| View Poll Results: Which is better ARC or MEGA? | |||
| ARC 28-58-1 |
|
6 | 28.57% |
| MEGA 16-40-1 |
|
15 | 71.43% |
| Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Jul 2011
109 Posts
|
Just to clarify, what I mean by "better" is:
1. Which has higher quality 2. Which will withstand being run harder, and run above their specs 3. Which runs more efficiently 4. If two motors with similar ratings were (such as the 16/40/1 and 28-58-1) were run in identical setups, which would give the most output? -I understand that the ARC 28-58-1 has a higher kv (3180) than Mega 16/40/1 (3150kv) but when put under load, which would be closer to it's kv rating? |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Quote:
2. The mega 3. the mega 4. the mega. The mega is more efficient, can generally handle more power, and because of it's efficiency, would prolly turn the fan at more RPM than the ARC. However, the mega costs more money. and i hate to say it, but performance vs price matters, otherwise all of my aircraft would prolly be $5K turbines. The arc's are outstanding value. A cut above anything else in it's price range. only thing that comes close for the price, IMHO, are HET's. and honestly, I would take an arc over an HET anyday of the week. I've run the ARC's on 6S in wemo's and DS-30's and HET's. you are looking at 95-110 amps and 2100-2300 watts, depending on fan, batteries, etc.etc. Both motors are burst use only at this level. I personally, would buy an ARC. There is NOTHING wrong with the 28-58-1 on 6S. I'll gladly give up 2-3% efficiency for 40-50% cost savings ($90 vs $150). I love all my ARC/HET combos. here's my ARC 28-47-1 with HET fan in an HET super sniper. fun little edf:
|
|||
|
||||
|
|
||
|
Joined Jul 2011
109 Posts
|
Quote:
Thanks for the reply Pete! Yea, I'm kinda leaning toward the ARCs myself. I was just hesitant though, because of all the shaft issues ARC has (or so I've been hearing) AWESOME VIDEO BTW!! |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
The shaft issues for the ARC's are with the prop guys. I've grenaded many fans with a 28-58-1 and never had any shaft issues.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Pete... just a pedantic professor taking you (gently) to task.
The mega is more efficient, can generally handle more power, and because of it's efficiency, would prolly turn the fan at more RPM than the ARC. Your explanations are wonderfully lucid, but the use of "prolly" for "probably" simply drives me up the wall. And you are by no means the only one to use this term, which surely cannot be found in the Oxford or even Webster's. Here endeth the lesson. Cheers, Phil |
|
|
|
|
View Post |
| ZACATTACK | |
|
A moderator felt this post violated the following rule: Personal Attack.
Show it to me anyway.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion Arc 28-58-1 | Boogie_ | Electric Ducted Fan Jet Talk | 79 | Dec 24, 2012 11:09 PM |
| Discussion Mega 16/40/1 compared to 16/40/2 | sebbe | High Performance | 9 | Sep 15, 2011 06:23 AM |
| Wanted arc 28-58-1 motor | onefastxp | Aircraft - Electric - Power Systems (FS/W) | 0 | May 25, 2011 12:19 PM |
| Wanted ARC 28-58-1 motor | keithj-pilot | Aircraft - Electric - Power Systems (FS/W) | 1 | Apr 23, 2011 08:11 AM |
| Wanted Mega 16/15/3 or equal, will buy or swap ARC 28-47-1.5 | GyroRon | Aircraft - Electric - Power Systems (FS/W) | 6 | Dec 15, 2008 11:46 PM |