SMALL - Telemetry SMALL - Radio
Thread Tools
Old Dec 19, 2014, 10:11 AM
Wolpertinger is offline
Find More Posts by Wolpertinger
Formerly "vonJaerschky"
Wolpertinger's Avatar
Canada, BC, Comox
Joined Nov 2003
7,608 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CryHavoc View Post
It always makes me cringe when someone who sees a plane flying tail low, and without any additional information, calls out "Its tail heavy". It instantly tells me they have zero clue why and how airplanes fly.

Mike
It always makes me cringe when one of the self proclaimed wise ones jumps into the middle of things with no background knowledge of the person they are slamming. Yeah, that's me, zero clue about why airplane fly. Comments like that (and not many are aimed at me) are why my participation in RC Groups has dwindled. I can't seem to put up the mental barrier to protect me from the moronic generalizations any more. On to my ignore list you go. Maybe I can last another day.

Oh, by the way, the model floats around beautifully now. Perfect flight attitude, flares beautifully. I couldn't ask for more. All it needed was a bit of nose weight. Huh. How about that?
Wolpertinger is offline Find More Posts by Wolpertinger
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Dec 19, 2014, 01:44 PM
NOISY MUSE is offline
Find More Posts by NOISY MUSE
Registered User
USA, Mt, Billings
Joined Mar 2009
345 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBnJ View Post
Noisy Muse, looks like the answer to your battery question is in the first post of this thread.
Thanks much PBnJ...not sure how the heck I missed that. I even had that quote cut and pasted into my notes. Problem solved.

If others are working on this kit or HAVE built it I would like to hear from you. I have a couple questions re: framing the fuse. Nothing critical, but I'd like to avoid extra work if possible.

Thanks!

Scott
NOISY MUSE is offline Find More Posts by NOISY MUSE
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 19, 2014, 02:58 PM
CryHavoc is online now
Find More Posts by CryHavoc
UAS Pilot/Tech Instructor
CryHavoc's Avatar
United States, CA, San Diego
Joined Apr 2000
1,623 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonJaerschky View Post
It always makes me cringe when one of the self proclaimed wise ones jumps into the middle of things with no background knowledge of the person they are slamming. Yeah, that's me, zero clue about why airplane fly. Comments like that (and not many are aimed at me) are why my participation in RC Groups has dwindled. I can't seem to put up the mental barrier to protect me from the moronic generalizations any more. On to my ignore list you go. Maybe I can last another day.

Oh, by the way, the model floats around beautifully now. Perfect flight attitude, flares beautifully. I couldn't ask for more. All it needed was a bit of nose weight. Huh. How about that?
That's bullpucky. A CG change has NO EFFECT on the angle of attack necessary for the wing to provide enough lift to fly the plane at the speeds you were flying it at in the video. A wing HAS to provide enough lift to fly the system for a given airspeed. The only ways to generate more lift is either, more airspeed, or more angle of attack. In the case of the plane in video posted, the tail was flying low(i.e. higher angle of attack) so the wing could get enough lift to fly the plane. Its a DECALAGE issue. CG is only going to affect is stability.

So you can come on here all backside ego hurt about my comment and make all kinds of claims about your magical CG change but I call BS.

Mike
CryHavoc is online now Find More Posts by CryHavoc
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 19, 2014, 08:20 PM
bwoollia is offline
Find More Posts by bwoollia
bwoollia's Avatar
United States, CO, Colorado Springs
Joined May 2008
3,680 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CryHavoc View Post
That's bullpucky. A CG change has NO EFFECT on the angle of attack necessary for the wing to provide enough lift to fly the plane at the speeds you were flying it at in the video. A wing HAS to provide enough lift to fly the system for a given airspeed. The only ways to generate more lift is either, more airspeed, or more angle of attack. In the case of the plane in video posted, the tail was flying low(i.e. higher angle of attack) so the wing could get enough lift to fly the plane. Its a DECALAGE issue. CG is only going to affect is stability.

So you can come on here all backside ego hurt about my comment and make all kinds of claims about your magical CG change but I call BS.

Mike
Mike, nobody was referring to the attitude of the plane in straight flight. It was dragging its tail in the turn. We're all familiar with what you're explaining.
bwoollia is offline Find More Posts by bwoollia
Site Sponsor
Old Dec 19, 2014, 10:18 PM
Wolpertinger is offline
Find More Posts by Wolpertinger
Formerly "vonJaerschky"
Wolpertinger's Avatar
Canada, BC, Comox
Joined Nov 2003
7,608 Posts
Dang Brian, you had to go and quote his message after I put him on my ignore list. Well, at least the citation justified my decision. Peace out, all.
Wolpertinger is offline Find More Posts by Wolpertinger
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2014, 03:25 PM
bshultz327 is offline
Find More Posts by bshultz327
Branjo
Joined Sep 2013
328 Posts
Mike, simply a rude thing to say, and a rude way to sum up von Jaerschkys explanation. That's not what this site is about, and it's nothing anyone here wants to hear. If you had a genuine comment to make on the subject so be it. State your concern, but why do it in such an arrogant manner?

I enjoy this site, and I like the intelligence and skill that MOST have here because no one deserves to be made to feel stupid or less because of their skill or knowledge level. It's a hobby, and it's nice to help people. That's what we want to do.

VonJaerschky I dig the EIII, very nice job and I have enjoyed many of your builds, posts and instructional videos. Thanks for your time.

Branden
bshultz327 is offline Find More Posts by bshultz327
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 26, 2014, 07:53 PM
Thermalin is offline
Find More Posts by Thermalin
I'm a pilot... 100 yrs to late
Thermalin's Avatar
USA, FL, Palm Harbor
Joined Jan 2005
3,694 Posts
I looked at the Aereodrome but went with BUSA as its made for glow - 4 stroke power. With some mods it will look much more scale as well. But also looking for a park flyer sized EIII too
Thermalin is offline Find More Posts by Thermalin
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale Fokker EIII laser cut kits FLYBOB54 Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) 28 Mar 11, 2014 08:26 PM
AerodromeRC 1/6th scale Fokker EIII and GWS powered 1/12th scale Fokker DR.1 AerodromeRC Scale Kit/Scratch Built 1 Aug 23, 2005 08:30 PM
Wattage Fokker Eindecker EIII 400 ARF. Anyone? Dampy Parkflyers 15 Sep 13, 2003 07:36 PM
Fokker EIII plan PETERRAKE Scale Kit/Scratch Built 5 Aug 24, 2003 06:06 AM