|
|
| View Poll Results: Should the Aerial Photo contests require new pics, or allow previously posted ones? | |||
| New pics only, taken during the 2 week contest window |
|
29 | 76.32% |
| Users can pick an archive shot they've posted before |
|
9 | 23.68% |
| Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newark, DE
Joined Nov 2001
2 Posts
|
I follow several photo competitions, such as the Canon camera competition on pbase.
http://www.pbase.com/ctfchallenge/ (By the way, the current topic is "Flight") In these contests there are "eligible" and "exibition" catagories. Eligible pictures must be taken after the subject is posted, exibition is for archive and other pictures. (Eligible pictures also must be taken with a Canon camera.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mike, that was my running-gag attempt at humor. I've put in an obviously photoshopped (or outright hand drawn) picture as a joke now in the last several contests. Figured it would be obvious, though maybe I should have made it more so. Muy baad.
![]() The past few contests have contained suggestions to follow a "gentleman's agreement" to submit only new shots. I'm relatively ambivalent on this as a hard and fast rule. I can see an advantage in requiring new shots to provide a competitive spirit, but how can it be enforced? Another thing that wasn't fully addressed by this poll was the distinction between truly new shots or simply shots not previously posted or otherwise made available through a linked gallery. My self-portrait entry came from a sortie that was either a few days before or after the subject announcement. I shared a few shots from this flight, but not the one in question. Tug, I believe, just got into the air for the first time during the contest, posted lots of shots on another thread, then reposted his self-portrait. If this was the only one he could get, I wouldn't want to see it excluded. I'm not for getting too heavy with the rules. I would suggest that the standard notice at the opening of the contest thread include encouragment for new or previously unposted shots over reruns, yet not forbid such shots. Viewers who favor only new shots can apply this bias in their voting, and those who favor "anything goes" entries can similarly ignore this factor. Even the best shot in the world will get old after it's been seen enough. This contest works, IMHO, because it's relatively informal. The faster pacing (submission period used to be a whole month) takes a bit of pressure off, knowing that if I'm not happy with what I have this time, that a fresh chance to compete is just around the corner. Final word: let all entries stand, including the submissions so far in the current contest. If a suspected fake is entered, let it stand to draw ridicule, then fall on its face during the vote. Oww, finger cramps from typing. ![]() Karl |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Please VOTE for your favorite aerial photo in our 16th contest | eBird | Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) | 0 | Apr 17, 2004 01:37 PM |
| Please VOTE for your favorite aerial photo in our 16th contest | eBird | Foamies (Kits) | 0 | Apr 17, 2004 01:36 PM |
| Please VOTE for your favorite aerial photo in our 16th contest | eBird | Parkflyers | 0 | Apr 17, 2004 01:35 PM |
| Please VOTE for our aerial photo contest | eBird | Sailplane Talk | 0 | Jun 16, 2003 05:30 PM |
| Please VOTE for our aerial photo contest | eBird | Fuel Plane Talk | 0 | Jun 16, 2003 04:59 PM |