|
|
|
|
|
|
So. Cal.
Joined Oct 2004
6,179 Posts
|
Hi all,
As promised, I have started to compile all of the reported results in the database thread. They're located in the .zip file in post #1. Not complete yet but I'm better than half way through and wanted to get some feedback on its usefulness. Cheers, Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Mar 2011
43 Posts
|
Wayne, I want to thank you for your work on this thread and I have began reading your "Lipo C Rating" thread as well. It does not surprise me how manufacturers make these wild claims just to make a sale at the expense of deceiving customers.
Back on topic, I have searched but can not find anything specific on the TP 1800 3S packs IR values so I can only assume based on the larger capacity TP data on this thread that the same issue applies to the smaller packs. Coincidentally i was also recommended Boost lipos which have similar claims. Now I was led to this site by another manufacturer which claims a much lower True C rating for their batteries and told me: "You will see that for a cell of 1500mAh it requires an IR of less than 1mΩ to support 65C. IR's that low are completely unheard of, especially in mini-type packs. True IR's in these mini-type packs are typically in the 6 to 8 mΩ range and higher." I guess my question is are the TP lipos even slightly better than a 25C lipo of the same size 3S 1500-1800mAh or is their IR rating basically the same as their competitors and not even worth the price tag. I don't suspect the 40C rating you mentioned is the TP or Boost lipos which has been tested for 40C continuous? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
So. Cal.
Joined Oct 2004
6,179 Posts
|
Wayne is absolutely correct. 65C continuous for a full discharge is currently preposterous and would result in a damaged pack. TP is obviously not alone in their propensity for making unsubstantiated performance claims. This trend is currently an epidemic and precisely why this thread and the tool exists.
This does not mean that the TP packs are not great lipolys and worthy of their price. Only the consumer can make that assessment. For a typical sport flyer, there may be better options. For competitive racers, the TP packs may prove to be a bargain. ![]() Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Mar 2011
43 Posts
|
Mark, i see your participation in this thread and I thank you as well for shedding a light on this issue.
Your statement about TP to me is a little confusing, if the rating is overrated to boost sales does that not mean the price they are asking is not worth the value you are receiving. I guess a better question is what would you recommend for me looking at a 3S lipo between 1500-1800mAh. I'm going to be running two of them in parallel in a car with a Neu motor which is capable of drawing 1000W which equates to 90A Max draw (1000w / 11.1v = 90A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
So. Cal.
Joined Oct 2004
6,179 Posts
|
My statement merely meant that the TP lipolys may be the absolute best available and some are willing to pay whatever price the seller demands to obtain the best available performance.
500W from any 3S 1500-1800mAh lipoly is asking a lot and would lead to a short life if this is a continuous or average power draw. I have my doubts whether the TP's or any other lipoly can handle this on a repeated basis. I typically consult the data in the lipoly performance database thread and other scattered threads when making purchase decisions. I have only seen a few reports on the "65C" TP's but they seemed to offer great performance. I have never purchased any TP packs myself but then my typical flight times are between 4-15 minutes so I tend to purchase packs more in the 'budget' end of the spectrum. My current favorites are 25C Hyperion CX and 25C Gens Ace. Mark |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Rugby, UK
Joined Feb 2007
720 Posts
|
Quote:
In terms of IR and hence C ratings, I don't believe that they are particularly outstanding. Mark is right to point out that 'C' rating is not the only criteria in buying a lipo. The problem is that it is too often used as a dishonest sales claim. Wayne |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
Joined Mar 2011
43 Posts
|
Quote:
This Neu motor is highly efficient which is why I decided to use it over a big block conversion. The issue is finding the right batteries that can actually supply the power it needs without melting or ballooning up. I have looked at three options based on recommendations between TP, Boost and SPC. My concern with SPC was not enough Max Amps to feed the motor, while the TP and Boost claims were much higher made it a obvious decision until i read this thread which has given me a totally new perspective. The problem is most people look at what is advertised which is the C rating and not IR. So unless i can get some first hand hobbyist to tell me what they have actually measured out of the 3 different packs I have to rely on data from much larger capacity lipos to come to a conclusion, hence my problem in choosing the correct lipo Quote:
|
||
|
|||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Product Cell Internal Resistance Meter - more useful than 'C' ratings - Now available. | PLD | Batteries and Chargers | 468 | Oct 05, 2012 10:02 PM |
| Discussion Lipo C-ratings puzzle: what's most important, C-rating or mAh capacity?? | Merlin45 | Batteries and Chargers | 18 | Apr 03, 2010 04:45 PM |
| Idea Proposal for simple lipo performance figures of merit | kgfly | Batteries and Chargers | 8 | Oct 29, 2009 05:55 PM |
| Question What is the formula for lipo discharge amps? C ratings and such? | skid_68 | Batteries and Chargers | 6 | Nov 10, 2005 08:10 AM |
| LiPo "C" Ratings: Useful? | RD Blakeslee | Batteries and Chargers | 121 | Mar 17, 2005 10:02 PM |