http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...4#post23859114

No, I think the issue is simple and it looks like you're obfuscating by daftness...again, it's cute at first...gets old after about the 214319184n;rwe post

I'm still here and I've cited my positions with easily sourced or sources themselves.

I was not calling the poster daft but he was using a well known debate tactic called obfuscation by obtuseness (daft, slowness) in asking over and over again for replied to post as if I haven't replied to them or change the subject of the request.

I was relating a debate tactic not labeling the poster daft...

If this is not the reason for the infraction warning point then I'd like to know

regards

Link - http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showp...&postcount=121
Warning - Trolling (Provocation)

Issue:

Originally Posted by erh7771

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...4#post23859114



I was not calling the poster daft but he was using a well known debate tactic called obfuscation by obtuseness (daft, slowness) in asking over and over again for replied to post as if I haven't replied to them or change the subject of the request.

I was relating a debate tactic not labeling the poster daft...

If this is not the reason for the infraction warning point then I'd like to know

regards

This post has been edited.
No appeal is possible.