|
|
|
|
|
|
|
good input guys.
now... wouldn't those protection circuits then be useful in avoiding over-charging disasters? in case of a cell imbalance, one of the cells in a series will flip the power off switch. the pack will not be fully charged, so during use, you will begin to see gradual, diminishing power loss, which in turn would make you check into the cell imbalance possibilities. if you build the pack like this, it sounds to me like you'd have an almost fool-proof protection against lipo fires coming from cell imbalance. no? so, if and when the pack balance is off, and you noticed this because of gradual decline in power delivery, then you undo the shrink wrap and maybe this circuit board would have a few small connection points where you could individually check and recharge the cells. somebody must have thought of this already... why would this not work? too costly? too bulky? cell fail percentage too low? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks to all who have contributed. I see how an imbalanced pack can have cells with voltage dropping 2.5 or going over 4.2 in normal charge or discharge.
All the suggestions about protection circuitry here is hard to implement as you'll need to have high current rating circuitry, which will make the solution bulky and expensive. Imagine having an ESC size circuit for each cell. I believe the Duralite packs use regulators for their cells. That is probably why they only have RX battery packs (low discharge rate.) A solution would be to have connections from each cell going to the ESC. ESC monitors each cell and when any imbalance is detected ESC cuts off the motor but not the servos. After all ESC already has high current control circuitry. (Is anyone from Castle Creations here?) A similar concept can work with chargers. But I think it would be more practical charge each cell separately. I have already started looking for some surplus mobile phone chargers and will be repacking my batteries so I can charge each cell separately. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
That doesn't stop the possibility of e.g. a shorted back going up in a crash, or motor failure. But it does protect the pack in its most dangerous phase - charging - because typically that is done when the pack is in the vicinity (homes, people,car etc etc). See threads on her circuit. It adds a little weight, so is probably not ideal for small packs as in parkflyers, but in terms of protecting a big investment in a big kilowatt output pack, and the nightmare scenario of a big fire from such a pack, its worth looking into. It also automatically self balances a pack, making it less likley to fail from one cell getting too low in voltage. There is a LOT of FUD (fear uncertainty and doubt - IBM speak) being spread around by various people, and some pack manufacturers and cell suppliers are using it as a lever to increase their sales. Beware of either succumbing to marketspik, paranoia or indeed complacency. Lipo is a bit dangerous, and needs care. But its not an atomic bomb armed and ready to destroy your neighborhood. 99% of people using em have had no problems beyond maybe a puffed up cell and a ruined pack, and if you don't run them too flat, or draw more current than about 5-6C for extended periods they are going to last, stay balanced, until they simply lose sufficient capacity to be thrown away. |
|
|
||
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why does no Federal $$ for stem cell research | Majortomski | Life, The Universe, and Politics | 13 | Nov 08, 2004 10:47 PM |
| Rant Why does running a lithium poly completely out destroy it? | zmonte | Batteries and Chargers | 3 | Oct 17, 2004 04:42 PM |
| Lipo fire........cell imbalance? | AussieParkflyer | Batteries and Chargers | 28 | Feb 01, 2004 08:00 PM |
| Lithium Polymer Cell Imbalance: A Mitigating Solution | Awakened | Batteries and Chargers | 25 | Jan 29, 2004 01:23 PM |
| Batteries: why does a 9.6V cell pack charge to 11V? | pfm | Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) | 7 | Sep 23, 2002 05:10 PM |