SMALL - espritmodel.com SMALL - Telemetry SMALL - Radio
Reply
Thread Tools
Old Jan 16, 2013, 07:31 PM
weisenflymanheimer
snakecrew's Avatar
Crested Butte, Colorado
Joined Dec 2007
1,214 Posts
Discussion
For those who advocate against Lipos in sailplanes

apparently 787's don't fair well either
snakecrew is offline Find More Posts by snakecrew
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Jan 17, 2013, 02:10 AM
Silent Flight
Twyl's Avatar
United States, CA, Cypress
Joined Jul 2005
3,951 Posts
Nor your Chevy Volt



That said, supposedly size does matter and a larger lipo will be more difficult to keep stable.

-Jonathan
Twyl is offline Find More Posts by Twyl
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 03:02 AM
Go fast, turn hard
Tailslide UK's Avatar
Berkshire, England
Joined Aug 2006
1,202 Posts
Hat's off to the engineer though. The box looks like it contained it. Don't know anything about the event, so just going by the picture. I hope no one got hurt.

Tailslide
Tailslide UK is offline Find More Posts by Tailslide UK
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 03:06 AM
Silent Flight
Twyl's Avatar
United States, CA, Cypress
Joined Jul 2005
3,951 Posts
From what I heard, the potential dangers of Lipos was well in the minds of the designers and the FAA and numerous precautions were put into place to contain any such issue. Looks like whatever those precautions were, they did the job like you said.

-Jonathan
Twyl is offline Find More Posts by Twyl
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 03:16 AM
Hundredaire
mams1's Avatar
Newcastle Australia
Joined Oct 2008
1,533 Posts
Wasn't it a Li-on battery?
mams1 is offline Find More Posts by mams1
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 03:21 AM
Brett
bjaffee's Avatar
So Cal
Joined Apr 2002
5,298 Posts
Is anyone running LiFe packs in gliders? I've heard they don't require a regulator, and they are not as prone to fire as LiPos.
bjaffee is offline Find More Posts by bjaffee
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 06:26 AM
Mechanical gypsy
Spain
Joined Dec 2006
543 Posts
Boeing has Lithium iron batteries ( LiFe) in the B787. I think it has a set at the front for the cockpit etc and another set down the back for the APU.

I'm not a battery expert by any means but I am surprised such technology is being used in an aircraft if there is a risk of it catching fire and thus having to be contained. Normally in an aircraft the only thing you expect to burn is the fuel, not the battery.

I think most people who use Lipo`s know about the risks, and that the risk is real. It's hard to believe Boeing would risk their product just for the supposed benefit of a new battery type.

Anyway, hope Boeing get this plane ( not just the batteries ) sorted out asap. It doesn't look good for the moment, thats for sure.

C
chris s is offline Find More Posts by chris s
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 10:31 AM
Feeling FrSky
surfimp's Avatar
United States, CA, Santa Barbara
Joined Feb 2003
20,091 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris s View Post
Boeing has Lithium iron batteries ( LiFe) in the B787.
The articles I've read have indicated that the fires were caused by lithium ion batteries, not LiFePo ("lithium iron phosphate" aka "LiFe") chemistry... please cite a source that indicates otherwise?

As well as I understand it, lithium ion batteries were the first widely adopted of the lithium-based battery chemistries. This chemistry has mainstream use in everything from mobile phones to laptop computers to fullscale aircraft.

After lithium ion came lithium polymer, the ubiquitous "LiPo", which haven't been quite as widely adopted in mainstream use - although they have absolutely revolutionized the R/C hobby industry and have been the "magic bullet" that put electric power systems on par (and in many instances, vastly superior) to internal combustion power systems.

Most recent are the lithium iron phosphate batteries, known to us a "LiFePo" or "LiFe", which were initially created by A123 Systems and used in power tools. They definitely have a reputation for being safer to handle than lithium polymer and lithium ion batteries, not the least of which relates to the fact that the cells produced by A123 were designed with built-in safety measure to more safely deal with any thermal runaway issues which might occur. When first released, they were also capable of being safely charged and discharged at higher rates than comparable lipo cells, although modern lipos have caught up to and surpassed them in many regards. They also hold a charge for a very long time, and feature a very flat discharge curve. Besides not being offered in as many convenient form factors as NiMH batteries, they are basically as perfect of a receiver pack as we can ask for in model soaring.

