Bill,
To make up a 2" differential is going to need a hell of an angle alteration to make it in line with the CG position

. Something I wouldn't try myself but I have never tried it so cannot comment. If one of my fixed wings were nosing down I would try to find another way around things rather than adding up thrust to try to over come the problem. Plus in theory the thrust of the motor will alter in relation ship to the rotor flying angle?
Joe,
I would go with blade 'C' if it were me, with the AUW I would aim to at least get the thrust line in line with the CG with a tolerance of no more than 5mm above.
I played with this gap last year with REX and the only way I could control the pitch down under power when the gap was increased was to increase the rotor length. I tried AB blades at a shorter length and this did not work, so it seems the gap can be increased but its drag at play that is counteracting the upper thrust line. This was done with only a 2 blade set up so it may well be different with 3?
With a full tailplane the thrust line is not so critical as it acts as a damper, the further it is away from the prop the more it can control it. My Tempest thrust line is 3" -4" above the CG and that flies fine, but it has a lot of tailplane area. I am not sure it would dampen a thrust line under the CG though?
Dave needs too loose some weight around the top and increase it some how lower down I think.
Hope the info is of use?
Regards
Rich