New Products Flash Sale
View Poll Results: Do you think Global Warming is caused by Mankinds burning of fossil fuels?
Yes, it is caused by fossil fuels 236 34.65%
Not sure 79 11.60%
No it is not cause by fossil fuels 366 53.74%
Voters: 681. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Old Jul 26, 2015, 08:41 AM
Electromagnetic is online now
Find More Posts by Electromagnetic
Ultra Violet
Electromagnetic's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
4,861 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redhotpearl View Post
I don't think burning Fossil Fuels is helping at all if you believe the vast majority of scientists. That being said good luck with this topic, not to many science majors or even fans around here it seems.
This is the second reply in this thread 4 years ago. What a clever fellow.
Electromagnetic is online now Find More Posts by Electromagnetic
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2015, 11:37 AM
MtnGoat is offline
Find More Posts by MtnGoat
Tu ne cede malis
MtnGoat's Avatar
United States, WA, Lyle
Joined Dec 2000
1,487 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by emufingers View Post
Just read the scientific literature and the calculations of costs and refute is scientifically and rationally if you can.

I don't see any rational rebuttal of the case put forward by the UN.

The case has been made and the method described, that is why it is up to any wh post here to refute it.
Of course you don't see any rational rebuttal. You won't accept any rebuttals you don't already agree with.

Just as they fail to *actually* practice proper method by relentlessly searching for falsifications, instead of relentlessly searching for evidence consistent with their claims, you refuse to accept clear and glaring problems with their methodology. And noting these, is, rational rebuttal.

Noting that the failure to predict the plateau in advance, is a rational rebuttal because it falsifies their predictions.

Noting their failure to correctly predict the number of hurricanes in advance is also a rational rebuttal, because it's a second case of falsification.

It doesn't matter how many say these things don't matter. They do in every other science, and they matter here if what is argued claims to be science too.
MtnGoat is offline Find More Posts by MtnGoat
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2015, 11:51 AM
MtnGoat is offline
Find More Posts by MtnGoat
Tu ne cede malis
MtnGoat's Avatar
United States, WA, Lyle
Joined Dec 2000
1,487 Posts
The Truth about CO2 (4 min 32 sec)
MtnGoat is offline Find More Posts by MtnGoat
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2015, 11:57 AM
Electromagnetic is online now
Find More Posts by Electromagnetic
Ultra Violet
Electromagnetic's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
4,861 Posts
Hurray, Right Here!

http://blog.nwf.org/2015/07/u-s-offs...utm_medium=nwf
Electromagnetic is online now Find More Posts by Electromagnetic
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2015, 12:00 PM
madsci_guy is online now
Find More Posts by madsci_guy
Figure Nine Champ
madsci_guy's Avatar
North Texas
Joined Nov 2002
1,329 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Electromagnetic View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by article
The State of Rhode Island and Deepwater Wind engaged in years of inclusive discussion, strategic ocean planning, surveying, and siting, all guided by sound science and the feedback from those who know Rhode Island’s waters best.
Now that is a political wordsmith job, if I've ever seen one.


Wonder how many pellet stoves that will replace?

And let's not forget the last project that had "Deepwater" in the name.

madsci_guy is online now Find More Posts by madsci_guy
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2015, 12:10 PM
Electromagnetic is online now
Find More Posts by Electromagnetic
Ultra Violet
Electromagnetic's Avatar
Joined Feb 2013
4,861 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by madsci_guy View Post
Now that is a political wordsmith job, if I've ever seen one.


Wonder how many pellet stoves that will replace?

And let's not forget the last project that had "Deepwater" in the name.
This is not oil you see, It is wind, but nice try at putting your negative spin on anything at all. Just so you can comprehend the difference, here is some reading for you:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwa...izon_oil_spill

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_Island_Wind_Farm
Electromagnetic is online now Find More Posts by Electromagnetic
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2015, 07:33 PM
Big Foot 48 is online now
Find More Posts by Big Foot 48
Alarm Bells Continuing!
Big Foot 48's Avatar
Arizona
Joined Oct 2001
277 Posts
Whew, this is a big relief. I will be dead and de-evolving in 35 years. One less thing to worry about!
Quote:
Prince Charles is warning that there are only 35 years left to save the planet from climate disaster, which represents a 33-year extension of his previous deadline.

