|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still flying with the "damaged" Nano I posted above. I have not done anything to the RX at all excpt tape it into the plane.
I love these things! ![]() Pat |
|
Latest blog entry: Nico Hobbies
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Latest blog entry: Transmitt
|
||
|
|
|
|
Joined Dec 2007
229 Posts
|
Well I just finished off my first 150cc gas plane, and I am using 2 nano RX for the receiver in the plane. I soldered 16 gauge wire to the back side of the RX pins for the the positive and negative battery connection, I should have used 18 gauge, but I had 16 gauge on hand. I do not have RX switches, so it takes me a little time to unplug the power after a flight as I have to remove the canopy.
So about the smallest thing in this model are the RXs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lake Havasu, AZ
Joined Jun 2005
14,559 Posts
|
Make sure you range check head on with the plane. The receivers should not be on center line, they should be above the center, typically in the turtle deck or in the canopy area.
On the 50%'er we have here, we mounted one to each side of the pilot's head, in his headphones.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
I am really getting confused here. The above quote suggests that to improve reception (avoiding blanking), two rx are better than one when mounted in separated locations. To my recollection only a satellite setup fullfills this, not two rx in master/slave configuration
|
|
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wanted AR6300 nano RX | flyinjrc74 | Aircraft - General - Radio Equipment (FS/W) | 3 | Apr 02, 2011 04:59 PM |
| Discussion A truly SLICK product (for hunters) | realtimerecon | Life, The Universe, and Politics | 15 | Dec 12, 2010 08:13 PM |
| Discussion Blue Arrow 5ch Nano Rx & Esky 8g Nano Servos | daniirwan | Radios | 6 | May 03, 2007 11:07 AM |
| Just picked up a PHX-Link, Cool Product | DavidJ | Castle Creations | 2 | Apr 29, 2004 03:38 PM |