|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It has been found that even a day will degrade cells some. The higher the C rating the faster they degrade.
Even one of the battery guru's of yesteryear put his tail between his legs last year and agreed with everydayflyer by admitting he was wrong. If you want it in black and white buy two 3s high C packs, seperate the cells so you have 6 cells and test away...or just take edf's advise and save time and $$$. ![]() Rick |
|
Latest blog entry: mean well S-210-12 power supply
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Perhaps RC Groups need a certification program for posters.
Go here and read the notice in bold type under each LiPoly's decription http://www.xtremepowersystems.net/products.php?cat=16 Go to the Battery Graph Vault and wade thru my test on Lipolys over hundreds of cycles and over a three years storage test period. Take the easy way out and treat them as you wish as they are yours. Some enjoy repalcing Lipolys often but some pay top dollar for the best and expect them to last . Gio here and see what a pioneer in LiPoly sells had to say. http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showp...&postcount=994 The long version for those who do not know how to open threads http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showp...&postcount=991 Snip: Quote:
Charles |
|
|
|
|
|
United States, TX, Comal
Joined Dec 2011
43 Posts
|
Well if I want a good steak I could stick my head up a bulls arse and see for myself or I can just take the butchers word for it....I think I'll take your word for it Everyday flyer. you seem to be the knowledgeable butcher here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I use Sanyo Eneloops in my Transmitters and a couple of transmitters which I seldom use often go 6 months or more on a charge but to get back to your question.
LiPolys used in Transmitters or other extremly low drain applications do not suffer issues with high IR. Most Transmitter LiPolys are only rated 2C or so and most transmitter place less than a 1/10C load on them. Improper storage causes LiPolys to develop higher internal resistance faster. A high C one becomes a lower C one. If you use a 20C LiPoly in a Slow Stick and get 20 to 40 minutes of flight time it really does not matter much how you store it. It will still work fine It may puff and lose some capacity but most would still find its' performance OK. If you purchase 30,45,50,60C LiPolys because you need the performane and you do not keep them at Storage when not being flown they will lose performance before you get many cycles out of them. Remember not all flyers have the same needs. Some purchase only low cost LiPolys and could care less it they last more than one summer of flying. Some purchase very expensive LIPolys and would prefer to get two or three years (seasons) of useage from them. Some like mysellf fly perhaps a thousand flights a year and some fly 40 at most. Charles . |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Joined Jan 2012
87 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|||
|
|
||
|
|
ToBeFrank
Quote:
I am not going to post a page to try and prove a point to you as you have decided I am clueless and you are a LiPoly expert. I am going to do you and myself a very large favor and add you to my ignor list. I could care less how you miss mangage your LiPolys and those who to follow your lead will make better LiPoly customers for their prefered vendors as they will be purchasing more often. Good bye Charles |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Space Coast
Joined Oct 2000
18,595 Posts
|
Quote:
I've read many technical articles that concluded that storage at a 100% charge level greatly shortened the cycle life and resulted in capacity loss. All were long term exposure to full charge conditions. Consider this for the sake of argument. We know that the loss of cycle life/capacity is not recoverable, it is an irreversable reaction. Considering that, can it be concluded that every second under a full charge stress is taking some amount of "life" from the pack? I would think so. Is the degree of degradation independent of the battery charge state between full charge time periods? Does 24 hours of full charge stress cause the same amount of damage whether done in 1 hour increments or all at once? I'm not aware of any studies done on that basis, however, the satellite 'people' did research on using li-ion batteries and concluded that the charge level should be maintained between 3.8 - 4v for maximum cycle life which might support the 'all full charge stress is additive" argument. Adding to the complexity of the subject is that manufacturers are probably using proprietary solvents which may influence how sensitive their cells are to full charge degradation. In my experience, todays packs are more sensitive to full charge storage "puffing" than those from a few years ago. Do people fret about it? Some do, some don't. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion Does Lipo Need To Be Fully Charged Before Putting In Storage Mode? | itsme2 | Batteries and Chargers | 6 | Jul 21, 2011 06:06 PM |
| Discussion Storage voltage vs. fully charged. | solar696 | Batteries and Chargers | 4 | Aug 25, 2010 09:54 PM |
| Discussion Storing Lipo Batteries Fully Charged! | SuperHornet | Batteries and Chargers | 14 | Nov 26, 2009 08:15 AM |
| Discussion Lipo fully charged storage? | ViperR | Coaxial Helicopters | 4 | Sep 09, 2007 02:37 PM |
| Lipo fully charged? | Rugar | Batteries and Chargers | 5 | Sep 03, 2004 11:15 AM |