo -
Quote:
As I am learning, one of the neat things about re-winding your own motor is that you can tailor the motor to the application. There is a lot to learn and many forum threads to be read. It will take you days, but it is worth reading them all from beginning to end. - Jeff |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
AirBorne_AZ -
I still have a whole lot to learn, and I would never claim that my methods are "correct" in any sense of the word. If you read the many threads on this topic, you'll see other construction methods. Because of all the brass in my motor, it is heavier than many CD-ROM conversions. But brass is a material that was readily available and easy to work with, so I used it. Assuming my first motor proves flight-worthy, I fully intend to construct some others, this time with lighter materials. - Jeff |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| One hour CD ROM construction part 7 | rysium | Power Systems | 806 | Dec 18, 2006 02:58 AM |
| One hour CD ROM construction part 6 | arx_n_sparx | Power Systems | 1050 | Mar 10, 2005 07:08 PM |
| One hour CD ROM motor construction PART 4!! | t-turley | Power Systems | 555 | Jun 07, 2004 07:33 PM |
| One Hour CD ROM Construction Part 5 | arx_n_sparx | Power Systems | 537 | May 07, 2004 09:56 AM |
| One hour CD ROM motor construction PART3 | rysium | Power Systems | 511 | Mar 22, 2004 01:03 PM |