SMALL - Telemetry SMALL - Radio
Thread Tools
Old Mar 30, 2011, 08:46 PM
emillard is offline
Find More Posts by emillard
Registered User
USA, KY, Lexington
Joined Dec 2007
640 Posts
That's a nice job trimming that cowl for that engine. I always thought that would be a PITA. Yours looks great.
emillard is offline Find More Posts by emillard
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Mar 30, 2011, 08:58 PM
Chappy110 is offline
Find More Posts by Chappy110
Registered User
Chappy110's Avatar
WV-northern panhandle
Joined Oct 2008
96 Posts
Thanks, but I ain't goin'a lie...IT WAS! Looks like I still need to get the rest of that GP decal off though. Funny how you don't notice things like that until you look from a different prospective. lol
Chappy110 is offline Find More Posts by Chappy110
Last edited by Chappy110; Mar 30, 2011 at 08:58 PM. Reason: sp
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2011, 06:32 AM
landeck is offline
Find More Posts by landeck
Registered User
United States, GA, Sandy Springs
Joined Jul 2008
573 Posts
What engine and pitts muffler are you using?

Bruce
landeck is offline Find More Posts by landeck
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2011, 11:37 AM
Chappy110 is offline
Find More Posts by Chappy110
Registered User
Chappy110's Avatar
WV-northern panhandle
Joined Oct 2008
96 Posts
Landeck; That's an OS 40 FSR and a Slimline Pitt's style muffler. I'm not much into areobatics, more of a Sport/Scale type flyer but the 40 does well for my tastes.
Chappy110 is offline Find More Posts by Chappy110
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2011, 01:13 PM
DreamArcher is offline
Find More Posts by DreamArcher
DreamArcher's Avatar
Joined Apr 2008
1,980 Posts
Looks great. That is inspirational for me. I was thinking of doing the same with mine but mount the engine inverted. Plus switch back to smaller wheels and get the wheel pants back on. Although the Escapade is my primary plane I fly 99% of the time so I don't really want to screw with it. Still thinking of getting the Reactor so maybe after that.
DreamArcher is offline Find More Posts by DreamArcher
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2011, 04:14 PM
ehskds is offline
Find More Posts by ehskds
Now you see it...
ehskds's Avatar
United States, KY, Henderson
Joined Feb 2006
515 Posts
You know Chappy, if you put some wheel pants on that you would have a mild version of the revolver. I like it, looks great.
ehskds is offline Find More Posts by ehskds
Reply With Quote
Old Mar 31, 2011, 06:06 PM
Chappy110 is offline
Find More Posts by Chappy110
Registered User
Chappy110's Avatar
WV-northern panhandle
Joined Oct 2008
96 Posts
Got the wheel pants, just never put them on as yet. Something else I might get around to this weekend.

DArcher, I think mounting the engine inverted would be even easier than 90 degrees like mine. I considered it but didn't want any added headaches inverted operation might produce.
Thanks guys.
Chappy110 is offline Find More Posts by Chappy110
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 06, 2011, 05:15 PM
DreamArcher is offline
Find More Posts by DreamArcher
DreamArcher's Avatar
Joined Apr 2008
1,980 Posts
One downside of glow is the CG changes in flight or if you don't use a lot of fuel the CG is permanently forward. In 80ish flights I've never even came close to using half a tank. I'm considering reducing the tank to 8oz. I have a new one on my bench I've never used.

You might say just count the turns on the pump and only put in 8oz. I just don't feel comfortable starting without a full tank. Just never sure how much fuel I have unless I see it come out the vent.
DreamArcher is offline Find More Posts by DreamArcher
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 06, 2011, 05:20 PM
Turner2 is offline
Find More Posts by Turner2
Registered User
Tallahassee, FL
Joined Sep 2009
1,800 Posts
This begs the question, why aren't glow planes designed with the fuel tank at the CG. Seems like a major design failing to me but it seems to be common over many different brands.
Turner2 is offline Find More Posts by Turner2
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 06, 2011, 05:37 PM
DreamArcher is offline
Find More Posts by DreamArcher
DreamArcher's Avatar
Joined Apr 2008
1,980 Posts
Most engines don't have fuel pumps/regulators so the engines won't pull fuel that far. The weight of the fuel is either too much for the vacuum created by the carburetor venturi and no fuel at all will flow for some attitudes, or the weight causes the mixture to change.

