| RCCars | Crack Roll | Flying Giants | RC Power | The E Zone | Lift Zone | Our Sponsors | |||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
#2 |
|
Regiztered Uzer
|
Thanks Ron
I've always been contemplating a challenge like this. This is a great compilation of designs - too bad I can't read german, but I'll see what the web translators can come up with Marc |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Impossible? Hah!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oslo Fornebu, Norway
Posts: 2,820
|
Mine will be very much like number 4 I think.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Windsor, UK
Posts: 298
|
Thanks Ron - keep up the good work / mark
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 587
|
Continuing on with Brushless designs, I am close to finalizing mine and have progressed to my second PCB version that now incorporates the sensor circuitry. I have managed to get a HD motor running without a problem, but when I attempted my Mega motor, I promptly burned out the high side FETs. There seems to be limited information relating to the method of drive and I do not have a commercial one at my disposal that would answer all my questions.
Now this may sound like a very stupid question to those that know, but what I need to know is … when starting the motor, a PWM signal is applied. But once up and running, then what? Is the PWM discarded and short pulses triggered at the start of each new phase? In other words, fire the “controlled” pulse, which accelerates the motor, and then wait for “crossing” feedback whilst motor decelerates. The controlled pulse width then determines the final speed. Is this the way it is done, or is the PWM signal being used all the time? I am finding that an extended duration PWM signal is the cause of my FETs going bang. They are being driven via a FET driver IC. My controller at present is an overkill as far as the digital stuff goes. Wanted to play with a logic device, so added it in order to make controller more flexible and allow very high speeds. Will post pic as soon as I get a motor running. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 678
|
Too slow detection and starting
Mr DIY,
>wait for “crossing” feedback You must wait the feed back signal for next switch to start and run, for sure. So far, My new program generates "preset duty" drive phase signal applying sequently until next 1/2Vcc cross signal detection, under no information of magnet rotor position. http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...89#post1676789 Also, "Too slow condition" as over load can be detected while running by timer. This condition is also caused at starting.Then,my program has no-output timer as starting duty control when the system does not start. FET works CD-ROM RC motor, because of the coil winding wire is not so thick as low resistance compared to RDS(On):On Resistance between Drain and Source. FET does not heat up at all on my winding. The problem is "preset duty" setting value to protect FETs when the motor coil is wound with very a few turns and with very low registance thick wire. You may sense the starting rush current by RDS(On) on FET or one of current sense hall device on power line by A/D for best solution. Last edited by Takao Shimizu; Sep 12, 2004 at 10:03 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,283
|
Quote:
I use it a lot ![]() -Mike |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
homo ludens modellisticus
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: near Nijmegen, Netherlands
Posts: 8,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,283
|
Thanks Ron, I've bookmarked that one too.
-Mike |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: London Heathrow, Great Britain (UK)
Posts: 314
|
Sensored Design
Hi,
I am looking for a sensored design. I want to use the hall sensors on the CD board I have. Surely this can't be too difficult ?? Anyone have any ideas ? Thanks Tim |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,283
|
Sensorless is simpler than sensor type, parts-wise that is
![]() -Mike edit: Posted after Takao's post to clarify it. Which he deleted and re-posted. Maybe I should delete this as it is confusing. ![]() BTW, controller software is much easier w/ a sensored motor. Last edited by FlyByMike; Jan 08, 2004 at 08:14 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 678
|
Re: Sensored Design
Tim,
Sensored type is useful to get the starting torque for RC car application. Sensore less circuit is simpler than sensored type. Takao |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: London Heathrow, Great Britain (UK)
Posts: 314
|
this is very complex,
I was hoping it would be easy like the circuit for the 2-phase motor in http://www.rcmicroflight.com/library/motor1.asp . Incidently would a 2 phase motor be powerful enough for RC - the controller is certainly simple ! Thanks Tim |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 678
|
Tim,
This is my simplest flying single phase motor. http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...518#post594518 Takao |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
homo ludens modellisticus
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: near Nijmegen, Netherlands
Posts: 8,674
|
Added development discussions:
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...hreadid=168476 http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...hreadid=181247 |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Diy brushless esc | slowflyer90 | DIY Electronics | 66 | Mar 25, 2006 08:56 AM |
| new brushless diy ESC designs | ronvans | EFLIGHT Mailing List | 0 | Aug 30, 2004 09:11 AM |
| Best DIY Brushless ESC Kit? | gfcermak | DIY Electronics | 10 | Aug 25, 2004 02:23 AM |
| five diy brushless ESC designs | ronvans | EFLIGHT Mailing List | 0 | Aug 09, 2003 04:02 AM |
| group order for diy Speedy-BL brushless ESC family | Ron van Sommeren | Electric Plane Talk | 5 | Jul 27, 2003 11:56 AM |