In March 2009, the heir to the British throne predicted that the world had 100 months “before we risk catastrophic climate change,” as pointed out by Climate Depot’s Marc Morano.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...sday-deadline/
Big Foot 48 is online now Find More Posts by Big Foot 48
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2015, 08:05 PM
mikefast is offline
Find More Posts by mikefast
Registered User
mikefast's Avatar
Houston Intercont, Texas, United States
Joined Jun 2001
122 Posts
I'll put this here before Pete uses it as proof of AGW. Today it hit 100 degrees, the first time that happened since 2013. Over 600 days of below 100 degrees. Now that just HAS to prove global warming. That is if we don't count 2011 when we had over 50 days of above 100 degrees.
mikefast is offline Find More Posts by mikefast
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2015, 08:20 PM
Big Foot 48 is online now
Find More Posts by Big Foot 48
Alarm Bells Continuing!
Big Foot 48's Avatar
Arizona
Joined Oct 2001
277 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikefast View Post
I'll put this here before Pete uses it as proof of AGW. Today it hit 100 degrees, the first time that happened since 2013. Over 600 days of below 100 degrees. Now that just HAS to prove global warming. That is if we don't count 2011 when we had over 50 days of above 100 degrees.
Doesn't count. Global warming impacts are measured in tenths of a degree. Your numbers are way, way too big!
Big Foot 48 is online now Find More Posts by Big Foot 48
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 29, 2015, 10:15 PM
JumpySticks is offline
Find More Posts by JumpySticks
Drifting off the reservation..
JumpySticks's Avatar
USA, LA, Broussard
Joined Jan 2011
2,296 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by emufingers View Post
Who exactly is "we all"? Do you purport to represent a group or is this just the "royal we". It is noticeable that those who have the most doubts about their position, resort to referring to a mythical plural.
Like that mysterious, nameless "consensus" you rely upon for moral support?
JumpySticks is offline Find More Posts by JumpySticks
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2015, 10:48 AM
Deadstick 8409 is offline
Find More Posts by Deadstick 8409
Registered User
Deadstick 8409's Avatar
Joined May 2010
1,224 Posts
Jeff Severinghaus, Scripps Institution of Oceanography

Is runaway global warming already happening? (5 min 50 sec)
Deadstick 8409 is offline Find More Posts by Deadstick 8409
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2015, 11:02 AM
robogizzard is online now
Find More Posts by robogizzard
Registered User
Joined May 2014
21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deadstick 8409 View Post
Is it really like a time bomb with a 100 year fuse? uh huh, right.

And since they make no mention of the historical trend and natural range of variability, as well as the frightful language they use, we can safely assume that this is yet another unscientific attempt at using fear to convince people of something that has no tangible evidence of actually existing.

yay! more bs!
robogizzard is online now Find More Posts by robogizzard
Reply With Quote
Old Aug 01, 2015, 11:26 AM
RCWorks is offline
Find More Posts by RCWorks
Registered User
Joined Aug 2003
1,957 Posts
The 97% Consensus? Global Warming Unmasked! (33 min 19 sec)
RCWorks is offline Find More Posts by RCWorks
RCG Plus Member
Old Aug 01, 2015, 07:20 PM
mikefast is offline
Find More Posts by mikefast
Registered User
mikefast's Avatar
Houston Intercont, Texas, United States
Joined Jun 2001
122 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCWorks View Post
I enjoyed that post. It sounds logical to me, and makes sense. Thanks for posting that. Like he said, so far the global warming that there has been, has been positive, and will be positive for quite some time. How about some of you alarmists tell us why the man is wrong. If you can, that is.
mikefast is offline Find More Posts by mikefast
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Human Caused Global Warming is Offically A Religion- Earth 2100 Lightnin Life, The Universe, and Politics 29 Aug 21, 2014 11:57 PM
Discussion What do you think caused the ice ages? Bilbobaker Life, The Universe, and Politics 71 Jun 24, 2014 03:21 AM
Discussion who do you think you are? Aaron 1 Life, The Universe, and Politics 30 Feb 25, 2013 07:39 PM
Discussion Sad to be posting here. What do you think caused this? ndb8fxe Crash Discussion 8 Feb 28, 2009 09:57 PM
Discussion A complete list of things caused by global warming Viper Pilot Life, The Universe, and Politics 2 Apr 24, 2008 06:42 PM