|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would caution against using flapperons (drooped ailerons) as these may well case tip-stalling. Spoilerons (raised ailerons) might be useful on landing as the TS is quite 'floaty', but it's not that bad when you get used to it. Fun to play with, but not essential.
With the stock motors direct drive on 8 cells the Gunther props are actually pretty hard to beat. I flight-tested a big range of alternatives, and the only ones that gave a slight improvement were expensive - 2 blade VarioProps (6" diameter, set to about 3.5" pitch). Gearing and bigger props will typically give you more thrust and a little less speed, but if you get the setup wrong you can easily end up with a plane that flies worse than stock! You have the same basic amount of power, you're just using it in a different way (actually you have a little less power as there are always some losses in the gearboxes). So copy a setup that somebody else has flown and is happy with, at least to start off. Using can 480s (Permax or similar) direct drive would probably be the quickest / easiest / cheapest way to get a slight boost in performance and efficiency. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have towed with my long-suffering Twinstar, stock motors and props, 8 x 2000 sub-C nicads. On this setup it takes 26 amps static, and will tow a hand launch size glider. I've tried slightly heavier gliders, a middle sized 24 ounce and a 2metre, couldn't get the combo up to speed from launch, and almost had a glider on my neck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am using Graupner inline gearboxes, 4:1 with APC-E 11x8.5 props. This gives more static thrust than direct drive, but a bit less pitch speed. With the ESC brake off the big props freewheel when you cut the throttle ... they act like airbrakes, and you can make a nice steep 'STOL' landing approach
I prefer inline boxes as they give a neat/tidy/simple installation and they are usually quieter and more rugged than the external 'frame' type. Against that of course they are more expensive! I was a bit disappointed to find that the Graupner 4:1 boxes weren't ballraced and aren't particularly quiet. I have their 2.8:1 S600 gearbox, which is an absolute gem, fully ballraced and very smooth and quiet. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
But, like you say, they fly so well stock. Mine has flown hundreds of flights, has taught two people to fly, has found a lost model using it for aerial photography, has been smashed to pieces twice...and still uses the original motors. I'm amazed how good these can motors are. Mike |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Of course with two ESCs and a computer TX you are able to set up assymetric throttle to rudder mixing for lots of fun at low speed!
|
|
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| multiplex twinstar pictures ?? | loopin | Foamies (Kits) | 31 | Oct 28, 2002 06:08 PM |
| Multiplex twinstar???? | big-john-48 | Foamies (Kits) | 4 | Feb 23, 2002 08:31 AM |
| WTB: Multiplex Twinstar | 40acrefield | Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) | 0 | Dec 27, 2001 09:55 AM |
| how much does a multiplex twinstar weigh? | flyer10 | Foamies (Kits) | 5 | Apr 24, 2001 01:34 PM |
| Best ESC for Multiplex Twinstar?? | deadcell | Power Systems | 15 | Apr 23, 2001 04:44 AM |