SMALL - espritmodel.com SMALL - Telemetry SMALL - Radio
Reply
Thread Tools
Old Oct 01, 2012, 02:13 AM
User
Colorado
Joined Oct 2004
1,424 Posts
Help!
High Endurance UAV, motive/power subsystem??

Working on a high endurance UAV for surveillance applications. The rf-link/control/vision/navigation subsystems are non-issues. Looking for ideas for a motive/power subsystem to meet the following primary operational requirements:

Range: up to 100km.
Ceiling: 3000m ASL.
User Payload: 3kg.
Loitering capability: >8 hours.
AUW: <45kg.

Due to the need for ease of launch (and recovery) a multi-rotor configuration is envisaged although other configurations can be considered.
rmteo is offline Find More Posts by rmteo
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Oct 01, 2012, 02:51 AM
Registered User
Hawaii
Joined Feb 2003
5,958 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmteo View Post
Working on a high endurance UAV for surveillance applications. The rf-link/control/vision/navigation subsystems are non-issues. Looking for ideas for a motive/power subsystem to meet the following primary operational requirements:

Range: up to 100km.
Ceiling: 3000m ASL.
User Payload: 3kg.
Loitering capability: >8 hours.
AUW: <45kg.

Due to the need for ease of launch (and recovery) a multi-rotor configuration is envisaged although other configurations can be considered.
AUW is less than 45 kg? Or did you have a typo and meant 4.5 kg?

For any loiter greater than 8 hours and a range of 100km you are really looking at a fixed wing aircraft with long skinny wing. You will not get a very practical flying machine with the kind of duration with multi rotor. Even with a single main rotor helicopter that is near impossible unless you have a way to refuel.
SeismicCWave is offline Find More Posts by SeismicCWave
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 01, 2012, 03:40 AM
g0t rabb1t?
ABLomas's Avatar
Lietuva, Vilnius
Joined Jul 2011
1,651 Posts
Well, "classic" multirotor won't fit all requirements.
Flying wing will do - but won't be easy to launch and land.
Possibly something like quadshot (just bigger) would be much better hybrid, but won't archieve 8 hours of loitering time anyway (without thermal hunting) with electric engines.
I guess, you could make hybrid with gasoline engine (level fly) and electric engines (maybe with variable pitch) for fine control (yaw) and landing/takeoff, but...
Won't be easy =)
ABLomas is offline Find More Posts by ABLomas
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 01, 2012, 04:44 AM
User
Colorado
Joined Oct 2004
1,424 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeismicCWave View Post
AUW is less than 45 kg? Or did you have a typo and meant 4.5 kg?
Not a typo - 45 kg. for convenient ground handling by a 2-man team.
rmteo is offline Find More Posts by rmteo
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 01, 2012, 05:01 AM
Registered User
Italia, Piemonte, Biella
Joined Feb 2011
395 Posts
i don't think you will get any valuable answers in this forum.. this is hobby grade stuff.. 8 hours flight time is just dreaming for our standards..
i think the only way to achieve it is with a gasser heli or a nuclear fuel cell of some kind...
thepelell is offline Find More Posts by thepelell
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 01, 2012, 10:08 AM
User
Colorado
Joined Oct 2004
1,424 Posts
Looks like a conventional single rotor with a gasoline engine is the way to go. The Yamaha RMAX crop sprayer (246cc gasoline twin) with an AUW of 94kg. has an endurance of 60-90 minutes with a payload capacity of 30kg (equivalent to about 10 gallons of gasoline, which could be used for extending endurance).

rmteo is offline Find More Posts by rmteo
Last edited by rmteo; Oct 01, 2012 at 10:24 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2012, 07:29 AM
User
Colorado
Joined Oct 2004
1,424 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepelell View Post
i don't think you will get any valuable answers in this forum.. this is hobby grade stuff.. 8 hours flight time is just dreaming for our standards..
Agreed, thanks. I am looking for ideas/suggestions that I may have overlooked. For example on another forum https://forum.sparkfun.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=33621, someone suggested a rigid airship, which although not suitable, is something I had not considered.
rmteo is offline Find More Posts by rmteo
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 02, 2012, 12:39 PM
User
Colorado
Joined Oct 2004
1,424 Posts
Another argument for the single rotor configuration. Whilst gas turbines are not known for being particularly fuel efficient, this one using a Rolls Royce turboshaft engine http://defensetech.org/2012/04/17/th...drone-chopper/ and based on a Bell 407 airframe has a payload capacity of 600-700lb. and an endurance of 14 hours. Downside is that AUW is 3,000+lb. and probably costs in the region of US$5 million (based on the a civilian Bell 206 Jet Ranger cost of about US$2 million).

rmteo is offline Find More Posts by rmteo
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion High-Altitude, Super-Endurance FPV acetech09 FPV Talk 7 May 14, 2012 10:13 PM
Discussion Long endurance, High performance UAV Pvillaco UAV - Unmanned Aerial Vehicles 6 Oct 02, 2011 11:02 PM
Discussion High aspect ratio, long endurance UAV. Pvillaco Electric Plane Talk 3 Sep 21, 2011 05:34 PM
Discussion FPV/UAV Endurance Airframe/Power suggestions chkin11 FPV Talk 4 Jan 28, 2011 09:26 AM
Question UAV Subsystems alireza-snake UAV - Unmanned Aerial Vehicles 6 Jul 01, 2009 08:25 PM