|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest blog entry: Get Help by posting your SPM File
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps I will and in my case I have no issues with doing it inside just like I do all my other LiPoly bench testing. Also in my case not really stupid as I am still using a charger with balancing leads connected which will prevent any cell from exceeding 4.205 volts.
Fact is what I am doing now is no diferent than testing I did 6 years ago other than I now have a very easy means to graph the result,do automated cycles and of course observe the difference in the way newer cells respond to such testing. Being able to charge at higher C rates also enable me to complete X number of cycles much faster. Charles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States, TX, Grand Prairie
Joined Nov 2005
4,988 Posts
|
"...No I did not get confused . Charge after Dsc#4 resulted in cells perfectly balanced without any balancing and at the same voltages as a balanced charge..."
Could this be due to the low IR of the cells? Shoot, I've been thinking about to balance or not to balance for a while and concluded I can balance at night and don't have to balance any longer during fly days and most of my bats are 20c... |
|
|
|
|
|
Well as I have been posting for around six years now,some Lipolys need balancing when new,some need balancing every few cycles,some every ten cycles ,some every twenty and some never need it.
In have had LiPolys which really needed balancing every charge and some that went over 200 charges without balancing and were still within 0.05 volts at full charge even after their capacity had drop by approx. 20%. It is easy enough to check if you have a charger that will do a non balamced charge. It is best to use one that lets you use the balancing leadsa and will terminate the charge when any cell exceeds 4.2 volts and also lets you read the cell voltages at least after the charge if not during the charge.. Charles |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
One other point is that you never discharge a lipo anywhere near 3.3V resting voltage under normal circumstances, so why do it now? If this test is to be useful in real life the packs should be discharged to approx a 3.7V resting voltage and by looking at the graphs, we would see that they will still be very closely balanced. |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
So. Cal.
Joined Oct 2004
6,179 Posts
|
Quote:
The fact that many if not most of the manufacturers of budget packs employ no cell matching when assembling packs makes owning a quality balancing charger or inline balancer even more important. Balancing chargers and inline balancers that have the ability to monitor all cells within a pack and terminate charge if an unsafe voltage is reached have been the single greatest contributor in the dramatic reduction in overcharge related lipoly fires. The fact that they are also extremely inexpensive make it completely foolish to not own and use them, especially if one charges indoors. Mark |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Non balanced charges Turnigy nanao tech 45C
Graph shows non balanced charges 5-9 (10 if you count the from storage one). As can be seen the cells have not became more inbalanced with each cycle as many state they will. I used this pack for these test mostly due to the simple fact that it is not what I consider an extremly well match pack to begin with.
Charles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
So. Cal.
Joined Oct 2004
6,179 Posts
|
Excellent graph Charles.
Clearly indicates that if this particular pack (which is poorly matched with respect to capacity) were balanced while discharged, the witnessed imbalance would 'shift' to the charged state and possibly to a unsafe level. This condition would be far worse if the pack were a higher cell count and had several 'higher capacity' cells and one 'lower capacity' cell. Balancing while discharged would drag the higher capacity cells to the same voltage as the lower capacity cell. When subsequently charged, the lower capacity cell very well may be overcharged to the point of ignition. Ignition is bad. ![]() Mark |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
There are more that do not follow the 80% rule than those who do. Most Lipoly users never visit a user's forum . Most still fly to LVC and most LVCs are still more appropuate for 6C Lipolys than 20C plus ones. There are many here on RC Groups who have been members for years who sstill expect a 2200 mAh LiPoly to deliver 2200 mAh even after it has been flown 50 times and stored fully charged since new and it is now two years old. Most of the small percentage who know and practice good Lipoly management rarely ever post as they do not care for the constat debating that goes on. There are some experts who still claim that discharging a LiPoly 100% at 1C or even 0.5C down to 3.0 volts per cell does no harm to them. Charles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
cells balanced at 3.343 and then non balanced charge
Note : I captured the first screen shot early in charge beforee the inbalance point became to compressed.
Bet these results are not nearly as bad as some imagined. Charles
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion A123: balancing "to be or not to be" | armengol | Batteries and Chargers | 55 | Dec 10, 2006 12:26 PM |
| Discussion LiPoly Balancing Science or Art. | everydayflyer | Batteries and Chargers | 32 | Apr 26, 2006 08:38 AM |
| to attempt adding balancing connectors or not? | Willard | Batteries and Chargers | 5 | Oct 11, 2005 11:46 AM |
| Unicorn on Mega 16/15/4 = Lipoly or not? | jimklein | Flying Wings | 22 | Nov 19, 2004 09:03 PM |
| What not to do with a Maha charger or How I blew up a LiPoly | Inari | Parkflyers | 22 | Jan 01, 2004 06:27 PM |