|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand, Hawke's Bay, Havelock North
Joined Dec 2004
1,038 Posts
|
I am using the JR DMSS radios (XG8 and as of this week, also the XG11) with the altimeter sensor. The altimeter sensor isn't much bigger than a servo connector. I suspect that the majority of the weight is in the ~6-8" of wire between the plug and the sensor...
(US source: http://www.horizonhobby.com/products...-dmss-JRP03432) |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Since the web site gives no info, could you give us a brief over veiw of how it works and what and how it reports the info? Joe |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Just as it was telling me 2700' a calm voice behind me said "the idea is to get the plane back." Thanks for the good advice and use of the Pic Capt'n Jack. I do know what 150" looks like at 2700' now, about like a DLG at 300'. Joe |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Model Aviation July 1975
I included the write up on the Lake Charles Nats planning in the hopes that there will be a better understanding for the planning that goes into the show.
I hope everyone takes a moment to thank those that GIVE their time to make Glider Camp fun. Dan Pruss covers the class wars of the day. Joe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thermaler, it seems that you somehow accidentally deleted my post just before post #6. All it said was "The idea of classifying sailplanes according to square inches sounds interesting. I wonder why it was changed", and it had been there since last January, so I'm sure it was just an accident. Perhaps you can clarify what happened.
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee
Joined Sep 2003
2,218 Posts
|
I attended the 1974 meeting at Silver Springs Maryland meeting of the National Soaring Society where AMA rules for soaring were compiled from the many rules used by the various soaring clubs. This is what I wrote about the meeting.
About the only thing arousing much controversy was the definition of Standard class. Standard class was defined as having a 100-inch span with no other restrictions by the short lived National Radio Control Soaring Society (NRCSS) in 1970. This definition was picked up by the LSF and carried over to the SOAR Nats in 1972. In 1973, the ECSS decided that they wanted a low cost class for beginner and restricted standard class to rudder and elevator only. Nobody noticed that there were no two channel radios available at that time so every radio used for their standard class models had at least three channels. After much haggling, the NSS decided to support the LSF definition of Standard class since that was what was used in most of the country. In 1974, the Radio Control Contest Board (RCCB) voted on all AMA contest rules for every RC event. Separate contest boards for RC Aerobatics, RC Pylon Racing, and RC Soaring were not established until about 10 years later. None of the Contest Board members were sailplane fliers so they depended on the Soaring Advisory Committee and later the NSS for advice on sailplane matters but didn’t always follow their recommendations. A rules change proposal to split Standard Class into two groups with one being restricted to rudder and elevator only was submitted to the RCCB by some members of the old ECSS. The RCCB went against the NSS recommendation and accepted the proposal to split standard class. Ironically, the new class was defined as Standard Class while the original standard class became Modified Standard Class. Within a few years, Standard class was back to the original definition established by NSRCC in 1970. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined May 2012
21 Posts
|
Hi Joe, I know a web store that you may interested:
http://www.r2hobbies.com/rc-aircraft...sailplane.html |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Joined May 2012
21 Posts
|
Quote:
http://www.r2hobbies.com/rc-aircraft...sailplane.html
|
|
|
||