|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have this test.
2810. Kv. 4300. 8T., 37pulgadas de longitud. KV. medido 4361. 59g. Kv posibles. 7t = 4984. 9t = 3876. 10t = 3488. 11t = 3171. 12t = 2907. 13t = 2683. Rebobinado a 8T. 21AWG, 34” alambre 45,600 rpm, 10.66V, 1.56A, Kv=4277 Con EDF 64mm. (Starmax) 36,250 rpm, 10.30V, 29.90A., 308 Watts. Kv Ratio. 82.2% 40,700 rpm, 11.43V, 38.23A., 437 Watts. Kv Ratio. 83% estas dos pruebas se hicieron con 2 baterias diferentes, totalmente cargadas. Thread in spanish. http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1185976 Manuel V. |
|
|
||
|
|
Most 64mm fans have a motor tube diameter of 24mm or less. Unfortunately this eliminates the majority of better inrunners (eg. ARC, Neu) and helicopter outrunners (eg. Scorpion). Many smaller motors are available, but few can handle 500W.
I tested a Turnigy EDF 2615-3400 in a GWS EDF64 on 4S. It drew 497 Watts (14.5V, 34.3A) producing 43033rpm ('Kv ratio' 80%) and 817g static thrust when installed in a GWS ME-262 nacelle. This is pushing the motor pretty hard, with an estimated 123W loss at 75% efficiency. Note that the actual Kv of this motor is 3700rpm/V. Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks all , you right about the prop , i had a phase 3 f 16 , used a hoffman mighty mite edf motor as a pusher prop , 4.1x4.1 apc , on 3 cells last weekend radared it at 120 , then i lost sight of it and "landed" at 120 , totaled of course , all electronics ok , i have a f86 , still stock , was thinking of doing a upgrade on the motor , i have the hoffmans , but was wondering if anything is more efficient , i hate the short flight times of the edf's , im guessing as the good Dr said , no such thing as a efficient edf ...
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
I've got lots of dons motors, they pretty much dominate the 50mm-64mm range. Of course, I did just get a wm300 60mm, which can take 28mm motors I haven't run mine up yet, but using a arc/neu/mega, I could see +1kw with this fan.
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
GWS EP4025 (4"x2.5"); 118W, 367g, 70mph, 3.11g/W, 0.59mph/W GWS EDF64 (2.5"x4"x6); 128W, 387g, 91mph, 3.02g/W, 0.71mph/W Despite its much larger diameter, the prop produced only slightly higher 'thrust efficiency', while its 'speed efficiency' was significantly worse. Had I compared the EDF to a 2.5" prop, the difference would have been even more dramatic (estimating a mere 257g and 76mph for an EP2510 at 128W) but I can't do that test because I don't have a motor that can do 81000rpm! An EDF should be more efficient because blade tip losses are reduced, and the stator vanes straighten out the airflow. However these gains may be offset by the duct's extra weight and parasitic drag. |
|
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question Are there any tricks to fixing a broken brushless lead | sv650touring | Electric Motor Design and Construction | 23 | Aug 04, 2010 04:29 PM |
| Question Are There Any Flying Clubs In Brisbane??? | SJackson | Club Talk | 0 | Mar 09, 2010 01:54 AM |
| Discussion Are brushless motors more efficient ? | Terry Rigden | Indoor and Micro Models | 9 | Jan 18, 2010 04:32 PM |
| Help! Are there ANY mid-sized bush planes out there??? | perfectlanding | Scale Electric Planes | 4 | Dec 06, 2009 01:21 PM |
| Are there any WINGO fan pages out there? | exempt | Foamies (Kits) | 3 | Jul 16, 2001 06:17 PM |