HobbyKing.com New Products Flash Sale
R/C Groups.com   RCCars Crack Roll Flying Giants RC Power The E Zone Lift Zone Our Sponsors
R/C Groups.com


Go Back   RC Groups > Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes > Parkflyers

Reply Post New Thread  Previous Thread Next Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 10, 2001, 09:50 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Bleriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,837
Adding ailerons to GWS Tiger Moth

Hi all. Been awhile since I posted, just wondering if anyone has done this, is planning to, or thinks it's stupid. Which wing would be best suited to this proposed modification? Thanks Best Regards
Bleriot is offline Find More Posts by Bleriot   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2001, 10:21 PM   #2
Most Exalted Windbag
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Newark, DE USA
Posts: 1,632
Re: Adding ailerons to GWS Tiger Moth

Hi Bleriot,

Good to see you. You might do a search. I remember reading in the past that people tried and didn't have good luck. However ya never know how the others did it.

If you leave the struts stock there's not much room for aileron width. I was thinking about making my own struts and having them taper to about 1/2 inch more inboard than they are now. Either that or have the aileron stick out from the TE a bit. Could also have aerodynamic balancers like the Fokker which would also give them more "oomph." Of course take out the dihedral. Wouldn't look as "scale" as before.

I decided to keep mine stock and got an FC Cub. I'm going to put ailerons on that. The wings have about an inch of flat width on the TE. Perfect for ailerons.

RB
Red Baron 47 is offline Find More Posts by Red Baron 47   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2001, 10:58 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Folsom,Ca,USA
Posts: 993
Hi,
Ailerons normally go on the lower wing, if not on both. With a full length strip aileron, it doesn't take too much width, just 1/2" will work.

BUT, IMHO, as a long time scratch builder who is currently asslembling a TM ( so cute I couldn't resist) I am not going to put ailerons on it.

For this type of aircraft, just not worth the trouble and weight. A TM is not going to be very acrobatic no matter what, and the weight gain is unattractive.

If you really have to try it, take out almost all of the dihedral, otherwise total waste of time.

And then, be prepared to fly it every second just keeping the wings level. ( typical no dihedral performance).

Will they work? Yes. Will it be worth the effort? Your call.

If you really want a fast roll, put them in both the upper and lower wings and link them externally at the trailing edges. Servo drives the lower ones.

Have fun! thats what this is all about!

Dave
DaveW is offline Find More Posts by DaveW   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 10, 2001, 11:52 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Ben Lanterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: St. Charles, MO USA
Posts: 539
Dihedral

Through a building error my Tiger Moth has almost zero dihedral just setting on the wheels, no aero load. Some dihedral gets in there when the wings are loaded but not much. It is mostly still flat. However there is enough rolling moment due to the sidesllip caused by the rudder (because it is a biplane) that it handles very groovy anyway. Just a nice feel.

If you put ailerons in, couple the ailerons to the rudder either with a separate servo or a simple mechanical linkage. It will stop any adverse yaw from the ailerons and it keeps the airplane controllable when at real slow speeds and all the ailerons do is create drag.

I am using coupled ailerons/rudder on my low wing F-4 model and the effect is nice.
Ben Lanterman is offline Find More Posts by Ben Lanterman   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2001, 08:02 AM   #5
A Few Sandwiches Shy
 
RMason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,957
Welcome back Bleriot-

Judging from my experience with aileroned Litestick and Canard Stick, the ailerons will be marginal at best. The slow speed at which the Moth flies makes the ailerons pretty useless. The rudder is much more effective.

The Canard stick was origionally elev-ail but the designer went back to elev-rud for control authority. At slow speeds aka. landing, the ailerons didn't do much other than cause drag.

However, on my next Moth I am going to modify it into a Stampe SV4c (rounded wings, different tail) and add 4 ailerons. Mabye that will help.

I donno, give it a try. But definately add flying wires for ridgidity and raise the sides of the cockpit for looks.

