|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Vienna, Austria
Joined Apr 2007
1,322 Posts
|
how to balance: static at all? what order the diff. parts?
Quote:
What others have found -.and I agree 100% - is that you first have to dynamically balance your motor. I was not successful with the balancer and now just run it, mounted in the housing, c-clip removed in my hand to feel the vibrations, peel the sticker off, put small stripes of tape on the bell at diffferent places and run it up each time to feel the balance - in the end add thick CA and kicker in the bell between the magnets where it is needed. Not difficult to get it to run nicely, especially the L-2855 series seem to need that. If you DO NOT dynamically balance the (out-of balance outrunner - inrunners are unsually balanced) then you will never get the assembly dynamically balanced right because an imbalance in the rear (motor) can only be balanced by an appropriate imbalance in front in one dimension (rotation) but then it will wobble in the transverse axis. Also I have found that it is a lot easier to balance the setup once the motor is balanced. Now for rotor and spinner: Ideally, you would not balace statically either of them separately at all but just both of them together dynamically. Problem is, the spinners are imprecise in their seat on the rotor, and in order to turn the rotor, you need to take off the spinner... So I think it is still best to NOT statically balance the rotor (for the 10- and 12-bladers which are pretty good, in the case of cheap 5-bladers, e.g., you would need some crude static balancing to get the worst out). Then balance the rotor dynamically, e.g., by the clock method, and then adding the spinner - and only add weight to the spinner if you don't find a spinner position which balances the assembly nicely. That's what works for me now without any fancy technology. Comments and suggestions welcome. I am quite frustrated that I am not able to use the dynamic balancer for the motor, and also the rotor I prefer to balance with the clock method. I put it on Bob's balancer only at the very end with the spinner on to get the very last bit out if needed. cheers Clemens |
|
|
|
|
|
Australia, VIC, Melbourne
Joined Nov 2006
6,526 Posts
|
hehe, I can see the logic in those processes.....
Today I attempted to balance an L2855.... It has a terrible noise... buzz sort of.... at a few RPM areas. It seems to be the bearings to me. No balancing attempts could reduce that..... so I gave up for now. I then balanced the shaft/rotor/nut assemly statically - testing the rotor at various spots around the shaft adaptor too. It needed a few 'small chunks of fibre tape'. Enough to be measurable (I should have weighed the clump! DOH) The I put the shaft adaptor onto the motor - an inrunner (not the lousy L2855!!) and checked it for running true - it looked perfect to me. It was already a nice snug fit on the shaft and testing by hand, and by Phone Accelerometer, the vibration was negligible. I put the fan on and tested it by Phone Accelerometer.... it was "approx 10m/s/s".... I just rotate it approx 45deg for each test (very easy to do in situ), and within a few moves it passed through 3m/s/s... so after checking it getting larger again past that, I went back to that spot. That proved to be super smooth. Perfect. I don't know what part the rotation actually 'matches up' to give optimal balance... probably a bit of a few areas. eg possible motor imbalance, or possible shaft adaptor on motor shaft 'error'. So I grabbed another one and did all the same stuff. 7m/s/s at best, but that is still very smooth anyway. Its worst spot was about 12m/s/s, which was still not terrible by any means. So I would say anything 5m/s/s, or better, is a good result. Not a single 'buzz' etc at any RPM point. But I can see that 3m/s/s is possible, so I will revisit the first one again tomorrow to pinpoint HOW to get it under 5m/s/s also. After doing this process I doubt that NOT Static Balancing the rotor/shaft/nut could match the end result they got. The rotor would have been a dominant offset that probably would not have anything else to cancel out enough. But I would have to do them again with NO balance weights in them, to see what that really did. Plus I wouldn't mind pulling out the weights and weighing them to see what amount it was that they needed. So I guess I will try that when I re-do the first one.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I mounted the Het 2w23 2950kv inrunner into my CS12-70mm.
