Flying-Hobby Lucky Draw @ FACEBOOK Blog Facebook @ FLYING-HOBBY
Reply
Thread Tools
Old Dec 11, 2012, 10:52 PM
learning to crash Heli's
Thunder Fighter's Avatar
Melbourne
Joined Aug 2007
564 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Marks View Post
Does this answer your question?
Yes thanks, I will keep to my 0.1v per cell difference as my own safe guideline.

//Dennis.
Thunder Fighter is offline Find More Posts by Thunder Fighter
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Dec 12, 2012, 12:42 PM
Southern Pride
everydayflyer's Avatar
Haralson County GA. USA
Joined Oct 2004
34,187 Posts
Quote:
Generally, the closer the better. In reality, probably within 0.5V per cell is probably going to be O.K. Again, some would argue that's too much.
Perhaps a typo but if not then yes IMO 0.5V per cell differenvce is way to much.

For all intent and purposes a fully charged LiPoly cell is 4.2V and one at 3.7V has no useable cpacity left. Some could iinterpret 0.5V per cell as 1.5V for a 3S.

This is why I posted above that


Quote:
No but they should be very close.
In responce to

Quote:
Do the batteries all have to be in the same state of charge with the PL6?...
and why I provided a link to a very good Parallel charging / balancing thread.

IMO there is no simple short accutrate answer. All of my LiPolys are at 3.7 to 3.8 bvolts per cell following a flight thus a 3S will be between 11.1 and 11.4 volts for a total of 0.3V per battery , 0.1V per cell difference. Connecting these in parallel presents no issues. The max. curret flow from a 11.4 V battery to a 11.1V one will be fine in most cases.

I would not however connect a 3S 11.4V 65C discharge LiPoly to a 3S 11.1V 10C one, most would but not I.

There are online Ohm's Law calcuators which will show how many amps. will flow with X amount of voltage difference however one then gets into the gray area of well are the cells all of tye same IR or will current flow be restricted somewaht due to the lower voltage cells having a higher resistence ,etc., etc..

As pointed out the MPA is not a cure all but having polyfuses restricting current flow and also indicating excess current flow helps.

FYI those 1A polyfuses will pass a lot more than 1A for a brief period of time.



Charles
everydayflyer is offline Find More Posts by everydayflyer
RCG Plus Member
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 07:10 AM
Registered User
Collierville, TN
Joined Aug 2003
321 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunder Fighter View Post
Yes thanks, I will keep to my 0.1v per cell difference as my own safe guideline.

//Dennis.
.
Dennis,

Through operational error (ahem), I have plugged a fully charged and a fully discharged (20%) 6S pack into the PL8 w/MPA before with no ill effects whatsoever.
.
The full pack just discharges into the empty pack until they are equal then the PL8 happily charges them up.
.
No hot wires, no smoke, no Four Horsemen . . . Mr. Ohm did a pretty good job when he passed that law . . .
.
klhoard is offline Find More Posts by klhoard
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 07:25 AM
Life begins at transition
Australia, WA, Perth
Joined May 2007
3,080 Posts
No death and destruction in the short term, but there is a fair chance you exceeded the max charge rate for the flat battery.
It didn't burn the house down, but almost certainly shortened the life of the lipo. Not ideal I guess...
Odysis is offline Find More Posts by Odysis
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 08:08 AM
Southern Pride
everydayflyer's Avatar
Haralson County GA. USA
Joined Oct 2004
34,187 Posts
Please note that at this linked post I used a 2.5A polyfuse to test current flow from higher to lower

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showp...54&postcount=1


The 2.5A polyfuse was not as limiting as the 1A ones on the MPA are but then on the other hand it was more limiting than just the power leads would have been.




Charles
everydayflyer is offline Find More Posts by everydayflyer
RCG Plus Member
Last edited by everydayflyer; Dec 13, 2012 at 11:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 01:37 PM
President, FMA, Inc.
Tim Marks's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
1,048 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by everydayflyer View Post
Perhaps a typo but if not then yes IMO 0.5V per cell differenvce is way to much.

For all intent and purposes a fully charged LiPoly cell is 4.2V and one at 3.7V has no useable cpacity left. Some could iinterpret 0.5V per cell as 1.5V for a 3S.

This is why I posted above that




In responce to



and why I provided a link to a very good Parallel charging / balancing thread.

IMO there is no simple short accutrate answer. All of my LiPolys are at 3.7 to 3.8 bvolts per cell following a flight thus a 3S will be between 11.1 and 11.4 volts for a total of 0.3V per battery , 0.1V per cell difference. Connecting these in parallel presents no issues. The max. curret flow from a 11.4 V battery to a 11.1V one will be fine in most cases.

I would not however connect a 3S 11.4V 65C discharge LiPoly to a 3S 11.1V 10C one, most would but not I.

There are online Ohm's Law calcuators which will show how many amps. will flow with X amount of voltage difference however one then gets into the gray area of well are the cells all of tye same IR or will current flow be restricted somewaht due to the lower voltage cells having a higher resistence ,etc., etc..

As pointed out the MPA is not a cure all but having polyfuses restricting current flow and also indicating excess current flow helps.

FYI those 1A polyfuses will pass a lot more than 1A for a brief period of time.



Charles
Hi Charles:

Regarding acceptable voltage spread on cell voltage when parallel charging, I won't argue the point with you. From a manufacturer's perspective, our biggest concern is safety and the prevention of fires; admittedly I'm not as worried about pack longevity, and it may be that 0.5V spread could cause long-term damage and reduced pack life. We don't have the time or the resources to devote to careful testing of this. We have only tested for safety and we can say with great confidence that it does not generally represent a safety issue to connect even completely discharged packs with fully charged packs. I'm sure you would be more well versed in what the optimum voltage spread should be. Customers are always asking "what's the magic number"? I'm probably not the best person to ask in this regard for the reasons I outlined above. Also, with many customers, it sometimes doesn't matter what we recommend. They often tend to want to push the envelope and charge faster, more batteries, whatever.

