Mar 01, 2002, 08:24 PM
|
|
|
Cabin 21...
Joined Jan 2001
2,118 Posts
|
You can tie compensation to sales in a way that each sale does not directly award a commision. We used to do it this way; Say your margin is enough that you can afford to pay the employee 10%(Just easy numbers for demonstration) commission. Track the sales for your employee for a week. Let's say he/she sells $4000.00. Divide what he/she sells by the number of hours he/she worked in that week. You get average sales in $ per hour. multiply the sales p/hour figure by the 10% commission. If he/she sells $4000.00 and works 40 hours, the commission would be $10.00 bucks an hour, right?
Now here's the good part. (finally, I know) Start your employee at $8.00 per hour. If he/she averages more than $80.00 an hour in sales for say, one month, give her/him a 5% raise in hourly rate, to $8.40 p/hour. Keep doing this as long as the employee per hour sales keep growing. Eventually, your employee will max out their ability, and you will be paying them 10% (or whatever) and your margin will stay the same. If the employee's sales averages drop for one month, their per hour rate drops. accordingly. It really becomes good for them after one year, because you can compare the same month as the previous year. This way if business is seasonal, they won't starve in the down times, and your payroll won't double in the busy season.
The downside is that if your sales drop you may be paying more in hourly salary than you would if you paid straight commission, but as the business owner, the risk and the reward fall on you.
The upside is that if sales continue to grow, you as the owner will always be ahead of the margin curve. Also, this allows your sales staff to relax a bit with customers, because not every sale is a life or death struggle for a commission. Slow steady increase in client base provides the reward, not the immediate sale. It also really puts the employees salary in their own hands, and reduces animosity, because they all know that pay is purely dependant on performance and a willingness to work more hours.
At least this is how it worked for us.
|
|
|
Last edited by lrsudog; Mar 01, 2002 at 08:28 PM.
|
|