|
|
|
|
||
|
Joined Mar 2012
128 Posts
|
Quote:
Yeah like I said i would just attatch the wings first and then see if it tail heavy. But you may not even need to attach a dime. A 250mah battery might just do the trick. Plus you will have longer run times with a perfectly balanced out plane.
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Fun with paintball guns & RC planes
A club I used to be in once had a fun-fly where one of the competitions was paintball target-practice - with a twist. We set up semi-auto paintball guns for the spectators to shoot. The target was a Coroplast 40-size trainer, which was essentially indestructible. We had experimented with a balsa & film trainer, but found that even one paintball could cause some serious damage - so we went with the Coroplast trainer. Each pilot made one pass. We entered the 'hit-box' in level flight, and were then free to use evasive maneuvers. But the plane had to remain in the box, and reversing flight-direction was prohibited. The shooters were allowed to shoot only when the plane was in the box. The hit counters compared notes, tallied-up the hits, and the pilot with the fewest hits was declared the winner. The plane was the prize! We advertised the event well in advance. As you might imagine, we had a great turnout! By the end of the day, the plane had taken so many hits, it looked like a tie-dyed T-shirt! Or the Day-Glo Nash Rambler a buddy of mine drove back in high-school! Was an absolute blast for everyone, and the fun-fly exposed more people to RC that day than any event we ever hosted!
![]() Joel |
|
|
|
|
Joined Mar 2012
8 Posts
|
Just got this plane yesterday, had a rather, hectic maiden today.
The problem is that the throttle cuts out after a few seconds whenever it is flying. At first I thought it was the battery, and changed battery's, but it still persisted. Upon further inspection, the throttle will cut out after about 10 seconds, and the red light will flash repeatedly for about 5 seconds, and then go back to normal. The controls still work during this. I have no idea what is going on, everything else works fine. Any ideas's? Yes these are fully charged batteries fresh off the charger, it has this problem right away. |
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Joel |
|
|
Latest blog entry: Eflite UMX Sbach 3D on 3s - 2300Kv/5043...
|
||
|
|
|
|
Joined Mar 2012
128 Posts
|
Hey did you try to re-bind the aircraft? Also what transmitter are you using?Try this a couple times and try some diffrent batteries. If this doesn't work then you have a faulty ESC. Just call parkzone and see if they can do anything about it. It could just be a bad plane in the batch. They might send you a new ESC for free.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Joined Mar 2012
8 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Joel |
|
|
Latest blog entry: Eflite UMX Sbach 3D on 3s - 2300Kv/5043...
|
||
|
|
||
|
Joined Mar 2012
128 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
||||
|
|
Quote:
Flight-time with the Hyp 240 mAh cell will be ~50% longer than the Hyp 160 mAh cell. BTW - many of the F4Us are tail-heavy. If yours is tail-heavy, a Hyp 240 'M' cell mounted at the front of the battery tray will solve the problem without adding undesirable dead-weight. Here's one of my performance demos with the GWS 5043 prop & a Hyperion 240 mAh cell:
Joel |
|||
|
|
|
|
Joined Mar 2012
128 Posts
|
Wow. That was really good. The plane looked like it had so much more performance. My plane was not tail heavy out of the box so I guess if I was to use a 240mah battery I should just put in the middle of the slot. Are the E-Flite batteies any good or are they just the same as the Hobbyzone ones with just a different label? Thanks for all if your help.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Thanks! She sure is a lot more fun with good batteries & a 5043 prop. She performs like an air-superiority fighter is supposed to perform. The full-scale F4U was a serious hot-rod, as were the other ultra-high-performance fighters of the day - such as the P-47, Spitfire, Mosquito, P-38, P-51, and FW-190. These were not lumbering planes. They were hopped-up, fire-breathing, earth-shaking hot-rods. The Bugattis & Ferraris of the air! Regarding battery placement - there is an old saying - 'a nose-heavy plane may fly poorly, but a tail-heavy plane may fly only once.' I'd start with the Hyp 240 a bit forward & and sneak-up on the sweet-spot by moving the CG slowly aft. If the plane requires up-elevator to fly level when upright, it's still nose-heavy. If the nose drops like a rock in turns or when you cut the power, it's nose-heavy. When the CG is in the right spot, you should be able to trim for level flight @ 80% throttle, roll inverted, and only a small amount of down-elevator should be required for level inverted flight. Also, the nose will only drop slightly when power is cut, and the plane will be able to fly much more slowly. If the CG is too far aft, down-elevator will be required for level upright flight, the plane will tend to climb when rolled inverted, and it will tend to balloon when power is cut on approach. It will be overly pitch-sensitive, and will also be very 'darty' in turbulence. If you don't need the nose-weight, you could use the Hyp 180. If you fly in really tight quarters or indoors, the extra weight of the 240 may be noticeable. The Hyp 180 provides the same power as the Hyp 240 in this app. I haven't tried Eflite's new 150 mAh 25c replacement for their old 150 mAh 12c cell. I have read that they provide more power that Eflite's older 150. But I've also read that cycle-life isn't so great. The HobbyZone & ParkZone UM cells perform even worse than the older Eflite 150. True c-rating is the important thing when it comes to LiPo performance. C-rating is a function of the cell's internal resistance. The lower the internal resistance, the higher the true c-rating. Internal resistance determines how well the battery will maintain voltage under load. W=V^2/R, which means that a small increase in voltage will provide a large increase in power. Unfortunately, many LiPo manufacturers lie about c-ratings. Most of the companies that make the cheap Chinese packs are notorious for grossly exaggerating c-ratings. Companies such as Hyperion & Thunderpower have been long-noted for rating their LiPos honestly. All Hyperion & Thunder Power LiPos can be safely charged at 5c for 300+ cycles without losing performance. That means 12-15 minute charges. The latest Thunder Power 65c packs can be charged at 12c for 600+ cycles without losing performance. That means 7-minute charges, with an appropriate charger! Also, both companies actually provide warranties with their LiPos. If they fade away or fail early, both companies will stand behind their products & make it right. Also, both companies have crash-replacement warranties, where they cover part of the pack replacement cost in a crash. This is a very big plus for those who fly larger electric planes & helis that require large, expensive packs. Joel |
|
|
Latest blog entry: Eflite UMX Sbach 3D on 3s - 2300Kv/5043...
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
(See post http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showp...&postcount=765 page 51.)I just received my two Thunder Power 1s 25c 160mAh in the mail and tried them in my Corsair and Champ. (Champ was having the same issuse) Both planes ran and operated beautifully at WOT. So, the first calm day we get, I'll be taking them out to play. I miss my Champ. (Sorry if this pic is off thread.)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion Blade MCP X - owner's thread | rchelijc | Micro Helis | 12009 | Today 06:18 PM |
| Discussion Parkzone vs.BlitzRCWorks F4U Corsair (which one) | wjohnson1186 | Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) | 21 | Nov 05, 2012 01:55 PM |
| Discussion Parkzone f4u corsair VS Airfield f4u corsair | Hoopsta17_99 | Electric Warbirds | 54 | Mar 16, 2012 08:11 PM |
| Discussion Difference between Parkzone's different Ultra Micro planes? | bunger | Indoor and Micro Models | 21 | Jul 10, 2011 03:32 PM |
| New Product New Ultra Micro F4U Corsair BNF by ParkZone | P-51C | Micro RTF | 3 | Feb 23, 2011 10:27 AM |