|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
| This thread is privately moderated by savage 40, who may elect to delete unwanted replies. |
|
|
|||
|
United States, CA, Oroville
Joined Sep 2007
79 Posts
|
Moon Video
My moon video taken with an 8" scope and hacked webcam. But using the 808 #16 for this would be cool!
|
||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States, CA, Oroville
Joined Sep 2007
79 Posts
|
Here's what I did.. Take the camera apart and remove the lens.. Then (daylight hours) I focused the scope on a distant location like an antenna or light pole.. Then remove the eyepiece from the scope.. Place the camera ove the eyepiece socket moving it in and out while watching the laptop screen.. When it came into focus I looked to see how far away the camera needed to be from the socket and then proceeded to construct the tube for it.
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
I guess this loses any magnification that an eyepiece can provide, but it will still be a fun project |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Cumbria in the U.K
Joined Jan 2008
1,789 Posts
|
I am impressed with the moon video.
I am itching to have a go, first clear night looks to be Wednesday here. I have converted a No11 HD keychain camera to fit on my 8.5 inch reflector. I removed the lens, easy as it just unscrewed on mine but some are fastened with glue and might be harder to remove. I had some thin brass tube that just fitted into the eyepiece holder on the scope. I cut a piece just long enough to fit into the eyepiece socket and then epoxied it onto the front of the No11 camera. The tube is bigger in diameter than the No11 camera is thick. I just epoxied 2 thin pieces of wood onto the camera body to fill up the gap. You have to be careful not to cause a problem in getting to the buttons to work the camera. Pretty it isn't - functional it is. The camera fits into place like a normal eyepiece. There is plenty of adjustment available on my focuser but it only needs a small amount of focus adjustment to bring the camera into focus. It's not a big amount and is fairly close to the position where a 40mm eyepiece is in focus. I use the No11 in webcam mode. I also have a converted Logitech quickcam webcam.... modified nearly the same way as the No11. I have only had chance to try the 2 cams on a small (and not very good) telescope but anticipate good results off my bigger reflector. The No11 keychain camera is capable of giving a sharper image compared to the Logitech webcam. However, the image is pink tinged ! This is not a problem for still photos as they can easily be altered but could be a problem with video. I use a couple of "normal" webcam programmes that are available in Linux. There are no proprietary drivers used for the 2 cameras, just what is provided by the Linux kernel. I had some of the "dreaded" dust on the CMOS chip. Being a gentle soul who approaches everything very cautiously..... I just bunged the nozzle of an industrial vacuum cleaner over the tube that fits the camera into the eyepiece and give it a damned good going over ! ![]() My delicate approach seems to have got the sensor clean of dust. Perhaps Tom will know if the pink colour can be got rid of ? |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cumbria in the U.K
Joined Jan 2008
1,789 Posts
|
Quote:
I anticipated problems when fitting a webcam. Would I have to have a bigger range of adjustment ? It turned out that I only needed to fit the camera onto a tube that just fitted into the eyepiece holder. Focusing on stars, the moon and Jupiter were easy. The camera focuses at nearly the same setting as a 40mm eyepiece. Terrestrial objects needed a much longer focus tube than I have on my scope. Had to resort to setting the guide scope up in the dark ! |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
I've used lens cleaning air brushes and cleaning solution to clean my CMOS arrays on a couple of my 808 HD key cams, with good results. Never tried a vacuum... I'd probably end up sucking it into the dust bag! I think a critical part is to get the CMOS array exactly perpendicular to the axis of the eyepiece holder. This is necessary to have the entire array in sharp focus across the entire frame. I had forgotten about the IR filter, but would try to find a suitable larger lens filter that works, then cement it flat across the front of the plastic lens module. Then arrange to make a cut across the eyepiece tube that is exactly perpendicular to the axis, perhaps with an appropriate blade on my radial arm saw. That should get it pretty close. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cumbria in the U.K
Joined Jan 2008
1,789 Posts
|
Hi Tom,
I thought it might be down to the infrared filter. I will see how I go without one. On still photos of the moon it's not a problem as i can rectify the image afterwards. I am interested to see how the Logitech webcam performs on my large scope. I can take video and capture colour with that for now. The small scope I have used for initial tests is a pretty poor telescope really. It just gave me a chance to nip out and get some initial photos when there was a brief break in the cloud cover. The images from the big reflector will have far better resolution and also be far more magnified than these first, snatched attempts. Getting the CMOS chip correctly aligned will pay dividends. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion NBC tom Brokaw" Gov got us to the moon" | SPEED-E-FLYER | Life, The Universe, and Politics | 38 | Aug 31, 2012 03:57 PM |
| For Sale Ace Puddlemaster discontinued many moons ago. | Beardiedrg | Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) | 0 | Jun 29, 2012 12:30 PM |
| Fly-In Moon Port Modelers RC Club, Titusville, Florida 06-16-2012 | PittSpecial | Electric Flight Events | 0 | Jun 12, 2012 08:50 AM |
| Discussion NEW Video !! Crescent moon foam plane by HaddadRC | littlephoenix | Foamies (Scratchbuilt) | 5 | Jul 24, 2009 10:27 PM |
| SPRINTER to the MOON video | SPEED-E-FLYER | High Performance | 16 | Dec 23, 2004 10:58 AM |