|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I may be wrong, but I don't think there are any digitals in that price range, yet.
I do my aerials (not with a Twinstar, but it would work) with a Vivitar 35mm camera I bought some years ago for about $30. I also have a Cannon Elph Jr. APS camera that will someday get flown.....but setting that up keeps getting pushed down the priority list. |
|
Latest blog entry: Diverted from R/C to Free Flight (of a...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I use a Canon Elph, Jr. I agree with Mike that the camera Dr. E proposes will not give you satisfactory results -- the resolution on the inexpensive digitals is just not good enough yet for aerial work. I got my Canon at Ritz camera, and also got the deal referred to by Dr. E -- for I think an extra $15, you get a one year extended warranty that covers any damage to the camera "for authorized or unauthorized use." I've already had to use this once, and got a brand new camera no questions asked. (Since I know you guys will ask, the answer to the question is "elevator servo failure"
)Steve DiStasio has had the guts to mount a nice, expensive high resolution digital camera on his Twinstar, and has gotten great photos with it. As always, please post any resulting photos on Steve's site at http://www.squid-ink.com/hpn/rc-photos/index.htm Neil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See pictures at bottom of this page.. http://www.angelfire.com/electronic/flyer/crazeecamera/
..a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I use the Canon Elph-LT. About as light as a camera can get. Film out-resolves any digital camera. Scanning an enlargement brings out details lost in a 640x480 basic image.
Lots of aerial photo stuff on my Sparky site: . Sparky Paul http://www.angelfire.com/indie/aerostuff PJB's Seriously Aeronautical Stuff http://www.networkone.net/~pjburke/index.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Neil indicated earlier, I finally broke down and started using a new digital camera on my Twinstar. It's a Canon S10 (1600x1280). It's pretty heavy, but the Twinstar handles it well enough...just a little tricky on launch. I do get nervous about losing it, but like they say...'nothing ventured, nothing gained'.
There are 3 great advantages to going digital, (1) instant gratification, (2) no more developing costs, (3) take 100's of pics per flight. It's true that the images don't come close to the quality of 35mm, but I just do this for laughs, so super high quality isn't my goal. I've just posted about 9 photos taken with this setup to my site at http://www.squid-ink.com/hpn/rc-photos/index.htm Here's a link to a photo that will give you an idea of the image quality. I knocked the resolution down to 1024x768... http://www.squid-ink.com/hpn/rc-phot...cc_2_large.jpg |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion Best CAmera for aerial photography | eagleeye19 | Aerial Photography | 15 | Feb 25, 2006 08:02 PM |
| What's the best digital for Aerial Photography? | QuietRiot | Aerial Photography | 3 | Dec 28, 2003 09:20 AM |
| What's the best camera for aerial photos? | rucanunes | Aerial Photography | 15 | Jul 07, 2003 12:53 PM |
| Which 35mm compact camera for aerial photography? | Peter Young | Electric Plane Talk | 6 | May 30, 2002 03:04 AM |
| Best plane for aerial photography | dgtaylor | Electric Plane Talk | 18 | Oct 01, 2001 02:21 AM |