this administration lied out of the gate.

Originally Posted by Tim Jonas

every day something else comes out...drip, drip, drip. Now it is that the embassy was denied ample security and somebody signed off on a waiver for that security.

If that statement is true and a document can be produced backing it up then it is the end of Obama.

Remember that both the government and people were friendly. Two out of three ain't bad, but obviously it wasn't enough.

It's much easier to "get" someone in a friendly crowd because you can get much closer, more easily.

Case in point: Arthur Bremer was planning to shoot George Wallace in Wheaton, Maryland earlier that day, but the crowd was hostile and security was tight.

Later that afternoon, the crowd in Laurel was much more supportive, and security loosened up a bit. He got his shot there.

Even media that tends to be more friendly to the President, are expressing concerns over what happened in Benghazi.

"CNN: White House’s story on Benghazi attack really doesn’t add up"

http://michellemalkin.com/2012/10/02...ouse-benghazi/

Cover Up is unfolding people are coming forward and now
We know the State department rejected the cries for more security...head will roll on this one!

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...assy-in-libya/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...ffed-pleas-in/

Originally Posted by aerogel

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...ffed-pleas-in/

Fox news...............

Originally Posted by ENGINETORQUE

Fox news...............

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...assy-in-libya/

I posted two of them...mabey UK news? it is what it is....They did nothing even after cries for help.

Originally Posted by aerogel

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...assy-in-libya/

I posted two of them...mabey UK news? it is what it is....They did nothing even after cries for help.

Not sure what your point is, regardless of source

Are you saying 'resources' were requested and denied ?

I think that's what you're claiming - and if so, well that happens all the time, from intelligence gathering to troops on the ground.

It's a pointless observation - the priority ladder obviously had other items atop the agenda!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/10465699

Originally Posted by aerogel

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/10465699

Clinton put my point across perfectly clearly - from your link above

"There is risk inherent in what we do and what these brave men and women representing the United States are up against every single day," Clinton said, "and we do our very best to limit that risk by ensuring that our security protocols reflect the environments in which diplomats work and the threats that they are presented with." "

NOTE - the word limit (i.e. not eliminate)

While our Ambassador and men were begging for their lives....O administration was literally begging for money...We will see if administration comes clean...but there doing ever thing in there power to hide emails, diary's and pretty much any and ever thing....buts it's all coming out.

The information wants to be free it longs to be free.

This is getting more press and more facts are coming out. The more the truth is known the worse it looks for Obama. It appears his administration cearly dropped the ball and americans died because of it.

Originally Posted by RumRunner_1492

This is getting more press and more facts are coming out. The more the truth is known the worse it looks for Obama. It appears his administration cearly dropped the ball and americans died because of it.

Got to watch out for that

It 'appeared' that 9/11 was a demolition inside job - remember

Originally Posted by ENGINETORQUE

Got to watch out for that

It 'appeared' that 9/11 was a demolition inside job - remember

I stopped paying attention to your thoughts on 9/11 once you came out supporting conspiracy theories. Your position was weak and unsupportable before and now it's simply laughable. Move along.