|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Latest blog entry: Vintage Kyosho Buggies, why I love 'em...
|
||
|
|
|
|
Joined Jun 2011
4,866 Posts
|
Good point, Walter. I think it's just really good engineering. In my case, it's helpful because if I go fly with my neighbor and friend, he flies mode 1 and I fly mode 2. And as you mentioned, inability to switch modes could be a deal breaker if you ever decide to sell the heli.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
), no more double stocks, or finding that a heli with your preferred control mode TX has been sold out, but the other mode is still present. Newbies (although they should not start with a sub micro CP) can try which mode works best for them.And when selling it there is also a benefit, as you already mentioned, it will always fit the next buyer's needs, unless he or she wants mode 3 or 4. But all these benefits set aside, I think it's genius to think up a construction that allows this mode switch, it requires some out of the box thinking, as most companies rely on the trusted method of relocating springs inside the TX (fiddly job) or at least need you to unscrew both stick units, and swap them, like on the Align 100. I think it's a brilliant mix of electronics and mechanics. Added benefit, it can help with trouble shooting. Say, if your main motor won't start, but swapping the motor has revealed it's not the motor, it might be the stick or the ESC. Switching modes you can test the sticks on different functions. If suddenly on the other mode the elevator servo is dead, it's the stick, but if the motor still won't turn, despite the switch, it has to be the ESC. Without this easy switching trick, you would need a second, known to be good TX to test what is broken. |
|
|
Latest blog entry: Vintage Kyosho Buggies, why I love 'em...
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
For myself this is absolutely no point, and cause I am a mode 2 flyer, and most people here are, this would also not be a big disadvantage when selling (but do I want to sell it if I buy it?). I would prefer to hear of improvements, "genius" constructions in the heli. I would prefer if all helis of similar size (of different companies) would use same kind of battery plugs. And what I would prefer most: If I even would not need to buy a new tx for every heli of different brand (and to Nine Eagles: IF I WOULD BE ABLE TO USE THE NEW TX WITH ALL MY "OLD" NE HELIS AND PLANES!). I hate this system, every company uses its own 2.4 GHz protocoll. USING COMPATIBLE PROTOCOLS FOR 2.4 GHz SYSTEMS AND BEING COMPATIBLE TO ALL MODELS EVEN OF THE SAME COMPANY (NINE EAGLES - and even the new Walkera helis) - this would be genius in my eyes! Walter |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Latest blog entry: Vintage Kyosho Buggies, why I love 'em...
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Unfortunately, I don't think a unified 2.4G system will ever come to fruition. It's a huge backwards step in my opinion. Back in the good old days, you could use any TX with any RX by simply changing over a crystal. |
|
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Product Nine Eagles Solo Pro 328 (Nine Eagles' answer to the Blade 120 SR?) | SoloProFan | Micro Helis | 1666 | Jun 14, 2013 08:42 AM |
| Discussion Nine Eagles Solo tail motor problem?? | dangerousatom | Micro Helis | 39 | Aug 24, 2011 08:00 PM |
| Discussion What do you all think of the Nine Eagles Solo Pro | gaaunapoi | Beginner Training Area (Heli-Electric) | 10 | Mar 31, 2011 10:56 PM |
| Discussion Falcon 8193 vs Nine EAgles Solo | cvrle1 | Coaxial Helicopters | 3 | Mar 12, 2011 11:32 AM |