|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree that the electronics are crap. I burnt up my motor. Then ordered a new one, but after hooking it up the ESC smoked when I just checked the turning direction of the motor. Absolutely worthless. I can't believe I paid this much for a piece of packing styrofoam. It is dishonest business as scott page said. Especially when the dealer, HobbyKing will not acknowledge THEY shipped a faulty product and can't step up to the plate and admit it, even with so many of us with failures. Poor business practice and cowardly if you ask me. This plane has more than doubled in value with the replacement parts and shipping I have purchased. I have shelved this plane. Too close to the end of the season to get sucked into a money pit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Aug 2008
48 Posts
|
my bad...
See motor : I am thinking either this http://www.hobbycity.com/hobbycity/s...idProduct=5204 OR http://www.hobbycity.com/hobbycity/s...idProduct=2139 |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|||
|
|
||
|
|
MotoCalc 12x6 on my setup
Quote:
I'm also going to cut the prop shaft down with a dremel and then use the prop shaft adapter it came with to run it. I estimate that I might have it RTF by this Saturday depending on how much free time I can muster to work on it this week. I did get the following results with MotoCalc that a friend helped me out with to figure out that a 12x6 prop should be perfect for my setup. 12x6 on Flightmax 5S 3000 mAh numbers. MotOpinion - Yak54 1.5m Monster 3D Brushless 315ft above Sea Level, 29.92inHg, 58°F Motor: Turnigy 50-55B 600kv Outrunner; 650rpm/V; 3A no-load; 0.0205 Ohms. Battery: Flightmax (20C); 5 cells; 3000mAh @ 3.7V; 0.008 Ohms/cell. Speed Control: Turnigy Brushless ESC 85A; 0.006 Ohms; High rate. Drive System: 12x6 Electric Prop; 12x6 (Pconst=1.31; Tconst=0.95) direct drive. Airframe: Yak 54 1.5m Monster 3D Brushless; 680sq.in; 81.3oz RTF; 17.2oz/sq.ft; Cd=0.038; Cl=0.2; Clopt=0.43; Clmax=1.07. Stats: 141 W/lb in; 122 W/lb out; 21mph stall; 33mph opt @ 74% (23:31, 116°F); 48mph level; 1642ft/min @ 34.8°; -369ft/min @ -7.4°. Warning: MotoCalc was unable to determine a throttle setting for hands-off cruise airspeed, so the best lift-to-drag ratio airspeed and throttle setting will be used instead. Inability to determine a throttle setting for an airspeed usually means the model is not capable of reaching the required speed with the given power system, or the airfoil information has not been specified correctly. Possible Power System Problems: The full-throttle motor current at the best lift-to-drag ratio airspeed (33.4A) is lower than the motor's maximum efficiency current (49.8A). A higher current level would improve system efficiency. Current can be increased by using more cells, a larger diameter or higher pitched propeller, a lower gear ratio, or some combination of these methods. Power System Notes: The voltage (16.5V) exceeds 12V. Be sure the speed control is rated for at least the number of cells specified above. Aerodynamic Notes: The static pitch speed (57mph) is within the range of approximately 2.5 to 3 times the model's stall speed (21mph), which is considered ideal for good performance. With a wing loading of 17.2oz/sq.ft, a model of this size will have trainer-like flying characteristics. It would make an ideal trainer, for use in calm to light wind conditions. The static thrust (99.4oz) to weight (81.3oz) ratio is 1.22:1, which will result in extremely short take-off runs, no difficulty taking off from grass surfaces (assuming sufficiently large wheels), and vertical climb-outs. This model will probably be able to perform a hover or torque roll. At the best lift-to-drag ratio airspeed, the excess-thrust (46.7oz) to weight (81.3oz) ratio is 0.57:1, which will give steep climbs and excellent acceleration. This model should be able to do consecutive loops, and has sufficient in-flight thrust for almost any aerobatic maneuver. General Notes: This analysis is based on calculations that take motor heating effects into account. These calculations are based on mathematical models that may not account for all limitations of the components used. Always consult the power system component manufacturers to ensure that no limits (current, rpm, etc.) are being exceeded. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Joined Feb 2009
19 Posts
|
Has anyone tried on 6S yet. I just bought one and am going to run it on 6S with this motor.
http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...idProduct=7069 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Hobby King was at fault when they shipped these defective Yak motors and ESC's -- why should they profit AGAIN??!!? I'm DARN sure not going to buy my replacement parts from Hobby King. That is why they sell us garbage in the first place, because they know we'll spend more to get it into the air. Even if I have to spend more than the Yak54 cost in the first place, I'm going to put a quality motor and ESC from any other dealer other than Hobby King. Wow. Break the cycle. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Joined Feb 2009
19 Posts
|
Would need some work the stock motor dims:
Physical Specs are: Weight (g) 147.4 Max Current (A) 60 Shaft A (mm) 5 Length B (mm) 45 Diameter C (mm) 37 Can Length D (mm) 35 Total Length E (mm) 65 So will need to maybe do some work to the cowl. I changed the motor to handle the 6S Scott. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion HobbyKing Yak 54, Extreme 3d machine! | Bowerz | 3D Foamies | 50 | Jul 06, 2011 05:32 AM |
| Wanted RC-Factory Yak 54 or Yak 55 | Hammer | Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) | 3 | Jul 09, 2010 11:12 PM |
| Discussion Yak Yak Yak (54) | Chophop | Electric Plane Talk | 10 | May 09, 2010 09:53 AM |
| Discussion Ultrafly Yak 54 vs QQ Yak 54 49" | netdudeuk | 3D Flying | 5 | Aug 04, 2007 04:02 PM |
| Quique's E-Yak-54 and his foamy Yak-54 | flierbk | 3D Flying | 0 | Aug 25, 2005 09:55 AM |