Rob

here's some pics http://community.webshots.com/user/robertmason
RMason is offline Find More Posts by RMason   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2001, 12:42 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Bleriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,837
Hi Thanks for the input and the welcome back, I'm 99% sure that this venture into a F...F...FO...FOAM slowflyer will happen though! I have some cf rod and tube and some F... friendly CA and epoxy, rigging wires are to be Spiderwire, I've read thru some of the threads and will use all the good info I can. Sounds like a majority of fliers are enjoying this airframe. Have the apc adapter and 9-7 prop, heat sink etc. Planning on 3 Tadrians and 6 AAA NiMH, gots a few SPARE motors too! Yello tape on the L.E.? How much does the wing flex? Best Regards
Bleriot is offline Find More Posts by Bleriot   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2001, 04:24 PM   #7
A Few Sandwiches Shy
 
RMason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,957
Bleriot-

You don't need to add anything to the basic airframe except the flying wires, and mabye to strengthen the landing gear(tho I haven't had any probs)

The flying wires lock the wing down and the only mod for wing flex is to strengthen the front wing strut. I found this out the hard way. Tight turns gave random aileron input due to the lower wing twisting and bending the strut. Solved this by adding a strip of scrap strut material to the front. With this set up there is NO flex in the wing under + or - G's.

The APC prop works great and won't break like the GWS one. I haven't smoked the motor (yet) and I use 8 cell 280 NiMH packs and get 15-23 min flights at reduced throttle and 10-12 full bore. Using heat sink and motor cooling hasn't been a problem. Though I'm sure the Bleriot curse of fried motors may happen someday.

Another note: use baking soda with the CA to fill gaps when setting wing dihedral and attaching struts,works great.

Rob

PS- weekend carnage report anyone?
RMason is offline Find More Posts by RMason   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2001, 09:09 PM   #8
Lone Night Ranger
 
DaveG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Houston, TX, US
Posts: 1,145
Hi, Bleriot. You're going to love flying the little Moth. It's my first slow flyer and I can't wait to fly it when the wind is calm. I'm flying with a 6 cell 280 mah pack. Just a very nice, relaxing flyer, with no bad characteristics. My favorite is practising touch and goes.

I found using polyurethane glue for the wing struts and in the upper wing gap to hold the dihedral worked great. I didn't like the look of the wrinkled mess I got with the tape in the kit. Very tough, light joints. Also used the poly glue to mount the plastic wing saddle to the lower wing. The lower wing kept sagging with the kit-supplied double sided tape.

I've had good luck with the standard GWS prop but finally busted one when I had a hard nose over on some grass. I just popped on one of several spare props I've got. I've had better luck flying off of asphalt surfaces than I have off of grass.

Enjoy!

Dave G
DaveG is offline Find More Posts by DaveG   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2001, 09:33 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Bleriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,837
Hi Yes as soon as my last check arrives, it's off to the LHS for my very own Tiger Moth! I'm looking forward to this and have sure had a LOT of posts to wade thru looking for info. Ah, the whine of the ips drive!I had the idea that by cutting down a GWS 10-8 (thick blade roots) to 9 or 8 1/2" using a compass and then re-balance, that the 9-7 prop breakage problem could be eliminated w/o going to the APC which is heavier. Might be a solution for some. Out comes the Sharpie of course. Will be rummaging around the toy dept for some wheels, I might go to the LHS and just caress the box a little What's the total wing area? Did anyone try the s-1 or s-2 ips drives yet, they must be a bit quieter and use the 8-9" props? Best Regards
Bleriot is offline Find More Posts by Bleriot   Reply With Quote
Reply Post New Thread  Previous Thread Next Thread

Castle Creations      DRIVE / FLY / SUPPORT  

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GWS Tiger Moth GREAT!!! Majortomski Scale Electric Planes 1 Jul 29, 2001 02:55 AM
Got the GWS Tiger Moth today - I think i'm addicted! mrebman Parkflyers 4 Jul 02, 2001 10:06 PM
NEW - gws Tiger Moth -vs- Bleriot III - Will pico Pack work? mrebman Parkflyers 1 Jul 01, 2001 01:24 AM
GWS Tiger Moth - How slow does it fly? mrebman Parkflyers 2 Jun 29, 2001 01:27 AM
GWS Tiger Moth RMason Scale Electric Planes 0 Jun 26, 2001 06:21 PM




All RCGroups content copyright 1996 - 2009 by RCGroups.com and Jim Bourke except where otherwise indicated.
Terry the transmitter, the RCGroups name and logo, The E Zone, Lift Zone, and RC Power are all trademarks of RCGroups and Jim Bourke. Please report any misuse of our trademarks using the contact form. Thank you.

Bored? Want to fight?
Join the RCGroups clan!

Powered by vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.