Apr 18, 2003, 08:47 PM
|
|
|
Walled Lake, MI, USA
Joined Feb 2000
11,182 Posts
|
>> Of course the Iraqis were anti-war...they were (are) the ones doing the vast majority of the dying and suffering.
NewbieX, I think that much of your message made a lot of sense. The one point that I disagree with is that you have made an assumption that oppressed peoples are anti-war even when that appears to be their only means of liberation. I don't think that history is on your side with that assumption. In fact many Iraqis gave up their lives fighting for liberty in 1991 when they thought that they had outside help. That proved not to be true, and the Iraqi people had a certain level of distrust this time around as to whether this was going to be a true liberation or not. I don't think we should rely on the information that conservative or liberal reporters are feeding to us right now. I'd like to see the results of a neutral, objective polling of the Iraqi people in a year or two to see if they believe that the military action that led to their freedom from Saddam's regime was worthwhile or not. I don't think the result would be 100% in either direction. However, I believe that a clear majority of Iraqi citizens would say that it was worth a few weeks of military conflict to remove the brutal dictatorship that had taken more of their families' lives over the years than were lost in this brief military action.
|
|
|
|
|