|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
I'm thinking the issue is signal polarity. My modules put out a healthy TTL signal. If not then a pull-up resistor would be an even easier fix. You might want to read the prev response carefully. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Another issue might be connecting two outputs together. Do you clearly see pulses on one and none on the other before connecting? Or you might have a damaged unit or wiring error. One way to test outputs is load it down with a 2k resistor and see if that swamps the signal. The same trick can be used to check inputs too. |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
Joined Dec 2007
601 Posts
|
Quote:
Ok, so I would then suggest you disregard to 9C for now and load up the output of your receiver and see how that is affected by load. I'd guess it should be able to handle a 4k7 load without problem......possibly even lower. If you find that a 100k load or bigger is giving you the huge voltage drop then there's a problem with the receiver. You could also switching off the 9C and with NOTHING connected to the PPM port measure the resistance between pins 2 & 6. What this will do is record the input impedance of the 9C......maybe it's near dead short! I measured my FF9 and it's 18.6k. Ian. |
|
|
|
||
|
Joined Apr 2005
776 Posts
|
Quote:
Yes, i am using pins 2 & 6. I measured input impedance between these two pins and it was at 19.87k. This was with a length of wire attached to the pins so that probably explains the small descrepancy. Did i mention that in the datasheet of this receiver it mentions that for logic HIGH and logic LOW ILoad = only 10 uA (micro amps) ? Im too new to this to know exactly how to calculate that into the equation but im pretty sure that this is way too low for 18.6k input impedance? Or am i talkin' crazy ? BTW: here is a link to the datasheet - http://www.sparkfun.com/datasheets/W.../MO-RX3400.pdf |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
Joined Dec 2007
601 Posts
|
Quote:
Tada!................ You 9C load is just over 250uA............much more than your receiver can handle. You need to buffer the signal......and to do that you'll need a bit of electronics knowledge. Many different ways from a couple of transistors (fets have lowest gate current) and a few resistors, to a simple 74HC04 (2 gates in series). Ian. |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Apr 2005
776 Posts
|
@rich, of course i will report back the results
@Ian: i googled it but couldnt really figure out the difference between the LS and HC other than a wiki article about the 7400 series of IC chips that says that KS is low speed and HC is high speed? Can you explain to me the difference between the two as you understand it? |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
Joined Dec 2007
601 Posts
|
Quote:
I think your cutoff is 10uA........however, if you have an LS04 lying around then try it......different manufacturers will give different results. You might be lucky. There are many ways to buffer your signal........but if you ain't too hot at electronics then the above is your way forward.....just 1 component, give it +5vdc power and off you go. Ian. |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Joined Apr 2005
776 Posts
|
Quote:
Thanks!
|
|
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion Help with DX7 tx and AR500 rx | Rydogg420 | Radios | 5 | Mar 19, 2010 02:48 PM |
| Question might a bandpass filter help with 2.4 V-Tx locking out FASST Rx? | lichy | Video Piloting (FPV/RPV) | 9 | Oct 24, 2009 08:02 AM |
| Discussion Futaba 14MZ modules with serial data instead of PPM? | village_idiot | Xtreme Power Systems | 2 | Jan 10, 2008 10:36 AM |
| Discussion New serial checksum RX protocol instead off old PPM? | LoopForEver | DIY Electronics | 13 | Jun 11, 2007 11:51 AM |
| Need help with TX serial cable to Belkin serial to USB converter. | ggood | Simulators | 4 | Sep 23, 2006 09:58 PM |