Guns are objects. They sit there harmlessly until chosen by a human, acting on ideas, decides to do something with it.

What ideas, one might ask.....?

The five worst mass killings where a firearm was used, have a common thread.

Hint #1: They didn’t belong to the NRA. They don’t fit the stereotype of the “red-neck” gun owner

Check it out …

1) Ft Hood: Registered Democrat/Muslim.

2) Columbine: Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals.

3) Virginia Tech: Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff.

4) Colorado Theater: Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal.

5) Connecticut School Shooter: Registered Democrat; hated Christians.

Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal Democrats.

You'd have more luck stopping mass shootings if you banned moonbattery instead of firearms...

Originally Posted by MtnGoat

Guns are objects. They sit there harmlessly until chosen by a human, acting on ideas, decides to do something with it.

What ideas, one might ask.....?



You'd have more luck stopping mass shootings if you banned moonbattery instead of firearms...

One more obvious detail. No black or Hispanic male shooters involved.

Originally Posted by FlyCush

One more obvious detail. No black or Hispanic male shooters involved.

Hey, you're right - they're too busy shooting it out with handguns in the demoncratic voting districts

Yep, mass shootings are mostly a white thing, same with serial murderers. *shrug*

The Ft. Hood shooting shouldn't be in the same category as any of these others. It was about as much a random mass shooting as the 9/11 attacks were just regular airplane crashes.

Time to lock up white male democrats for safety.

Originally Posted by MtnGoat

Guns are objects. They sit there harmlessly until chosen by a human, acting on ideas, decides to do something with it.

What ideas, one might ask.....?



You'd have more luck stopping mass shootings if you banned moonbattery instead of firearms...

Germans.

Originally Posted by BushmanLA

Yep, mass shootings are mostly a white thing, same with serial murderers. *shrug*

The Ft. Hood shooting shouldn't be in the same category as any of these others. It was about as much a random mass shooting as the 9/11 attacks were just regular airplane crashes.

Totally incorrect. Mass shootings that make headline news are mostly a white thing.

Originally Posted by saltyzoo

Totally incorrect. Mass shootings that make headline news are mostly a white thing.

A white DEMOCRAT thing

It's tragically not funny how the same folks that call Travon Martin a child, complete turn a blind eye to all the "children" being slaughtered on a regular basis. They cry a river for the middle class white children in suburbia though.

Originally Posted by saltyzoo

It's tragically not funny how the same folks that call Travon Martin a child, complete turn a blind eye to all the "children" being slaughtered on a regular basis. They cry a river for the middle class white children in suburbia though.

Are you talking about all those children in Chicago, for example?

I have no idea who they is, but I think it all is tragic and needs to be dealth with to help reduce the risk factors.

AM Radio at it's finest. Shame that anyone would take it at face value. But such is the level of discourse common among LTUP. Which is why I come here very little any more.

Originally Posted by thunder1

AM Radio at it's finest. Shame that anyone would take it at face value. But such is the level of discourse common among LTUP. Which is why I come here very little any more.

Is the claim actually false? When a persons chief concern when confronted with assertions is not the truth of the assertions but instead the identity of the source, making ones self scarce is itself an act of raising the level of discourse at the venue seeing less of them.

Originally Posted by MtnGoat

Is the claim actually false? When a persons chief concern when confronted with assertions is not the truth of the assertions but instead the identity of the source, making ones self scarce is itself an act of raising the level of discourse at the venue seeing less of them.

Yes. Please do yourself a favor and verify just one, Adam Lanza. Verify that he was a registered democrat. Do that, and then get back to us. Otherwise, it's all just pulp fiction. Bad pulp fiction at that.

http://www.examiner.com/article/the-...rats-is-a-myth

Originally Posted by MtnGoat

Guns

[snip]

I agree. You're catching on.

Originally Posted by thunder1

Yes. Please do yourself a favor and verify just one, Adam Lanza. Verify that he was a registered democrat. Do that, and then get back to us. Otherwise, it's all just pulp fiction. Bad pulp fiction at that.

http://www.examiner.com/article/the-...rats-is-a-myth

Do us all a favor and go after true/false on the first round instead of leading off attacking sources, is my suggestion.

The link you presented does make some good arguments, I'll say that for it.