Steve
surfimp is offline Find More Posts by surfimp
RCG Plus Member
Last edited by surfimp; Jan 17, 2013 at 10:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 11:03 AM
Objects in mirror are losing
1000MPH's Avatar
USA, NV, Reno
Joined May 2003
3,587 Posts
A quick search bring up this article...
http://www.greencarreports.com/news/...ic-cars-umm-no
"The cells in the 787, from Japanese company GS Yuasa, use a cobalt oxide (CoO2) chemistry, just as mobile-phone and laptop batteries do."
1000MPH is offline Find More Posts by 1000MPH
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 11:08 AM
Urban sloper
GentlemanRider's Avatar
Italia, Liguria, Genova
Joined Dec 2011
55 Posts
I'm using a 2 cells Life on my Le Fishray. It's quite big but lightweight and has quite some capacity (1450mAh). That's enough to keep it in 'permanent storage mode': I charge it to 80% when I'm back from the slope and forget about it until I have time to fly again

I have lots of NiMhs in my wings (permanently embedded in the foam), they require topping up before flying after some idle time and if I don't fly for let's say... 4 to 6 weeks I cycle them to avoid the chemistry from sleeping.

I have a 2 cell Lipo in the M60 with Corona HV servos (no BEC) but it's only 800 mAh so the storage level isn't safe to fly. I'm scared about leaving it fully charged because I've been told that LiPos don't like that. I charge it before flying, like the NiMhs, except it accepts a higher current.

IMHO a slightly oversized LiFe is the best so far. Goes without BEC wit almost all servos, doesn't require attention and the models are always ready for the last minute trip to the slope
GentlemanRider is offline Find More Posts by GentlemanRider
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 11:21 AM
Mechanical gypsy
Spain
Joined Dec 2006
543 Posts
You are right about the battery Steve, its a Lithium-ion-polymer. Don't know what the abbreviation for that is.
chris s is offline Find More Posts by chris s
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 08:32 PM
Lover of fast slope gliders!
glasairIII's Avatar
United States, AZ, Goodyear
Joined Apr 2004
557 Posts
Years ago I saw the after effects of a nickel-cadmium battery thermal runaway. This was on a Cessna Citation. We found the battery remnants on the ground. We also found a square hole were in burnt it's way out the bottom of the plane At the time, this style of battery was fairly new to the industry. Now, it's used in all the commercial jets. Airbus, Boeing etc..... And I've haven't seen any issues, except dead battery's from being left on


Bottom line, Boeing will find the cause. And, I'd hazard a guess that they will temporarily go back to the tried and true nickel-cadmium. I'd also hazard a guess they went to the new technology for the same reason we do. Weight and capacity.
glasairIII is offline Find More Posts by glasairIII
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 08:47 PM
Brett
bjaffee's Avatar
So Cal
Joined Apr 2002
5,298 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris s View Post
You are right about the battery Steve, its a Lithium-ion-polymer. Don't know what the abbreviation for that is.
Isn't that just a LiPo? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium...olymer_battery
bjaffee is offline Find More Posts by bjaffee
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 09:12 PM
Objects in mirror are losing
1000MPH's Avatar
USA, NV, Reno
Joined May 2003
3,587 Posts
I found this too...
http://www.s399157097.onlinehome.us/...s/LVP10-65.pdf
1000MPH is offline Find More Posts by 1000MPH
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 10:43 PM
Hump or Death?
O.G. Gamesta's Avatar
United States, CA, San Clemente
Joined Oct 2012
386 Posts
People are for/against LiPo batteries for various reasons. It looks like many r/x and servo managers are upping the voltage requirement to accommodate the many folks who want to LiPo their planes. The advantages of a LiPo system are huge.

Where I live and fly, you risk burning down the whole of SoCal. During our current Santa Anna wind event, everything is so dry, even the bushes just crumble like dry hay. I've never run a battery down on a plane in one session as I usually bring a couple or more planes with me when I fly just to mix it up.
O.G. Gamesta is offline Find More Posts by O.G. Gamesta
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Data A handy site for those who don't think in metric units. peterlngh Electric Sailplanes 7 Jan 25, 2013 05:33 PM
Whoops! "...Forgive us as we forgive those who trespass against us..." iwannarc Life, The Universe, and Politics 25 Feb 03, 2008 04:09 PM
Alert For Those of You Who Use Lipos in Your Planes Minimole Electric Plane Talk 12 Dec 19, 2005 03:09 PM
Those who courted Saddam while he gassed Iranians are now waging war against him Hammer Head Life, The Universe, and Politics 39 Mar 26, 2003 03:57 AM