|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia, VIC, Melbourne
Joined Nov 2006
6,204 Posts
|
Well that was all an interesting post-flight-mortem.....
1) CofG was 140mm. A bit nose heavy!! I had to move the battery to the very rear of the tray to get 160mm with gear down, and 155mm with gear up. So that seems the best place for it, for now. But that meant the BECs had to be moved right to the front of the battery tray instead, and some rewiring for them. 2) The TV nozzles were tilted DOWN a bit. I had aligned the 'thin bar/lines' they have at the top and sides to the socket 'lip'. But this time when I checked I used the 'front rim' of the foam nozzle, all the way around, and its gap to the fuselage form of the exhaust, and by checking that method it showed it was clearly amiss. So I aligned them that way - which seems the best way to get a truly accurate nozzle alignment. 3) The elevator up trim was still approx 8mm (front elevator to fuselage tip). But I guess fighting downwards tilted TV nozzles AND 140mm CofG needed that! LOL 4) It turns out that I had actually programmed a "take-off" mode on my second flight mode switch, that tilts elevator upwards by a few mm and the TV's the same angle upwards. I guess I did it that same day as posting about that (while the Su was still being repaired), but I didn't update my flight prep sheet and totally forgot about it. "Tuning in" that take-off mode setting will be the scarey part!! Start small and build up! Or..... back-flip right from take-off! hehe .... Hopefully the weather is better than predicted tomorrow morning! It is already windy even now at 1am..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia, VIC, Melbourne
Joined Nov 2006
6,204 Posts
|
Too windy this morning....
I weighed it - 3450g all ready to fly. I probably have not weighed it since changing to the HETs, so they would have been 150g or more weight increase over the L2855's (with the ESC's changed to 90A from 60A ones), plus then the repair/strengthening plywood plate totals. So I think mine used to be 3200g area originally (I have never used the stock fan/motors). Plus I use 5800mAH batteries. My Me-262 weighs almost exactly the same and it flies just about dead right now. But it is a very different airframe (much more like a P-51 than a modern jet). I would say the Su take-off and landing process was ideal, but then that was even with its "Mad setup" of nose heavy and TV's downwards! So they must make those two processes (all processes!) at least some amount abnormal and it will be interesting to see what the more "Properly setup" Su will do then. I guess the higher nose/AoA meant it MUST have that stance when on its wheels and thus it still took off 'properly', plus my own real-time elevator control just made it fly away fine - albeit under higher drag duress overall. And then by the time it is trimmed to fly level, and again doing all the real-time things needed to make it do as you want, meant the landing process was also fine. You can make almost anything fly - I have flown all manners of "badly out of whack" planes over time..... it is just a matter of what performance it will have, but in straight-forward paths (like level flight, take-off, landing) the control you input to form the path required is easily enough to make that goal unfold. eg Landing.... nose heavy, tail heavy, correct CofG, it doesn't matter as far as you can still make it approach at AoA "X", and decent rate "Y", in all cases - just the speed it does that at (and the throttle required) will alter a bit. I don't know how I aligned the TV's originally - it should have been that same "use their dash mark on the TV" way - but I don't recall having almost any trim needed, and it didn't drag the tail through turns notably like this time. So I am fairly sure it was nothing like it was this time (TV's down) and it certainly wasn't nose heavy then either. So maybe the TV down factor is not a huge input (it would have been about 2 or 3 degrees at least) and the majority came from nose heaviness. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
I was hoping to fly in a week or so......looking for USA dealer..... Just the fan rotor...... |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Joined Aug 2012
76 Posts
|
If you cant find any blades, i could sell you some spares i have. I switched to a new ducted fan so i probably wont use the Freewing again. you would need to pay me what BH sells them for and shipping from Cal and paypal fees but if you have no other way, I would be willing. PM if you need. the other bad thing is I am in California.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
High Orbit.....
Joined Jun 2009
4,941 Posts
|
Quote:
Why did you send it back in? Screen glitch or something else. I've held off getting one hoping it would give them time to get the kinks out. I'd hate to have to send it in at all. |
|
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Product Brand New SU-35! 70x2,TV and made by Freewing!Update:Worldwide Availability | neversommer | Foamy EDFs | 593 | Jan 09, 2012 09:02 PM |
| Discussion LX F-35 Vs Freewing F-35 | Mmarshall | Foamy EDFs | 16 | Dec 27, 2011 03:40 PM |
| For Sale Freewing SU-34 stock battery - Brand New | JGuilty13 | Aircraft - Electric - Batteries & Chargers (FS/W) | 0 | Nov 29, 2011 02:01 PM |
| For Sale Freewing SU-34 stock battery | JGuilty13 | Aircraft - Electric - Jets (FS/W) | 0 | Nov 29, 2011 10:29 AM |
| Wanted SU-34 Freewing | lw777pilot | Aircraft - Electric - Jets (FS/W) | 0 | Apr 30, 2011 03:29 AM |