I also looked at the static balance of the rotor and seemed near perfect without need for much adjustment. I recieved the 4 grub shaft adaptors with my fans. I had to ream out the centre hole with a round file to provide clearance. I would imagine there would be a brief break in conditioning period for both the motor and the fan. This is the resultant numbers I got with the first bench test: Warthog bench tests Het 2w23 - 4s 3500mAh 35C cs12-70 72Ap settle at 65amps WOT 15 seconds 987Wp settle at 890watts Sorry I don't have a method for measuring thrust yet... Would a scale behind the fan work? |
|
|
|
|
Australia, VIC, Melbourne
Joined Nov 2006
6,526 Posts
|
I grabbed about 5 Accelerometer apps (Android), 4 free ones. Most were fine enough anyway. All I wanted was the readouts, and leave the point where weight is needed up to me.
So the iPhone should have plenty too. The one I liked best was "Accelerometer Monitor". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia, VIC, Melbourne
Joined Nov 2006
6,526 Posts
|
Whalley.... I assume/hope that the shaft adaptor filing was really just to clean out the burrs from the grub screws!! If it was cleaned up and still too small.....never file out a shaft adaptor! hehe
At best you will make it worse than it was.... they need to be DEAD TRUE. Which maybe it wasn't even in the first place, but doing something by hand is unlikely to ever improve anything! So the first thing to check for is burrs from the grub screw holes. They don't clean them up at all internally, so there can be sharp edges in there. they will actually clean up when you push a shaft through them - IF your shaft fits the real hole diameter ok. You can use some other shaft to clean it too.... a file is not a great idea, or at least be VERY careful. If a shaft does not fit at all, because it truly is a bit larger than the shaft adaptor hole, then HEAT UP the shaft adaptor. This is actually a good situation to have! As long as it is only that bit too small..... Heating it up expands it, so the hole gets 'bigger' temporarily. Heat it up with a hot air gun preferably... or over a flame (not too close to go black from soot!)... and put it onto the motor shaft. You then have a rock solid fitting result! The opposite of this is having a LOOSE motor shaft, which you can never truly fix 100%. So you really want a firm/snug fit... or too tight.... rather than loose/sloppy. You don't get much choice... you get what they gave you. If it is a terrible shaft adaptor you really should buy an aftermarket one from ExtremRC or Tamjets. But also beware as it might be your MOTOR shaft that is the part that is not to specs.... eg a 4mm one that is really 3.85mm etc. So check that with a vernier too. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
In the meantime I benched the second pair same setup. The fan was pushing a 1000 watts steady @ 76 amps but I couldn't get the spinner to balance. At mid throttle it sounded rough but at wot it was smooth. Without the spinner the fan was dead quiet and smooth for the whole throttle band. How do I balance this spinner (aluminum one)? |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Australia, VIC, Melbourne
Joined Nov 2006
6,526 Posts
|
I have never balanced a spinner, but you should be able to just add a drop (drop by drop) of CA inside it...... but to WHERE? LOL. Lucky dip, test, then scrape it off.
This is where the Dynamic Balancers that have a processor and strobe light show their best strength! (eg Bobs balancer, or Vortex) - seeing they can show you WHERE weight is needed. And even how much. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Australia, WA, Perth
Joined May 2007
3,129 Posts
|
Pete (australian, not oestereicher!)
How repeatable are you g readings? I use a blob of blu-tac between the phone and fan, and find that it's only repeatable for one session. Once I take the fan off, I use a slightly difference amount of blu-tac next time, hence an absolute number becomes meaningless. Any chance you can work out what 3ms^-2 comes to in G (units of unbalance)? |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion Change Sun 10 blade 70mm (Test Results Consolidated) | 901racer | Electric Ducted Fan Jet Talk | 171 | Jun 08, 2013 08:47 AM |
| Discussion Change Sun 70mm 10 blade EDF | SpaceAviation | Electric Plane Talk | 8 | Jan 22, 2013 04:06 AM |
| For Sale NEW! EXTREME CNC ALLOY Change Sun 10 BLADE 70mm FAN | rlc2052 | Aircraft - Electric - Jets (FS/W) | 1 | Nov 01, 2012 02:24 PM |
| Sold Change Sun 70mm 10 Blade EDF | TreeFlyer | Aircraft - Electric - Jets (FS/W) | 5 | Mar 01, 2012 03:50 PM |
| Sold New Change Sun 70mm 10 blade fan. | TreeFlyer | Aircraft - Electric - Jets (FS/W) | 4 | Feb 29, 2012 05:59 PM |