I believe some larger, advanced aerobatic planes do have fuel pumps/regulators and the fuel tank at the CG.
DreamArcher is offline Find More Posts by DreamArcher
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 06, 2011, 08:54 PM
emillard is offline
Find More Posts by emillard
Registered User
USA, KY, Lexington
Joined Dec 2007
640 Posts
Wow. I've never considered how the amount of fuel would affect CG. As I think about it, it absolutely would affect it.

I guess this would be the same with most all glow planes. Is this just something that is accepted and that as long as you fly within a CG range you're OK?
emillard is offline Find More Posts by emillard
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 06, 2011, 10:30 PM
road_rascal is offline
Find More Posts by road_rascal
Crashasaurus Dumbthumus
road_rascal's Avatar
USA, MN, Apple Valley
Joined Dec 2008
1,510 Posts
When I had my OS.46 glow powered Escapade I never noticed the difference in flying characteristics between a full tank and empty tank. It flew great no matter what. I really like my electric one now that I'm considering getting another Escapade and put a 4-stroker in it.

Oh- yeah! 1000 posts!
road_rascal is offline Find More Posts by road_rascal
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 07, 2011, 01:38 AM
DreamArcher is offline
Find More Posts by DreamArcher
DreamArcher's Avatar
Joined Apr 2008
1,980 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by emillard View Post
Is this just something that is accepted and that as long as you fly within a CG range you're OK?
The rule is to always adjust the CG with the tank empty. This way the plane can only be nose heavy and never tail heavy. You know the saying, "A nose heavy plane flies poorly. A tail heavy plane flies once.
DreamArcher is offline Find More Posts by DreamArcher
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 07, 2011, 06:12 AM
Ken Myers is offline
Find More Posts by Ken Myers
Registered User
Ken Myers's Avatar
Commerce Township, MI
Joined Aug 2001
4,815 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turner2 View Post
This begs the question, why aren't glow planes designed with the fuel tank at the CG. Seems like a major design failing to me but it seems to be common over many different brands.
Back in the early to mid 80's we used pumps on our AMA pattern planes and placed the tank on the CG. Not sure what they do now, besides going to electric power.
Ken Myers is offline Find More Posts by Ken Myers
Reply With Quote
Old Apr 07, 2011, 08:39 PM
Taildragger55 is offline
Find More Posts by Taildragger55
Registered User
Taildragger55's Avatar
Anchorage, Alaska
Joined Nov 2008
604 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turner2 View Post
This begs the question, why aren't glow planes designed with the fuel tank at the CG. Seems like a major design failing to me but it seems to be common over many different brands.
Because the CG would still change radically as the fuel sloshes forward or rearward depending on the attitude of the airplane. With the tank forward of the CG, you go from very nose heavy to slightly nose heavy or not at all if you run the tank empty.
Taildragger55 is offline Find More Posts by Taildragger55
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Great Planes Escapade...has anyone flown? research_guy Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) 5 Aug 05, 2002 11:33 AM
Great Planes Escapade dave_lilley Electric Plane Talk 0 Nov 15, 2001 11:57 PM
Great Planes Escapade dave_lilley Site Chat 0 Nov 15, 2001 11:57 PM
Great Planes Escapade, a sweet little ARF! Paul Penney Parkflyers 9 Sep 18, 2001 10:13 PM
Great planes Escapade Paul Penney Foamies (Kits) 0 Sep 09, 2001 06:38 PM