SMALL - espritmodel.com SMALL - Telemetry SMALL - Radio
Reply
Thread Tools
Old Sep 20, 2012, 03:45 PM
Parkfly Padawan
JForbes's Avatar
United States, PA, Waynesburg
Joined Aug 2011
979 Posts
Do you all feel the 18g mg servo's are the best way to go as well?
JForbes is offline Find More Posts by JForbes
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Sep 20, 2012, 03:51 PM
3D Hack
JC Spohr's Avatar
United States, IL, Glen Carbon
Joined Jul 2010
1,925 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsam View Post
thin electric

Thanks.

Looks like cdee posted the answer a moment before I posed the question.

JC
JC Spohr is offline Find More Posts by JC Spohr
RCG Plus Member
Last edited by JC Spohr; Sep 21, 2012 at 09:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 20, 2012, 03:57 PM
Registered User
toolman18's Avatar
United States, TX, Portland
Joined Apr 2008
248 Posts
I have the omega 103 and it pulls fantastic on 11x7 TE prop. The motor came down only slightly warm after 6 min. I also only put 1200 back into a 2200 nanotech.
toolman18 is offline Find More Posts by toolman18
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 21, 2012, 01:10 AM
Registered User
Joined Jan 2009
399 Posts
Thank you very much, excellent guidelines.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdee View Post
I did a fair amount of testing with a Watts Up meter and another device that would read Kv and RPM.

Testing included both the 78g (2810/11) and 100g (A2814/8T) motors from Twisted Hobbys Motors hooked to the 45amp Twisted Hobbys ESC.

sf = slow fly / te = thin electric both styles were APC (or equiv.)

78g motor
=========================
11x3.8sf / 26.2A
11x4.7sf / 31.5A
12x3.8sf / 34.7A
------------------
11x5.5te / 27.7A
12x6.0te / 30.5A


100g motor
==========================
11x3.8sf / 33.8A
11x4.7sf / 36.5A
12x3.8sf / 41.2A
---------------------
11x5.5te / 25.9A
11x7.0te / 30.3A
12x6.0te / 31.6A

Please note that this data is for reference only. I am working on a more comprehensive chart for these two motors that I will post here sometime in the next week or so, chart will include Watts, RPM, Voltage, ESC timing, etc, etc

Hope this helps, if not let me know.
.
cdee
.
Slats! is offline Find More Posts by Slats!
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2012, 10:35 PM
Registered User
Joined Jan 2009
399 Posts
What are you guys thinking a good pack weight is for this after flying it for a while.

I have 4 Rhino 1750 25c that I am going to use they weigh 145g. Thing is I want some new packs and have been on a Hyperion kick.

The 1600 hyp weighs only 128 grams the 2100 is still only 163g. Pretty light.

As a comparison the 1800 Nano weighs 161g.

I want it light but wonder if 128 may give some issues.

I will be using the 100g TH motor to start so saving some weight is not a bad thing.
Slats! is offline Find More Posts by Slats!
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2012, 12:24 AM
Team Twisted!
cdee's Avatar
United States, CO, Denver
Joined Jun 2011
1,819 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slats! View Post
What are you guys thinking a good pack weight is for this after flying it for a while.

I have 4 Rhino 1750 25c that I am going to use they weigh 145g. Thing is I want some new packs and have been on a Hyperion kick.

The 1600 hyp weighs only 128 grams the 2100 is still only 163g. Pretty light.

As a comparison the 1800 Nano weighs 161g.

I want it light but wonder if 128 may give some issues.

I will be using the 100g TH motor to start so saving some weight is not a bad thing.
The lighter batteries should not be an issue if you want to use them, especially with the bigger motor. When I have the nano-tech 1600s in the plane, they are almost completely under the wing, this is with 4x 18g servos installed and no landing gear.
.
cdee
.
cdee is offline Find More Posts by cdee
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23, 2012, 10:46 AM
Registered User
toolman18's Avatar
United States, TX, Portland
Joined Apr 2008
248 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slats! View Post
What are you guys thinking a good pack weight is for this after flying it for a while.

I have 4 Rhino 1750 25c that I am going to use they weigh 145g. Thing is I want some new packs and have been on a Hyperion kick.

The 1600 hyp weighs only 128 grams the 2100 is still only 163g. Pretty light.

As a comparison the 1800 Nano weighs 161g.

I want it light but wonder if 128 may give some issues.

I will be using the 100g TH motor to start so saving some weight is not a bad thing.
I am using the 1600 genisis batteries from Banana hobbies. They are great. I also have tried the 2200 nanotechs. They are good also but i like the lighter batteries better.
toolman18 is offline Find More Posts by toolman18
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2012, 10:29 AM
Registered User
Mike Smart's Avatar
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, Great Britain (UK)
Joined Jan 2000
3,035 Posts
For any of you who have this and the Telink Yak or Extra Slick - how do they compare?

