|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North vancouver, B.C. Canada
Joined Apr 2008
16,101 Posts
|
You are a cool guy
Flying up high and into the wind will be good choice When you come back home you can fly lower as you come back Still turn around and get feel for video as slight angles make world of difference ie good idea to manually aim video rx antenna Also further away than closer gives better video, as it all depends on set up Wind and height will be your friend ![]() ![]() Try ground range tests with video as well as rc Do both tests with each on and of respectively Test for video and rc control on ground Be careful of low volts with video Regulators also can make video go in and out poorly with rapid voltage change, or low volts So when poor video turn down or off motor till closer to home Sometimes going out is better video but practice with better video in than out Ie tilt omni slightly 2 degrees forward as example on plane,, This also is a test for video on the ground Practice on simulators for google earth with flight sim and slowest plane flaps down Close your eyes and reopen them tp practice orienteering with no video Motor on and elevator up, rudder left, is good video fail safe setting, as it will regain video as an example Flying with no video is a rush ![]() Not a better feeling than regaining video while always having rc control |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Here is why: I have 3 antennas. all 1280 mhz. cloverleaf, biquad, helical. hooked to 2 eagle eyes. cloverleaf is primary, I rarely get a diversity change within 5000 feet. out over 5000 feet, it quickly changes to the biquad. there is static that develops before the switch, but the biquad takes over too fast so I can't see the static limits. Then as I get further out... I start to see a consistent pattern develop. Not a sudden 1 second burst which happens now and then. but a faint static consistent pattern then my helical takes over at 15,000 feet out (LOS, legal altitude over forest I love where I live). I have not gone far enough to see static on the helical. |
|
|
||
|
|
||||
|
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
Latest blog entry: Travel Quad
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Australia, VIC, Melbourne
Joined Sep 2001
283 Posts
|
Hey, a good demonstration & some good pointers there scrtsqrl.
Nogas, you could place a RF attenuator on your VTX that would simulate long range at a much shorter distance, as you walk away you would see gradual degradation of your signal. I know this wouldn't actually test your range but it would demonstrate what you would see. Just an idea. Regards, John |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denmark, Region Zealand, Greve Strand
Joined Oct 2008
95 Posts
|
Hi Nogas
I to am new to FPV (had my first FPV flight yesterday )I have been using the last 4-5 months to learn about this FPV stuff and i still feel like a newbie ![]() But i belive your main question was how the picture degrades in flight That is a tuff one - but if you look at " Yet Another Newbie 5.8GHz Setup - A Catalog of Statics " here on RCG you will find a series of pictures of different situations where the picture degrades ![]() Hope this helps ![]() Jan |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
The video degrades pretty slowly, ESPECIALLY on 5.8Ghz. Even if you get complete snow and continue flying, the signal in almost all cases (well, in all I stressed this) returns. Not to say that you should force it that bad, but it will not cut out immediately. Depending on where you live, be aware that 1.2Ghz as well as 900Mhz can be illegal, not so with 2.4 or 5.8Ghz. Markus |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks everyone, after many flights over the last month or so i have had the oppurtunity to test my set ups capabilities. Some 'testing' was encouraging, other 'testing' didn't end so well.
![]() But all in all, what Markus said is bang on what i have found. The video quality generally fades out gradually, unless LOS is interrupted (realised by unintentional 'signal penetration testing' that didn't end so well) ![]() What i have found so far is that everything seems to be trade off. When improving one aspect of my system i tend to lose in another area. But i guess that is one of the fundamentals of life. ![]() At the moment i have only pushed out to about 1.5 kms and the video has generally been good but at that range i was getting some noise / graininess that i think had to do with my wiring and component layout. I have recently changed the layout to improve component and wiring seperation but now my plane flies like a pig. I am hoping to get a chance to do some ground level range testing of all components this weekend to try to isolate the problem areas. Fun and games..........
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help! Reduced 2.4Ghz range when 1Ghz video link is active - how to minimize problem ? | AlCapone | Video Piloting (FPV/RPV) | 4 | Feb 09, 2012 02:38 AM |
| Question How do I know when my battery is done charging on my thunder ac6? | skarface | Batteries and Chargers | 5 | Jan 19, 2012 07:00 AM |
| Discussion Anyone know how to get this unit that will track a moving object? | Duck! | Aerial Photography | 7 | Nov 03, 2011 04:15 PM |