Tim Marks
Tim Marks is offline Find More Posts by Tim Marks
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 01:45 PM
JUNK RADIO
Flazo's Avatar
USA, NY, Queens
Joined Dec 2006
2,955 Posts
I only care about SAFETY.

fred
Flazo is offline Find More Posts by Flazo
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 06:55 PM
ancora imparo
jj604's Avatar
Melbourne, Australia
Joined Jul 2005
4,029 Posts
Pack or cell sum voltage?

UPDATE:

OK ignore this. I checked and the software allows you to chose.

thanks

John

=======

Tim, was wondering if you could tell me the answer to this.

In the data export function the manual states, "BT2 format used by the West Mountain Radio CBA graphing software. This format exports only voltage versus charge."

Question is: Is this the pack voltage from the main leads or the cell sum voltage from the balance leads?

In other words is the pack voltage that is exported to the CBA software a four wire (true pack voltage) or two wire (including lead drops) number?

Thanks

John
jj604 is offline Find More Posts by jj604
Last edited by jj604; Dec 14, 2012 at 03:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2012, 04:25 AM
Registered User
Joined Apr 2011
14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Marks View Post
Hi:

Just so you don't think we were ignoring you, I had noticed your post in RCG. I've been struggling with the right way to approach it and offer you support. .........

I don't know if the PL you have would have still been under warranty. You did not say. ...........

.....If it comes back to the U.S., FMA has a standard, fixed-cost repair fee and we guarantee it will be repaired correctly. Also, if you affect the repair yourself, you do not have the luxury of running the unit through factory automated testing and re-calibration. ...........

...... If you choose to continue along your current path to self-repair, we would be happy to send you a replacement FET and we generally do this at no charge. I would also like to give you a piece of good news. ..........If this damaged FET is the problem, it's at least a good possibility you caught it before it had a chance to escalate and cause damage to more components. I'll give you a gold star for troubleshooting that!

Anyway, I hope I've helped you with this post.

Tim Marks
Hi Tim,
Thanx for your prompt reply.

My PL8 is more than one & a half year old, obviously out of warranty. Shipping cost and customs (from & back to Islamabad) is outrageously expensive, so much so that i could buy a new PL8. For these reason i elected to try and repair it myself.

If i or one of my friend is visiting U.S., i would defiantly send in my PL8 for factory re-calibration.

Tim its been over a month now, that i take my batteries over to my friends (PL8 owners) every Friday evening for the week end flights (winter in Islamabad Is not too bad). I would really appreciate if you could ship me 2 or 3 of those FETs, cause SNG route seems like a long wait....

Rgds
riz1963 is offline Find More Posts by riz1963
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2012, 04:37 AM
Registered User
Joined Apr 2011
14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by REVOJohn View Post

hey there riz
i think we have been corresponding and we're bringing fets in from the factory and passing to your friend in singpore as per your request
Hi John,
Thanx for your reply, but my friend is already back home in Pakistan.
Pls quote the shipping cost, i can pay via visa card.

rgds
riz1963 is offline Find More Posts by riz1963
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2012, 04:29 AM
Registered User
Joined Apr 2011
14 Posts
@Tim any updates.......

Rgds
riz1963 is offline Find More Posts by riz1963
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2012, 05:03 PM
President, FMA, Inc.
Tim Marks's Avatar
Joined Mar 2008
1,048 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by riz1963 View Post
@Tim any updates.......

Rgds
Hi:

Sorry, I thought I was out of the loop on this one. I was under the impression that you were communicating with REVO Singapore now. But I received an email on Dec 14 from John Grzan over there. He said he emailed you, but you did not reply. Must be email problems; possibly your spam box grabbing his email? Might want to check that.

Otherwise, tell me what else I can do in a PM. Where are you located?

Tim Marks
Tim Marks is offline Find More Posts by Tim Marks
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 06:37 AM
Registered User
REVOJohn's Avatar
Singapore, Singapore
Joined Apr 2012
216 Posts
rizwan

relax. i am already emailintg you.
your fets are ready. email me where to ship it to exaclty and you can do the change out yourself. email me directly and not via forums. its much easier their as i don;t track forums everyday
REVOJohn is offline Find More Posts by REVOJohn
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 03:47 PM
The earth sucks! Thankfully.
Joined Jun 2003
388 Posts
PL8 Maximum Input Voltage

Hi:

What is the max input voltage for the PL8?

- Jim
JimHSoars is offline Find More Posts by JimHSoars
Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 04:21 PM
Registered User
So. Cal.
Joined Oct 2004
6,176 Posts
From first post of this thread:

"Input voltage: 10-32VDC, reverse polarity protected"
mrforsyth is online now Find More Posts by mrforsyth
RCG Plus Member
Reply With Quote
Reply

Castle Creations      DRIVE / FLY / SUPPORT  

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Sneak Peek! 2, 1:8 scale scratchbuilts ooby Scale Boats 31 Jul 24, 2011 08:30 AM
Discussion Proposed schemes for 2010 season RAF BAe Hawk display-sneak peek! Matt Halton Electric Ducted Fan Jet Talk 3 Dec 20, 2009 03:11 AM
Discussion Sneak Peek at the New Creation Museum Miami Mike Life, The Universe, and Politics 38 May 30, 2007 05:01 PM
Hey Mr. Lin, how about a sneak peek at the Hellcat? splatman GWS (Grand Wing Servo) 1 Jul 05, 2003 04:43 AM