|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The new or old scissor mechanism strut does not work for the nosegear with the new electric units : the strut hits against the screwdrive motor.
Which means either buying new struts that cost more than the airframe or design a new nosegear strut (here a' la' T-45) that will retract fully into the nose.. |
|
Latest blog entry: BAe Hawk 90mm EDF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a picture of the nosegear retract problem, and my solution. Not truly scale, but functional ...
. |
|
Latest blog entry: BAe Hawk 90mm EDF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Ken,
Glad you like it ... I am having fun too ... For motor I used a HET 650-68 with a kv of 1250 (see pictures above). I used my own fan calculator, but a simple rule for the CS-12bl fan is use the kv =1600 that works well on 6S and multiply by (6S/8S)=0.75 to get a kv in the 1200 region for an 8S setup. I have been a bit frustrated by the whole struts thing, trying to find a set that fits right and works reliably. The old FlyFly ones were 3mm pins, the new struts are longer (!) and now with 4mm pins, and so are the new metal trunion parts. The new struts don't work in the nose at all. |
|
Latest blog entry: BAe Hawk 90mm EDF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The nosegear retracts fine now, fully inside the fuse, although I had to cut out a big chunk of foam.
I also switched back to shorter struts and lighter wheels on the mains. The new wheels weigh a ton , and the struts are too long. And, you can't fit other wheels easily on them because of the way the axle is designed.. |
|
Latest blog entry: BAe Hawk 90mm EDF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My esc sits right on the CG. There's three reasons for that,
a) the battery cables (black, red) need to be kept short as usual in EDFs (the instructions are very clear about this, usually < 20cm) so as not to blow the capacitors, and then the mosfets on the esc from voltage spikes; b) the esc needs good cooling, so above the duct is a good location, that I used in several other edfs (eg tam f16); c) the esc I am using (120A HV) is one big chunk of metal and I don't want to have too much weight in the tail (CG problems), so moving it forward right above the expected CG seems like a good compromise. I also wrapped the motor and power cables in aluminum foil to eliminate any sort or rf interference with the servo cables, which run right next to the power cables. . |
|
Latest blog entry: BAe Hawk 90mm EDF
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
As mentioned earlier, the Hawk gets the new ChangeSun 12 blade fan I got some time ago from X-Flight HK.
The Hawk should be a good testbed for this inexpensive fan, and the fact that the fan is a brick should not be a problem - as the Hawk foam airframe is very light to start with. The fan blade assembly was not rigid enough to be safe, and the whole unit was badly out of balance. I re-assembled the fan with Hysol, and re-balanced the whole rotor unit using the same static balancing method I have been using for ten years or so : http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showt...1521751&pp=100 The result should (hopefully) be a well balanced fan, that won't vibrate like crazy and destroy the motor bearings in no time ![]() Short video on how I balanced the CS 12bl fan with reasonably high accuracy on a $3 magnetic balancer : .
.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
I agree, some thirty-plus-page most elaborate build and mod thread evolve to where it seems like the foamie is finally getting ready for the scale masters, then either the grossly overweight and over-engineered thing never flies. Or the maiden comes and the guy loses it to some rather trivial setup problem ![]() I personally think the FlyFly Hawk should be taken for what it is, a simple and very lightweight semi-scale weekend flier that is very suitable (like the real one) for some fine low speed semi-scale aerobatic routines. As such, I plan to build it LIGHT, RUGGED (see split elevators) and SIMPLE to maintain (simple retracts, no gear door nonsense etc.). At the same time, it needs to have good power, otherwise the Red Arrows Hawk will scoot around like a lame duck . Nevertheless the power need not be excessive - since the airframe is very light to start with.It would seem reasonable to me that that target power should be in the 1800-2400W range or so. My setup is such that I can go up and down in power and battery size by a cell or so (8S to 9S for ex.). This last one is the FLEXIBILITY argument. |
|
|
Latest blog entry: BAe Hawk 90mm EDF
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
To absorb that kind of power you will need an inrunner (forget about outrunners for this fan) motor in the 300g range. The motor can diam needs to be between 36mm and 39mm, the motor length should be in the 60-70mm range. I myself am using the HET 650-68 motor (see above), but other suitable motors are Turnigys of various types (XK3674, XK3665), other HET motors (like the 700 series), Neu 1415 and 1515 series, Tacon (HobbyPartz), Leopard, Tenshock, JePe type EDF motors etc. etc. PS. I think those T-45 struts are too small (short) for the Hawk, the FF Hawk is quite a bit bigger than the CMP Hawk. |
|
|
Latest blog entry: BAe Hawk 90mm EDF
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
I was looking at this motor, it might be suitable, or something similar to it:
http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...dProduct=17735 Mine does have open endbells though, better for cooling in EDF. |
|
Latest blog entry: BAe Hawk 90mm EDF
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion KV2 Gigant | tmanzaroli | RC Tanks | 2 | Apr 04, 2012 05:34 PM |
| Discussion one sheet dollar tree foam board flying wing | 63 nova | The Builders Workshop | 1 | Mar 12, 2012 04:18 AM |
| Discussion One man foam wing cutting wire position calculator | chiloschista | The Builders Workshop | 7 | Mar 08, 2012 03:35 PM |
| Discussion Leaving this area, and have a big chunk of foam .... not coming with me | saucerguy | Foamies (Scratchbuilt) | 0 | Jul 21, 2010 04:22 AM |
| Discussion Yet another flying chunk O' foam.... | power | Aerial Photography | 53 | Feb 12, 2009 01:30 PM |