|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just strapped on my airtime skids. Black / white standard height! Love them, unfortunently the rear post bent a tad on the install causing it to flex a bit. Mainly human error. I plan on buying another low pro set and install them right even tho it still sits sturdy after bending them.
Best thing is you can re seat the main gear easily without removing gear. Batteries are a bit award to maneuver in but after you take the stickers off its quite easy Overall highly recommend them and I can't wait for my lo pro black n whites! |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
That makes perfect sense, but when you get someone like me, who is trying to track down a vibration. It darn near killed me with fear. I was laying on the ground trying to see the blade tracking. I was in the mid position on my DX8 that is about 80% power. I hit the throttle hold, then went to stand up after the rotor was slowing down. Managed to bump the TH. The heli spooled back up to max with me about 3 feet away from it. I screamed like a 9 year old girl. Thank god the throttle stick was bottomed out, or she would have been gone.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
I just switched from dx7 to dx8 and like it execpt it feels like everything is on + expo now.. dx7 seemed a lot more touchy with the sticks... |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Australia, NSW, Newcastle
Joined Jun 2012
314 Posts
|
I have found that while learning with this awesome little wasp that I have moved from +45 expo now starting on +15 on swash from previous +20 (with full rates on all and no expo on rudder). Is there a natural progression from linear pitch curves? I no longer use FM1 as normal mode, and have reprogrammed it to be a V throttle curve, with a flat 100 on FM2 (stunt / IU) and linear pitch curves. Is that as far as it goes or should I start changing it some more? I find that linear suits me, but haven't tried anything else (apart from the normal mode as described in the book).
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Maybe a 0.4module 10t with a 54t maingear could work, gives around 4400rpm and fits the distance between motor and main shafts according to my rough measurements. This is assuming of course that it is powerful enough running on 1s, needs to give at least 30g thrust just to get it airborne. Maybe one of the plane guys has done a thrust test. |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
It's easy to eat up a 10-12 channel tx if you get into the advanced side of the hobby & start flying full-featured, scale aircraft. In addition to the standard 4 channels used on planes, we have retracts, flaps, airbrakes, spoilers, tailerons, variable-pitch props, engine mixture controls, ignition switches, on-board glow drivers, on-board starters, rotating gun turrets, folding wings, swing-wings, bomb-drops, lighting systems, articulated canopies - and a bunch of stuff that I probably forgot. BTW - telemetry modules don't eat up any tx channels, and separate channels are not typically used for multiple servos on a single control surface. A servo synchronizer is used for that. Joel |
|
|
Latest blog entry: Eflite UMX Sbach 3D on 3s - 2300Kv/5043...
|
||
|
|
||
|
Australia, NSW, Newcastle
Joined Jun 2012
314 Posts
|
Quote:
Is that 4400rpm @ 3.7v with 80% also??? I haven't seen a thrust test but I fail to see how that helps here (once again, my ignorance), as they are using fixed pitch props over a card sheet on scales. whereas we have collective pitch, and use neg p for thrust test directly on scales. Would the two different test's have a similar result? Is the nano full neg pitch equal to that of the umx props? ![]() Could we not assume that if the stock has X thrust at Y pitch under Z load @ 4200 rpm, then X thrust would be greater @ 4400rpm (provided the weight is not dramatically altered)??? |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Australia, NSW, Newcastle
Joined Jun 2012
314 Posts
|
Quote:
Wow, I never even imagined how I would be able to convince the mrs for a DX18. Now I have the best excuse ever, "Joel told me I needed it"
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
With a given prop, thrust increases at the square of the RPM. A 2x increase in RPM will provide a 4x increase in thrust - assuming the tips don't go transonic & the prop doesn't flex.
Joel |
|
Latest blog entry: Eflite UMX Sbach 3D on 3s - 2300Kv/5043...
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cool Walkera MiNi CP - Smallest 100 sized 3D helicopter | zadaw | Micro Helis | 5181 | May 13, 2013 01:16 PM |
| Discussion is there anything better than mcpx v2 at same or smaller size? | Legendary_Agent | 3D Electric Heli Flying | 33 | Feb 24, 2012 08:46 PM |
| Question What’s Better than a Blade CP and Smaller than a Trex? | HavingFun2002 | Micro Helis | 74 | Mar 05, 2006 05:07 PM |