...

It looks like typical Chicago thugocratic, sleazy politics by the PBO&Co. administration to me. One of these days, the lizzard like life form inside Rhambo's body will claw itself out through it's human flesh outer layer and the truth will be known I'm sure he was able to say what he did with a straight face and absolutely no emotion.

Originally Posted by Gerald

So what are you trying to tell us with these references? What is the "stand" that you claim to be making?

It looks to me like both GS and the White house are using internet technology to pursue their opposing interests: the White House to promote their position of Wall St. reforms, and GS to attempt to deflect the bad PR. Is that to be unexpected?
And why make these cryptic references then lock the thread?

Chem-trail induced melt-down? This is the second thread started and locked down by the OP. Both seem somewhat Ralfesque to me. If folks aren't using the Internet to pursue their interests they are not doing their job as effectively as they could.

Originally Posted by Sprydle

Chem-trail induced melt-down? This is the second thread started and locked down by the OP. Both seem somewhat Ralfesque to me. If folks aren't using the Internet to pursue their interests they are not doing their job as effectively as they could.

Yes indeed. Anything Rush might bring up is chemically induced. I think they need to ship a bag of the same stuff to the whitehouse. I beleive the street name is "reality".

Originally Posted by FL Knifemaker

Yes indeed. Anything Rush might bring up is chemically induced. I think they need to ship a bag of the same stuff to the whitehouse. I beleive the street name is "reality".

I wasn't referring to Rush.

But since you bring him up, calling the stuff he dishes out "reality" is pushing it - you get (reality)/2 from Rush - if you believe this 1/2 100% you will always go off half-cocked.

[QUOTE=Sprydle;14907071]I wasn't referring to Rush.

Really?? I thought that was THE lib talking point regarding El Rushbo. Did I miss a memo??

Calling the stuff he dishes out "reality" is pushing it - you get (reality)/2 from Rush - if you believe this 1/2 100% you will always go off half-cocked.

You stick with your sources and I'll stick with mine, thank you.

Originally Posted by FL Knifemaker

Really?? I thought that was THE lib talking point regarding El Rushbo. Did I miss a memo??

I'm sure you think a lot of things that are wrong or misinformed.

Originally Posted by flk

You stick with your sources and I'll stick with mine, thank you.

Perhaps this is why.

[QUOTE=Sprydle;14907071]

Originally Posted by Sprydle

I'm sure you think a lot of things that are wrong or misinformed.

OK, that makes sense

Not another Rush Dumbo thread. My God, the mans got the intelligence of a box of rocks.
Do yourself a favor. When it comes to ole Rush, don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see. Lettermans monolog is more believable.

[QUOTE=FL Knifemaker;14907136]

Originally Posted by Sprydle

OK, that makes sense

Welcome back, as you can see, little has changed.

[QUOTE=Moe M.;14907170]

Originally Posted by FL Knifemaker

Welcome back, as you can see, little has changed.

Thanks Moe. You're right, little seems to have changed. All we need now is for Harris to post a Rush Cartoon and everything will all be right.

[QUOTE=FL Knifemaker;14907182]

Originally Posted by Moe M.

Thanks Moe. You're right, little seems to have changed. All we need now is for Harris to post a Rush Cartoon and everything will all be right.

Nothing has changed apparently - my post wasn't about Rush, nor did it mention him, but you *assumed* that it did and went off half-cocked.

You then fire off a bunch of short burst, emoticon laden posts embellishing on that false assumption. Read more slowly and without pre-conceived notion is all that I can suggest.


If nothing has changed, can we expect you to lose it and be banned again soon?

Originally Posted by Sprydle

If nothing has changed, can we expect you to lose it and be banned again soon?

You never know. You can only pray and hit that report button as often as possible

[QUOTE=Sprydle;14907221]

Originally Posted by FL Knifemaker

Nothing has changed apparently - my post wasn't about Rush, nor did it mention him, but you *assumed* that it did and went off half-cocked.

You then fire off a bunch of short burst, emoticon laden posts embellishing on that false assumption. Read more slowly and without pre-conceived notion is all that I can suggest.


If nothing has changed, can we expect you to lose it and be banned again soon?

Surely Sprydie, you can't be talking to me, I haven't paid any attention to what you or Harris has to say for a long time, it's a complete waste of time.

[QUOTE=FL Knifemaker;14907182]

Originally Posted by Moe M.

Thanks Moe. You're right, little seems to have changed. All we need now is for Harris to post a Rush Cartoon and everything will all be right.

What this discussion really needs is an irrelevant graph or two...