|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
http://www.cheshirefishing.co.uk/sho...les.htm#impact |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Made a nice job of it but why is the elevator servo outside plus a cutout in the elevator to miss the fin. BTW before anyone asks I have not drawn up the plan for the small aileron/flap wing as the take up on it was small and my time is being spent on other things for myself such as writing my memoirs of 60 + years in modelling.
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
This was PM'ed to me, just thought it might be of interest, perhaps he can come back and tell us more no doubt.
Must admit that I would never have tried that ![]() About a month ago I saw your Watts Up at our local flying field and thought it was a very purposeful looking glider! Bought the plans from Traplet, built the fuselage and tail as per plans but.....fitted it with a spare pair of foam wings from a Graupner Electro Junior S I happened to have. These give a ~2m span. Flew this hybrid for the first time at the weekend....our local chief flying instructor did the maiden and trimmed the plane out. Result - "One of the best soaring gliders I have flown for a long time!" We had two 15 minute flights..could have stay up much longer. Flies beautifully! In fact it seems to me it goes better than the original, fully Graupner, glider!! Just goes to show how important all parts of a glider are, not just the wings. Thanks for a great fuselage! Sean. . |
|
|
|
|
Joined Mar 2010
18 Posts
|
Hi All,
It has been a while, but my 2 metre, V-tail version of Watts Up is now ready for her maiden flight. I scaled the wing down to 80% size, but kept the tailplane the same size as the original and converted it into a V-tail. I wanted to use the same motor as the original, so I scaled the length of the fuselage down to 80%, but kept the width and height of the pod to original dimensions. Here are some photos. [ATTACH] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It may be of interest that the "Watts Up" was going to be a V tail after my other creations that I flew before. The arrangement had the V tail mounted on the bottom of the boom, held on by to M3 bolts into a ply vertical insert in the boom. Two snakes were used to operate the ruddervators. It did not happen as most of the people I canvased said a X tail is better, so that is what you got.
Pictures of the Frenesi & Frenes-E in the early 2000's The lightweight wing for the glider version is shown on its own and the Frenes-E has the broad chord wing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Mar 2010
18 Posts
|
Hi Brian,
I had never built a V-tail before, but my understanding was that you save some weight by not having a fin and rudder. Surely that is an advantage. I pondered over a number of methods of attachment and decided to keep the model in the vein of the original by using a tail support, but of lower height. I personally prefer V-tails on top of the boom, as I think they look neater. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Yup, the top mounting looks better but the lower mounting using the V to locate the tailplane, is more practical & saves work ![]() Most comp flyers seem to prefer X tails but I like V tails. There only disadvantage in my eyes is there lack of steerage when in landing configuration with only rudder for steering. Works best with full crow breaking. |
|
|
||