Mike
Mike Smart is online now Find More Posts by Mike Smart
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2012, 08:11 PM
Don't give in to gravity
Gravitycheat's Avatar
USA, FL, Palm Harbor
Joined Dec 2009
1,959 Posts
Hey Guys. This is a video of a buddy of mine Brad, flying his Sbach. We had a very windy day but Brad and the Sbach handled it very well. Enjoy

C:UsersShawn DuBoisVideosBrad flying the Sbach (3 min 50 sec)
Gravitycheat is offline Find More Posts by Gravitycheat
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2012, 08:29 PM
Registered User
toolman18's Avatar
United States, TX, Portland
Joined Apr 2008
248 Posts
Wish I had known you were filming. I would have mixed it up a bit more. It did handle the wind great though. I don't have many videos of me flying so I will cherish that one. Thanks Shawn. You da man. Lets get some groupers tomorrow.
toolman18 is offline Find More Posts by toolman18
Reply With Quote
Old Sep 30, 2012, 06:10 PM
Don't give in to gravity
Gravitycheat's Avatar
USA, FL, Palm Harbor
Joined Dec 2009
1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Smart View Post
For any of you who have this and the Telink Yak or Extra Slick - how do they compare?

Mike
Hello Mike,

Sorry for the delay in responding to your post. I have both the Sbach and Slick. They are both great flying planes. I do like the sbach better because it feels more like a balsa plane when your flying it than the Slick does. To me it feels more responsive, it tracks truer and it carries more inertia for better tumbling and snap maneuvers.
If learning better 3D or extreme aerobatics is your goal, I think the Sbach is a step closer to balsa in the chain than the slick is. What I mean is, what you learn with the Sbach will carry over to a balsa better than what you would gain from flying the Slick.

Don’t get me wrong. I have both and like both, they just fill different flying needs.

Shawn
Gravitycheat is offline Find More Posts by Gravitycheat
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 01, 2012, 04:28 AM
Registered User
Mike Smart's Avatar
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, Great Britain (UK)
Joined Jan 2000
3,035 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gravitycheat View Post
Hello Mike,

Sorry for the delay in responding to your post. I have both the Sbach and Slick. They are both great flying planes. I do like the sbach better because it feels more like a balsa plane when your flying it than the Slick does. To me it feels more responsive, it tracks truer and it carries more inertia for better tumbling and snap maneuvers.
If learning better 3D or extreme aerobatics is your goal, I think the Sbach is a step closer to balsa in the chain than the slick is. What I mean is, what you learn with the Sbach will carry over to a balsa better than what you would gain from flying the Slick.

Don’t get me wrong. I have both and like both, they just fill different flying needs.

Shawn
Thanks Shawn,

I have both the Telink Yak and Extra Slick and I'm wondering whether to try the SBach. I have balsa models, but a little more response and precision in a foamie would be interesting for me. Do the fuselage stiffening pieces keep the tail square during manoeuvres?

Mike
Mike Smart is online now Find More Posts by Mike Smart
Last edited by Mike Smart; Oct 01, 2012 at 06:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 01, 2012, 06:48 AM
3D Hack
JC Spohr's Avatar
United States, IL, Glen Carbon
Joined Jul 2010
1,925 Posts
Mike,

The Sbach is unbelievably precise for a foamie. It is very "balsa" like.

It tracks so well that I'd say the tail must not be twisting in flight.

JC
JC Spohr is offline Find More Posts by JC Spohr
RCG Plus Member
Latest blog entry: About Me
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 01, 2012, 07:14 AM
Registered User
Mike Smart's Avatar
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, Great Britain (UK)
Joined Jan 2000
3,035 Posts
Thanks JC, sounds promising

Mike
Mike Smart is online now Find More Posts by Mike Smart
Reply With Quote
Old Oct 01, 2012, 07:53 AM
3D Hack
JC Spohr's Avatar
United States, IL, Glen Carbon
Joined Jul 2010
1,925 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Smart View Post
Thanks JC, sounds promising

Mike
You're welcome Mike.

I forgot to mention that I also have the Telink SU-29 and between the two planes - i prefer the Sbach.

Both are great but the Sbach has the edge in precision and flies lighter.

JC
JC Spohr is offline Find More Posts by JC Spohr
RCG Plus Member
Latest blog entry: About Me
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Twisted Hobbys - RC Factory USA Sbach 342 39" Build Thread & Flight Video!!!!! aerofundan 3D Foamies 485 Jul 17, 2014 10:24 AM
Discussion Twisted Hobbys - RC Factory USA YAK-55 39" Build Thread/Videos & Flight Video!!!!! cbriggs11 3D Foamies 78 May 28, 2014 05:40 PM
Discussion NEW Twisted Hobbys/ParkAero RC Factory 31" Sbach 342 Greengiant 3D Foamies 130 Jan 24, 2013 01:49 PM
Discussion NEW RC Factory-Park Aero/Twisted Hobbys 31" Sbach 342 Greengiant 3D Flying 0 Nov 04, 2011 11:34 AM
Discussion RC Factory USA - Twisted Hobbys - 1.2m SU 29 Build Thread. hercdriver7777 3D Foamies 97 Oct 19, 2011 06:34 AM