|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We're going to talk money here. Certainly things such as lighter batteries and one less servo are going to save you weight, but let's forget that for now and just talk about the bottom line.
Something I didn't go into during the report is just how much less expensive of a plane the SC is, as compared to the SHP. Before I got my first 55" SHP, I had to wait. For one thing, big lipos were much more expensive then, but also I would need to buy a 5S battery charger. About a year and a half ago, a 55" plane wasn't a cheap investment.....but that's changed. Admittedly the price of the kit is up over the SHP, but it's the same amount as the SC's carbon landing gear that most of us would have bought anyway. It's just standard now. With this in mind, the price of the arf really hasn't changed, and wing bags are free. The price staying the same is almost the same thing as a reduction, especially if you compare that to everyone else jacking their prices through the roof. There are a couple of areas where you save money that you can see. Of course right off the bat you save $25 because the elevator now only requires a single servo instead of dual, but let's keep digging. Depending on which brand you fly, by dropping from 5 cell batteries to 4s you're going to save from $25 to $40. If you're like most guys, you'll have two batteries, so now you're saving around $50 to $80 on batteries alone. If you like to fly all day and use 4 batteries, you've saved $100 to $160 just by getting rid of that extra cell that you didn't need anyway. The biggest single savings you're going to see with this plane is the battery charger. Most of us upsized into the 55" SHP, Edge or SR from planes like the 47" SHP, Edge, Velox, etc. We were already flying 4s batteries, or at least had a 4s capable charger. What's nice here is that I didn't need to buy a new charger. I can keep using what I've already got. Now that saved me a cool $150. So, in the beginning, compared to a 47" plane, you will spend $100 more on the 57" SC ARF, but, as compared to a 5S powered plane, you'll save that money in startup costs for batteries and a charger. I'm not sure if this is what 3DHS was after when they went to 4s operation on the SC, but I think a lot of guys who are sitting on the fence thinking a big 55-57" plane is too expensive for them might want to give the SC a harder look. |
|
Latest blog entry: Extreme Aviation Has A New Home
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Which motor were you using? Good to hear no servo issues with 5v.
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Nice report Doc! I completely agree about the lightly tinted canopy. I hope this makes its way into the future 3DHS releases as well. I'd definitely be willing to pay a little extra for each plane to already have this extra touch taken care of!
I'm going to try my first tinting job on the canopy on my 70" Slick and I'm really hoping it turns out okay. I picked up some Pactra window tint to use. Also, I have a spare cracked 55" Edge canopy to practice on first, so maybe that will help. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Latest blog entry: Extreme Aviation Has A New Home
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Product 3D Hobby Shop 47" Edge 540 #BUILD VIDEOS ADDED# | ipsmotors | 3D Flying | 3959 | Dec 05, 2012 09:57 PM |
| Video 3D Hobby Shop 57" Sukhoi | sukhoi26mx | Electric Plane Talk | 7 | Sep 17, 2008 08:33 AM |
| Sold NIB 3D Hobby Shop SHP Extra 300 *Blue* Version 2 | thomer | Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) | 7 | May 04, 2008 01:31 PM |
| Build Log 3D Hobby Shop 55" Katana LIVE Build Log | Jeremy Sebens | 3D Flying | 54 | Oct 12, 2007 03:39 PM |